Author Topic: Genetic percentile?  (Read 2796 times)

OTHstrong

  • Competitors II
  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 14122
  • Jasher
Re: Genetic percentile?
« Reply #25 on: March 03, 2016, 12:19:50 PM »
Levrone had a way better structure than Yates.
Not a chance in hell  ;)

Levrone had better shape to his traps and shoulders and better shape to delt..tricep,... bicep tie ins as a whole, which made him genetically elite but not bones structure. Levrone is narrow actually, narrow clavicles. Dorian had the perfect structure for width, depth, torso length, leg length and depth of rib cage. Yates' bone structure is a perfect 10

njflex

  • Competitors
  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 31563
  • HEY PAISAN
Re: Genetic percentile?
« Reply #26 on: March 03, 2016, 12:31:31 PM »
Not a chance in hell  ;)

Levrone had better shape to his traps and shoulders and better shape to delt..tricep,... bicep tie ins as a whole, which made him genetically elite but not bones structure. Levrone is narrow actually, narrow clavicles. Dorian had the perfect structure for width, depth, torso length, leg length and depth of rib cage. Yates' bone structure is a perfect 10
yates structure and thickness ,especially from the side is what made him standout.He had narrow hips with longish legs that made his taper look dramatic when he hit front and rear lat spread and the huge calves looked great with his upper legs.

OTHstrong

  • Competitors II
  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 14122
  • Jasher
Re: Genetic percentile?
« Reply #27 on: March 03, 2016, 01:24:25 PM »
yates structure and thickness ,especially from the side is what made him standout.He had narrow hips with longish legs that made his taper look dramatic when he hit front and rear lat spread and the huge calves looked great with his upper legs.
Yes, the depth from the side, insane