We not only have fake news but also fake cancer treatment! Story of B17

[el numero uno]

What type of cancer was it?

Here's a success story apparently. The medical establishment will come after doctors that are open to B17 treatment in the same way the main stream media is coming after Trump!

Look, Galileo.

That's not how you prove something works.

In this Covid-19 situation some idiots have been drinking bleach and claiming it works cause they either didn't get sick, or got sick but beat the disease. You could replace bleach for orange juice and nothing stops you from concluding orange juice it's effective against Covid. Of course, such conclusion would be idiotic.

You need to randomly assign the treatments, and then compare the results to the group with no treatment or placebo, and the other treatments among themselves as well. That's the only way you can control variables that will likely affect the results, because each group has the same chance of being affected by confounding variables when they're randomly assigned.

Anecdotal evidence is not used to conclude x or y medicine works because you didn't control for confounding variables.

[Humble Narcissist]

Look how mouthy the little fairy is while hiding behind a keyboard. You're a pussy. And you know it.

How am I supposed to send my posts, by passenger pigeon?  Pony Express?

[obsidian]

Look, Galileo.

That's not how you prove something works.

In this Covid-19 situation some idiots have been drinking bleach and claiming it works cause they either didn't get sick, or got sick but beat the disease. You could replace bleach for orange juice and nothing stops you from concluding orange juice it's effective against Covid. Of course, such conclusion would be idiotic.

You need to randomly assign the treatments, and then compare the results to the group with no treatment or placebo, and the other treatments among themselves as well. That's the only way you can control variables that will likely affect the results, because each group has the same chance of being affected by confounding variables when they're randomly assigned.

Anecdotal evidence is not used to conclude x or y medicine works because you didn't control for confounding variables.

Oh yeah tough guy?! And traditional cancer treatment is that great and successful?!

I'll eat an apricot kernel or apple seed just in case!

Here read this!

“Dr. Ian MacDonald and Dr. Henry Garland [also] wrote the famous 1953 report of the California Medical Association that since has become the basis of almost all scientific opposition to Laetrile/B17. It was learned later, however, that the findings on this report had been FALSIFIED. Both of these doctors defended cigarette smoking as a harmless pastime unrelated to lung cancer. Dr. MacDonald had publicly stated: ‘A pack a day keeps lung cancer away’" (World Without Cancer pg. 129). And here was God's justice: Dr. MacDonald died in his bed from one of his cigarettes, and Dr. Garland died from lung cancer (obviously he didn't truly study B17 or he would have used it).

[obsidian]

Prostate cancer.

Ok, well congrats. My father-in law also has that and his surgery also worked. I did however read that your type of cancer is the easier one to deal with. How about lung cancer? Some treatments call for cutting out one of the lungs! No thanks! I'll try my luck with B17 / Cannibis Oil!