Author Topic: Taking On A Bouncer? Here’s What Getbig’s Connoisseurs Of Combat Have Missed...  (Read 5367 times)

Meta-physical

  • Guest
then why not post under your old account?

why start a gimmick that does long winded posts?


why do any of that?...just to attempt to entertain myself, Joon, Josh Aveshar, that Alex guy and who is that dutch guy?
It's been flushed. Didn't think I'd be back. Dunno who the Dutch guy is - big fan of the other three, though. There's only so much that can be said about men in thongs, Johnny.

Kahn.N.Singh

  • Getbig IV
  • ****
  • Posts: 1122
  • Die Weltgeschichte ist das Weltgericht
Lord Almighty, Meta-Physical is a cultured badass and a saint!

Friends, I think some here are failing to read between the lines of Meta-Physical's posts and are missing his central point that a physicalist ontology of bodybuilding does not control all the ways in which we can appreciate the brotherhood of iron. Look, the untangling of the Gordian knot of muscle will require something outside the bunny suit of nature, something less superficial and more substantive, i.e., something meta-physical. Why? Because muscle is dumb, it does not think and cannot solve any problems, not even those pertaining to muscle itself. What is woven through Meta-Physical's various posts is the nuanced notion that natural bodies are neither necessary nor persistent, so the activity of bodybuilding, which works on muscles, will require the transcendence of muscular existence. In other words, Meta-Physical is stating that 'bodybuilding' gains semantic currency iff it is an active, mental operation rather than having any recognizable ontic reality, and that without this qualification, the term 'bodybuilder' is ontologically vacuous.

Meta-Physical, thank you for your patience, humility, and magnanimous spirit.

Meta-physical

  • Guest
Lord Almighty, Meta-Physical is a cultured badass and a saint!

Friends, I think some here are failing to read between the lines of Meta-Physical's posts and are missing his central point that a physicalist ontology of bodybuilding does not control all the ways in which we can appreciate the brotherhood of iron. Look, the untangling of the Gordian knot of muscle will require something outside the bunny suit of nature, something less superficial and more substantive, i.e., something meta-physical. Why? Because muscle is dumb, it does not think and cannot solve any problems, not even those pertaining to muscle itself. What is woven through Meta-Physical's various posts is the nuanced notion that natural bodies are neither necessary nor persistent, so the activity of bodybuilding, which works on muscles, will require the transcendence of muscular existence. In other words, Meta-Physical is stating that 'bodybuilding' gains semantic currency iff it is an active, mental operation rather than having any recognizable ontic reality, and that without this qualification, the term 'bodybuilder' is ontologically vacuous.

Meta-Physical, thank you for your patience, humility, and magnanimous spirit.


Old friend,

As von Goethe once so eloquently wrote: 'The soul that sees beauty may sometimes walk alone'. The path of the thonged warrior can often feel as futile as it is forsaken, so to be be accompanied on that journey by one so judicious and erudite is as profound a privilege as I could have ever hoped for. You are a pillar of strength and a shining exemplar of integrity. For most, these words may be dismissed as florid and intemperate adulation; for you they are but a modest testimonial.


Taffin

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 17105
  • "De la concha para el culo..."
^^^^

Jeez!  You two need to 'get a room' (perhaps at the Robbins?)

T

Kwon

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 52099
  • PRONOUNS: Ze/Zir
^^^^

Jeez!  You two need to 'get a room' (perhaps at the Robbins?)



The Mirage....
Q

Kahn.N.Singh

  • Getbig IV
  • ****
  • Posts: 1122
  • Die Weltgeschichte ist das Weltgericht
Msssrs. Taffin and Kwon,

Gentlemen, you know as well as I that reciprocal praise between bros (i.e., mutual abbroval) is not always motivated by an alacritous desire to Drasin each other's Sprague.

Taffin

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 17105
  • "De la concha para el culo..."
Msssrs. Taffin and Kwon,

Gentlemen, you know as well as I that reciprocal praise between bros (i.e., mutual abbroval) is not always motivated by an alacritous desire to Drasin each other's Sprague.


Of course.  I was merely suggesting that your intellectual discourse would perhaps find a more suitable and fulfilling 'arena' than that presented by this humble 'forum'.  The Robbins Library being just such an arena....

http://library.harvard.edu/phi
T