Author Topic: Columnist: “I Went Gay So I Didn’t Have To Deal With Nutty Broads"  (Read 2586 times)

Army of One

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 30388
Has to be a getbigger, cant argue with his logic, no homo.

“Most of the reason I went gay is so I didn’t have to deal with nutty broads. Imagine how much worse they’re going to get when the passive aggressive manipulation tactics stop working because the guy can get himself off with a thinner, hotter robot any time he wants to. They’re going to go mental. In the West, women are surging ahead into positions of dominance in the media, the arts, academia, politics, you name it. Some people will find this offensive, but: matriarchy is a problem for the rest of us. As feminist critic Camilla Paglia so memorably put it, if civilisation had been left in female hands, we would still be living in grass huts. When men start checking out en masse, as is already happening, you can say good-bye to all of society’s best astrophysicists, mathematicians, philosophers, composers and chess players. Scientific progress will effectively stall, because men are just as happy beating a video game as they are solving the riddles of the universe — and they’ll take the entertainment option if they have no interest in impressing women. Women will not take men’s places in these disciplines, because there simply aren’t enough women with IQs over 120. Again, sorry if you find that offensive, but it’s just a fact. IQ isn’t a perfect measure, by any means, but it’s the best gauge we have of whether someone can perform the higher-level functions needed to be a game-changing scientist or transcendently brilliant artist.”

http://www.breitbart.com/big-government/2015/09/16/sexbots-why-women-should-panic/

polychronopolous

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 19041
Re: Columnist: “I Went Gay So I Didn’t Have To Deal With Nutty Broads"
« Reply #1 on: February 05, 2017, 01:30:17 PM »
He went gay for a little while.

wes

  • Competitors
  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 71212
  • What Dire Mishap Has Befallen Thee
Re: Columnist: “I Went Gay So I Didn’t Have To Deal With Nutty Broads"
« Reply #2 on: February 05, 2017, 01:42:34 PM »
Gay thread reported !

YngiweRhoads

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 4266
  • Shreddin'
Re: Columnist: “I Went Gay So I Didn’t Have To Deal With Nutty Broads"
« Reply #3 on: February 05, 2017, 01:44:27 PM »
The guy is spot on, aside from the gay shit.
6

Army of One

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 30388
Re: Columnist: “I Went Gay So I Didn’t Have To Deal With Nutty Broads"
« Reply #4 on: February 05, 2017, 01:44:56 PM »
Gay thread reported !

This is Getbig, heterosexual threads get reported here!

wes

  • Competitors
  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 71212
  • What Dire Mishap Has Befallen Thee
Re: Columnist: “I Went Gay So I Didn’t Have To Deal With Nutty Broads"
« Reply #5 on: February 05, 2017, 01:52:07 PM »
This is Getbig, heterosexual threads get reported here!
True....I forgot where I was posting!!  LOL  :D

mass243

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 12873
  • On right side of the history!
Re: Columnist: “I Went Gay So I Didn’t Have To Deal With Nutty Broads"
« Reply #6 on: February 05, 2017, 01:56:14 PM »

Must agree.
Women are not interested in making the world better place, to make humans achieve ever greater things, to develop...
Women are not that interested in putting random people on other side of the world down either, must hand them this.
World will be more stable and peaceful but stagnant place in female hands.

gothorium

  • Guest
Re: Columnist: “I Went Gay So I Didn’t Have To Deal With Nutty Broads"
« Reply #7 on: February 05, 2017, 01:59:41 PM »
Has to be a getbigger, cant argue with his logic, no homo.

“Most of the reason I went gay is so I didn’t have to deal with nutty broads. Imagine how much worse they’re going to get when the passive aggressive manipulation tactics stop working because the guy can get himself off with a thinner, hotter robot any time he wants to. They’re going to go mental. In the West, women are surging ahead into positions of dominance in the media, the arts, academia, politics, you name it. Some people will find this offensive, but: matriarchy is a problem for the rest of us. As feminist critic Camilla Paglia so memorably put it, if civilisation had been left in female hands, we would still be living in grass huts. When men start checking out en masse, as is already happening, you can say good-bye to all of society’s best astrophysicists, mathematicians, philosophers, composers and chess players. Scientific progress will effectively stall, because men are just as happy beating a video game as they are solving the riddles of the universe — and they’ll take the entertainment option if they have no interest in impressing women. Women will not take men’s places in these disciplines, because there simply aren’t enough women with IQs over 120. Again, sorry if you find that offensive, but it’s just a fact. IQ isn’t a perfect measure, by any means, but it’s the best gauge we have of whether someone can perform the higher-level functions needed to be a game-changing scientist or transcendently brilliant artist.”

