Author Topic: Based on the IFBB judging criteria?  (Read 9071 times)

SF1900

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 49708
  • Team Hairy Chest Henda
Re: Based on the IFBB judging criteria?
« Reply #50 on: September 24, 2015, 12:56:25 PM »
Yes he's been getting gift placings but sometimes when he just walks out for his posing routine he looks damn crazy. Like when he took 2nd in the O. Very very thick. Be There says he's been called ripped undeservedly and I agree except for the legs. Very hard legs.

Like here:



Too bad a bodybuilding contest is more than just legs.

Uncrowned 6x leg Mr. Olympia.
X

Hulkotron

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 29937
  • Expunged
Re: Based on the IFBB judging criteria?
« Reply #51 on: September 24, 2015, 02:44:46 PM »
Tidily dressed hair, well-shaped feet.

stuntmovie

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 8946
  • Getbig!
Re: Based on the IFBB judging criteria?
« Reply #52 on: September 24, 2015, 03:24:48 PM »
HOWARD, I agree with you 100% when you said, "I do know the judging process is NOT some detailed elaborate conspiracy plan designed to evoke controversy."

But I'm probably only one of the 10% on this Board who would agree with that statement.

Friends, family, and fans have been disagreeing with bodybuilding decisions since the days of the AAU, way before the NPC and the IFBB were the head cheeses in the cheese-cake  factory.

It may seem strange to say this but ..... that bit of judging  controversy may be one of the major factors that keeps it alive and a major topic of conversation among the fans and a small part of the general population

Years ago we use to invite judging result antagonists to sit in as test judges in an effort to see if their judging tabulations were consistent with the official judging results.

No statistics here but during the majority of occasions  ... the test judge scores were somewhat similar to the official results so the "It was political" accusations came to an abrupt halt among that group of test judge bodybuilding fans until a new group of fans made similar accusations and were eventually invited to 'sit in' and be a test judge.

I would bet you that all the GetBiggers who have been complaining about the official placings weren't even physically present  .... and if they were present ..... they were most likely seated no where near the official judges' table.









wael_iron

  • Getbig II
  • **
  • Posts: 57
Re: Based on the IFBB judging criteria?
« Reply #53 on: September 24, 2015, 03:34:55 PM »
If the judges took that criteria strictly, William Bonac would have been top 3. He pretty much has it all--good size, conditioning, flow, symmetry, aesthetics.

I agree, even he was more complete than Heath.

mr.turbo

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 4617
  • Team Freedom
Re: Based on the IFBB judging criteria?
« Reply #54 on: September 24, 2015, 03:42:57 PM »
Even Peter McGough couldn't bring himself to accept branch's placing "the torso just isn't there"...it's not much fun for the rest of us to be spoon fed this horseshit about branch being "gnarly" and "aggressive"

I don't believe professional bodybuilding is regulated at all although there is some suggestion of it being a competitive event

I find myself mystified when it comes to defining this activity, There's some type of "committee" but it's seems to operate like pro wrestling where it's simply a set of "storylines" and "shows"...hmmm is it a secret? Is it a mafia? What's going on?

For example; amateur wresting and pro wresting are rather different. Is that the same for bodybuilding?

Let's hope someone can clarify this matter and I don't have to stare out into space pondering this indefinitely.  8)
"