The US now easing in to a dictatorship - Civic Integrity Policy

[Matt]

And why are homos forcing Christian bakers to bake them wedding cakes?

This is why I'm done playing this game.

Jews, women, people of colour, all the diversity of the rainbow 🌈 [!] are welcome in my life.

It's just that I swear to God, I'll slit their fucking throats if they do.

What the fuck are you going to do about it?

[OneMoreRep]

We know what masters he serves.





"1"

[OneMoreRep]

This is why I'm done playing this game.

Jews, women, people of colour, all the diversity of the rainbow 🌈 [!] are welcome in my life.

It's just that I swear to God, I'll slit their fucking throats if they do.

What the fuck are you going to do about it?

My gosh Matty, relax brother. We're all civilized here my man. No need to slit any throats bro.

Jason Stern tried this shit with me.

None of that changes the fact that Jews are the #1 driving force pushing Whites to minority status in Western society. So cut the shit about how as an individual Jew, you are powerless.

I couldn't help but notice you say NOTHING each time some White Guilt "woke" curriculum is being forced on White people. Most recently in a third grade math class in Missouri.. Meanwhile, WHAT THE FUCK DOES A 7-YEAR-OLD WHITE CHILD HAVE TO DO WITH THAT?

Answer THAT one, OneMoreRep.

What's wrong with Jason Stern? Wasn't he funny?

Matt, I am not here to save the world. I can only do my part as an individual to change the cycle of hate, by embracing people of all backgrounds and beliefs.

I do my part here on GetBig.

"1"

[Matt]

My gosh Matty, relax brother. We're all civilized here my man. No need to slit any throats bro.

What's wrong with Jason Stern? Wasn't he funny?

Matt, I am not here to save the world. I can only do my part as an individual to change the cycle of hate, by embracing people of all backgrounds and beliefs.

I do my part here on GetBig.

"1"

You and I are cool, OneMoreRep. We met before I became racially aware, and I'm not going to retroactively cancel diversity out of my life, as the reverse is done - such as Chris Hart [the Black actor in Grudge Match - I think his name is Chris] was cancelled for saying phaggot with an F on Twitter... probably ten years ago.

But I want you to understand my "No Jews Allowed" policy is based in something rational. Take this case of an Indigenous woman [who turned out to be 21, and not 17], who repeatedly spat on a White female police officer.

No Crown Attorney would touch this case, because it was bullshit, and the cop herself was assaulted. In a FAIR world, the Indigenous WOMAN [not teen] would have been charged.

But no.

Not only was she not charged - but the White female police officer who was ASSAULTED by the piece of shit was charged! Only under the bullshit Ontario Police Services Act, but still:

https://www.google.com/amp/s/globalnews.ca/news/5946328/thunder-bay-police-officer-charged/amp

So let me get this straight:

If a woman, Jew, or "person of colour" assaults me, and I DEFEND MYSELF, *I* will be assaulted.

That's when I decided I'm no longer going to be involved with "protected groups". I'm supposed to accept not being legally allowed self-defense? Fuck that.

People can have any excuse they have to not speak to any one. But my inability to legally defend myself is not "any excuse". It's a completely valid one.

When I stop hearing of cases of White people getting in trouble for defending themselves, and FIVE YEARS passes of fairness, I will CONSIDER speaking to protected groups again.

Until then, no chance.

I would change my mind through torture, threat of murder, etc. That's about it.

[Walter Sobchak]

You and I are cool, OneMoreRep. We met before I became racially aware, and I'm not going to retroactively cancel diversity out of my life, as the reverse is done - such as Chris Hart [the Black actor in Grudge Match - I think his name is Chris] was cancelled for saying phaggot with an F on Twitter... probably ten years ago.

But I want you to understand my "No Jews Allowed" policy is based in something rational. Take this case of an Indigenous woman [who turned out to be 21, and not 17], who repeatedly spat on a White female police officer.

No Crown Attorney would touch this case, because it was bullshit, and the cop herself was assaulted. In a FAIR world, the Indigenous WOMAN [not teen] would have been charged.

But no.

Not only was she not charged - but the White female police officer who was ASSAULTED by the piece of shit was charged! Only under the bullshit Ontario Police Services Act, but still:

https://www.google.com/amp/s/globalnews.ca/news/5946328/thunder-bay-police-officer-charged/amp

So let me get this straight:

If a woman, Jew, or "person of colour" assaults me, and I DEFEND MYSELF, *I* will be assaulted.

That's when I decided I'm no longer going to be involved with "protected groups". I'm supposed to accept not being legally allowed self-defense? Fuck that.

People can have any excuse they have to not speak to any one. But my inability to legally defend myself is not "any excuse". It's a completely valid one.

When I stop hearing of cases of White people getting in trouble for defending themselves, and FIVE YEARS passes of fairness, I will CONSIDER speaking to protected groups again.