http://www.breitbart.com/big-government/2015/09/16/sexbots-why-women-should-panic/


lower government spending and controls is the answer, unregulated capitalism
women will then be starving to death and money stops being stolen from productive engineers and engineers not lawyers or doctors get all the money by creating machines and value through machines, thorium clean atomic, private roads and cops, logic sfotware not judges, and end to ad money crony monopolies and end to abnk regs so no more bank crony and no more fractional resrve banking :) citizen to cotozen loans, end to liability based insurnace, end of public school, and manufacturing automatiion galroe with mass produced apartment buildings, and no more men n jail for fighting back against women, and no more baby men dotn want, zero baby money free trade not governmetn managed and no tariffs

nzmusclemonster

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 13693
  • Serenity Now!
Re: Columnist: “I Went Gay So I Didn’t Have To Deal With Nutty Broads"
« Reply #8 on: February 05, 2017, 02:30:34 PM »
He only went gay if you want him to.
P

Tapeworm

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 29349
  • Hold Fast
Re: Columnist: “I Went Gay So I Didn’t Have To Deal With Nutty Broads"
« Reply #9 on: February 05, 2017, 02:33:55 PM »
If you are burdened with a nutty broad it's because you put up with having a nutty broad around.  

"I'm not here for misery so I won't be tolerating any."  If you're exceptionally wonderful, like me, you can add, "I'm sure you feel likewise."  Now everyone's on the same page.

baldburgah

  • Getbig II
  • **
  • Posts: 20
  • Pagents and Schmoes
Re: Columnist: “I Went Gay So I Didn’t Have To Deal With Nutty Broads"
« Reply #10 on: February 05, 2017, 02:50:30 PM »
Has to be a getbigger, cant argue with his logic, no homo.

“Most of the reason I went gay is so I didn’t have to deal with nutty broads. Imagine how much worse they’re going to get when the passive aggressive manipulation tactics stop working because the guy can get himself off with a thinner, hotter robot any time he wants to. They’re going to go mental. In the West, women are surging ahead into positions of dominance in the media, the arts, academia, politics, you name it. Some people will find this offensive, but: matriarchy is a problem for the rest of us. As feminist critic Camilla Paglia so memorably put it, if civilisation had been left in female hands, we would still be living in grass huts. When men start checking out en masse, as is already happening, you can say good-bye to all of society’s best astrophysicists, mathematicians, philosophers, composers and chess players. Scientific progress will effectively stall, because men are just as happy beating a video game as they are solving the riddles of the universe — and they’ll take the entertainment option if they have no interest in impressing women. Women will not take men’s places in these disciplines, because there simply aren’t enough women with IQs over 120. Again, sorry if you find that offensive, but it’s just a fact. IQ isn’t a perfect measure, by any means, but it’s the best gauge we have of whether someone can perform the higher-level functions needed to be a game-changing scientist or transcendently brilliant artist.”

http://www.breitbart.com/big-government/2015/09/16/sexbots-why-women-should-panic/

I agrees with these concepts here EXCEPT justifying being 3$--I guess it's a slippery slope (pardon the pun.) Moreover, ironically , going to such an extreme is a very emotional reaction-

Freud says......

Desperate grab to justify his orientation. He was always a self defeated shit pipe wizard, as opposed to turning gay. In fact, he with his current attitude, he gives most broads a run for their money on the crazy factor....

Kwon

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 51892
  • PRONOUNS: Ze/Zir
Re: Columnist: “I Went Gay So I Didn’t Have To Deal With Nutty Broads"
« Reply #11 on: February 05, 2017, 05:37:36 PM »
Has to be a getbigger, cant argue with his logic, no homo.

“Most of the reason I went gay is so I didn’t have to deal with nutty broads. Imagine how much worse they’re going to get when the passive aggressive manipulation tactics stop working because the guy can get himself off with a thinner, hotter robot any time he wants to. They’re going to go mental. In the West, women are surging ahead into positions of dominance in the media, the arts, academia, politics, you name it. Some people will find this offensive, but: matriarchy is a problem for the rest of us. As feminist critic Camilla Paglia so memorably put it, if civilisation had been left in female hands, we would still be living in grass huts. When men start checking out en masse, as is already happening, you can say good-bye to all of society’s best astrophysicists, mathematicians, philosophers, composers and chess players. Scientific progress will effectively stall, because men are just as happy beating a video game as they are solving the riddles of the universe — and they’ll take the entertainment option if they have no interest in impressing women. Women will not take men’s places in these disciplines, because there simply aren’t enough women with IQs over 120. Again, sorry if you find that offensive, but it’s just a fact. IQ isn’t a perfect measure, by any means, but it’s the best gauge we have of whether someone can perform the higher-level functions needed to be a game-changing scientist or transcendently brilliant artist.”

http://www.breitbart.com/big-government/2015/09/16/sexbots-why-women-should-panic/

Now poof to?
Q

Coach is Back!

  • Competitors
  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 61505
  • It’s All Bullshit
Re: Columnist: “I Went Gay So I Didn’t Have To Deal With Nutty Broads"
« Reply #12 on: February 05, 2017, 05:42:16 PM »
Has to be a getbigger, cant argue with his logic, no homo.

