when nasser was at his best his back wasnt narrow or thin...it wasnt as hard as yates or as detailed as some guys..but it certainly wasnt thin or narrow. his back was very wide.
just to make sure that I understand correctly, Team Nasser is agreeing with Flex Mag about Nasser, except for the negative parts?
![Roll Eyes ::)](http://www.getbig.com/boards/Smileys/classic/rolleyes.gif)
so when they give praise on the good parts of Nasser we should believe them, but when they point out his negatives we should not believe them?
![Roll Eyes ::)](http://www.getbig.com/boards/Smileys/classic/rolleyes.gif)
so for example..Nasser is a fierce warrior and fights to the end, especially when he beats his wife?