I don't buy the shooting yourself with a gun-thing.
Seems like a cover-up
Same here. One of the actresses said that she didn't want to be near him when he was involved with guns. I can see a scenario where he was practicing with the guy who was supposed to shoot him at close range, with only the two of them in some off-room or something, and maybe Jon-Erik moved suddenly, getting a foot closer to the gun - enough to cause damage.
It would be a fairly easy mistake to make - maybe in the script he was supposed to almost get shot, and rather than move away in the right direction, he moved closer to the gun, by mistake. It could well have been in part his fault for doing that [maybe after a long day of shooting], but not the Russian roulette with a blank round scenario [the official narrative]. It seems to me that Jon-Erik knew too much about firearms and the effects of blank rounds to do something like that. Unless he was completely exhausted or extremely drunk or something, but even then...it just seems strange.
From there, maybe with only one or two witnesses to the accident, they made up the blank round scenario, and it wasn't investigated because of the rarity of such accidents, and the reality that Russian roulette exists, and presumably someone could be silly/dumb enough to do that.
And then it just wasn't investigated, and that was that. It wouldn't surprise me if the gun wasn't even checked for prints. And something as simple as Jon-Erik's prints not being on the gun would have cast major doubt on the official narrative. Since he was a rising star, and since a semi-plausible accident story was contrived, the only people motivated to push for an investigation would have been his parents, who had long since divorced, making a unified front to challenge the official narrative fall dead in its tracks.
Unlike when Paris Hilton was in jail but was released because her herpes sores flared up or something. She had the following to help out out. Jon-Erik, being such a new and young star, may not have. And, again, the rarity of an actor being shot and injured [then ultimately killed] by a blank was so unusual that people didn't question it.
Off-topic, but it makes me wonder about the Bill Gates vaccine story from India. Supposedly, his vaccines killed many Indian children. Some say no, but here's the question - who would advocate for a few thousand, or even 10,000+ poor Indian children? On one hand, it seems like a lot to cover up, but again - who cares enough about impoverished Indian children to do anything about it? And if their parents were paid off, and if children from broken homes or from homes with abusive parents were taken for testing of Gates' new vaccine [an oral-based Polio vaccine, I believe], who would advocate for them?
I think there are sometimes plausible reasons why seemingly conspiratorial things don't get investigated, and Jon-Erik's death may have been one of them.
He may possibly be the best looking man ever. Epic Scandinavian genetics.