“Most of the reason I went gay is so I didn’t have to deal with nutty broads. Imagine how much worse they’re going to get when the passive aggressive manipulation tactics stop working because the guy can get himself off with a thinner, hotter robot any time he wants to. They’re going to go mental. In the West, women are surging ahead into positions of dominance in the media, the arts, academia, politics, you name it. Some people will find this offensive, but: matriarchy is a problem for the rest of us. As feminist critic Camilla Paglia so memorably put it, if civilisation had been left in female hands, we would still be living in grass huts. When men start checking out en masse, as is already happening, you can say good-bye to all of society’s best astrophysicists, mathematicians, philosophers, composers and chess players. Scientific progress will effectively stall, because men are just as happy beating a video game as they are solving the riddles of the universe — and they’ll take the entertainment option if they have no interest in impressing women. Women will not take men’s places in these disciplines, because there simply aren’t enough women with IQs over 120. Again, sorry if you find that offensive, but it’s just a fact. IQ isn’t a perfect measure, by any means, but it’s the best gauge we have of whether someone can perform the higher-level functions needed to be a game-changing scientist or transcendently brilliant artist.”

http://www.breitbart.com/big-government/2015/09/16/sexbots-why-women-should-panic/

Great testimonial, Howard

tres_taco_combo

  • Competitors
  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 5246
Re: Columnist: “I Went Gay So I Didn’t Have To Deal With Nutty Broads"
« Reply #13 on: February 05, 2017, 06:07:47 PM »
If you are burdened with a nutty broad it's because you put up with having a nutty broad around.  

"I'm not here for misery so I won't be tolerating any."  If you're exceptionally wonderful, like me, you can add, "I'm sure you feel likewise."  Now everyone's on the same page.


well said. I never have female drama

Fortress

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 20748
Re: Columnist: “I Went Gay So I Didn’t Have To Deal With Nutty Broads"
« Reply #14 on: February 05, 2017, 07:02:47 PM »
Women, with all their "freedoms", are ruining the west. Progressive feminists blast the patriarchy, but without the white patriarchy, they would be forced to live like orthodox Moozie broads. Females today are overwhelmingly undesirable, in a serious-relationship way.

Strangely, many feel their inherent femininity is an unfavourable attribute, and they actively work to downplay it, not realizing it's entirely beautiful and very powerful. They bought into the feminism charade, engineered by Jew globalists/elites who merely wanted a means to tax the other 50 percent.

They've been sold a lie. Modern women are more unhappy than ever before and it's exactly because of feminism. It has eroded their natural tendencies and separated them from that which naturally brings them joy.

Women today are lost. Men today are confused.

What a predicament.

chokeslam

  • Getbig II
  • **
  • Posts: 213
Re: Columnist: “I Went Gay So I Didn’t Have To Deal With Nutty Broads"
« Reply #15 on: February 06, 2017, 12:11:33 AM »
I love vagina, but I would give my left nut if I could wake up homosexual.

Everyone laughes but I think the gays got it good nowadays.

Kwon

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 51892
  • PRONOUNS: Ze/Zir
Re: Columnist: “I Went Gay So I Didn’t Have To Deal With Nutty Broads"
« Reply #16 on: February 06, 2017, 01:12:43 AM »
Q

Mitch

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 4049
  • Team Succulent Ham of Peace
Re: Columnist: “I Went Gay So I Didn’t Have To Deal With Nutty Broads"
« Reply #17 on: February 06, 2017, 01:19:12 AM »
Has to be a getbigger, cant argue with his logic, no homo.

“Most of the reason I went gay is so I didn’t have to deal with nutty broads. Imagine how much worse they’re going to get when the passive aggressive manipulation tactics stop working because the guy can get himself off with a thinner, hotter robot any time he wants to. They’re going to go mental. In the West, women are surging ahead into positions of dominance in the media, the arts, academia, politics, you name it. Some people will find this offensive, but: matriarchy is a problem for the rest of us. As feminist critic Camilla Paglia so memorably put it, if civilisation had been left in female hands, we would still be living in grass huts. When men start checking out en masse, as is already happening, you can say good-bye to all of society’s best astrophysicists, mathematicians, philosophers, composers and chess players. Scientific progress will effectively stall, because men are just as happy beating a video game as they are solving the riddles of the universe — and they’ll take the entertainment option if they have no interest in impressing women. Women will not take men’s places in these disciplines, because there simply aren’t enough women with IQs over 120. Again, sorry if you find that offensive, but it’s just a fact. IQ isn’t a perfect measure, by any means, but it’s the best gauge we have of whether someone can perform the higher-level functions needed to be a game-changing scientist or transcendently brilliant artist.”

http://www.breitbart.com/big-government/2015/09/16/sexbots-why-women-should-panic/
sounds like some pathetic beta talk from someone who got dumped by his gf. Nutty broads? and what about faggoty crybabies  ::)

dogbowl

  • Getbig IV
  • ****
  • Posts: 1012
  • Team anyone except heath
Re: Columnist: “I Went Gay So I Didn’t Have To Deal With Nutty Broads"
« Reply #18 on: February 06, 2017, 01:32:42 AM »
FYI, this is the same Milo who sparked the Berkley riots a few days ago because people thought he was a nazi.


Ronnie Rep

  • Competitors
  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 10117
  • Getbig!
Re: Columnist: “I Went Gay So I Didn’t Have To Deal With Nutty Broads"
« Reply #19 on: February 06, 2017, 10:00:22 AM »
That's Gay.