Until then, no chance.

I would change my mind through torture, threat of murder, etc. That's about it.

Holy fuck.

Listen to your Doctor.

Take your medicine.

Turn off the internet for a few days and try to get a little bit of a grasp of reality.

[_bruce_]

Matt is right in parts but he has to take into account that most of the struggle in the modern world is a class struggle and racial struggle has been maximized via corporate tactics. Most people self segregate according to various criteria - after all we are tribal. We are designed to cooperate with equals to survive.

Lower level jews are mostly canon fodder - see Israel which is a hodge podge of differently blooded choochoos(social standing often determined by skin color) sitting in a desert... which beneficial "superjew" would put his "brothers" in a sand castle? I love how all the wealthy choos live abroad(US/Europe of course) and maybe have a nice appartments/houses in "pink" Tel Aviv... it's easy to be in favor of something you do not have to endure. It's also a shame that Germany had to be destroyed for a postage stamp sized experiment.

[Gregzs]

[Ron]

This is Twitter's Civic Integrity Policy

Basically, any ballot measure that they think you are 'misleading' the liberal agenda, you will be suspended or banned.  Anytime you wish to debate or talk about a ballot or measure that is not in the correct 'thinking' mode, you will be suspended or banned.  You are not allowed any free speech when it appears to 'mislead' any measure or ballot, or if you decided later on to talk about an outcome that was not to your liking, bye bye.

The days of free speech and thought is becoming dangerously close to going away.  Say something someone doesnt like, and they will go after you with bullying, calls, bad reviews and more, and then suspend you. Wow.



This is Twitter's Civic Integrity Policy

Civic integrity policy
Overview
January 2021

You may not use Twitter’s services for the purpose of manipulating or interfering in elections or other civic processes. This includes posting or sharing content that may suppress participation or mislead people about when, where, or how to participate in a civic process. In addition, we may label and reduce the visibility of Tweets containing false or misleading information about civic processes in order to provide additional context.

The public conversation occurring on Twitter is never more important than during elections and other civic events. Any attempts to undermine the integrity of our service is antithetical to our fundamental rights and undermines the core tenets of freedom of expression, the value upon which our company is based.

We believe we have a responsibility to protect the integrity of those conversations from interference and manipulation. Therefore, we prohibit attempts to use our services to manipulate or disrupt civic processes, including through the distribution of false or misleading information about the procedures or circumstances around participation in a civic process. In instances where misleading information does not seek to directly manipulate or disrupt civic processes, but leads to confusion on our service, we may label the Tweets to give additional context.

What is a civic process?
Twitter considers civic processes to be events or procedures mandated, organized, and conducted by the governing and/or electoral body of a country, state, region, district, or municipality to address a matter of common concern through public participation. Some examples of civic processes may include:

Political elections
Censuses
Major referenda and ballot initiatives

[AbrahamG]

He is #winning.  Joe Biden = MAGA. 

[Straw Man]

Here we go...

https://www.tmz.com/2021/01/26/mypillow-ceo-mike-lindell-banned-from-twitter/

Trumptards are hilarious

Fuck that stupid coke-head Traitor

[WeightPSHR]

This is Twitter's Civic Integrity Policy

Basically, any ballot measure that they think you are 'misleading' the liberal agenda, you will be suspended or banned.  Anytime you wish to debate or talk about a ballot or measure that is not in the correct 'thinking' mode, you will be suspended or banned.  You are not allowed any free speech when it appears to 'mislead' any measure or ballot, or if you decided later on to talk about an outcome that was not to your liking, bye bye.

The days of free speech and thought is becoming dangerously close to going away.  Say something someone doesnt like, and they will go after you with bullying, calls, bad reviews and more, and then suspend you. Wow.



This is Twitter's Civic Integrity Policy

Civic integrity policy
Overview
January 2021

You may not use Twitter’s services for the purpose of manipulating or interfering in elections or other civic processes. This includes posting or sharing content that may suppress participation or mislead people about when, where, or how to participate in a civic process. In addition, we may label and reduce the visibility of Tweets containing false or misleading information about civic processes in order to provide additional context.

The public conversation occurring on Twitter is never more important than during elections and other civic events. Any attempts to undermine the integrity of our service is antithetical to our fundamental rights and undermines the core tenets of freedom of expression, the value upon which our company is based.

We believe we have a responsibility to protect the integrity of those conversations from interference and manipulation. Therefore, we prohibit attempts to use our services to manipulate or disrupt civic processes, including through the distribution of false or misleading information about the procedures or circumstances around participation in a civic process. In instances where misleading information does not seek to directly manipulate or disrupt civic processes, but leads to confusion on our service, we may label the Tweets to give additional context.

What is a civic process?
Twitter considers civic processes to be events or procedures mandated, organized, and conducted by the governing and/or electoral body of a country, state, region, district, or municipality to address a matter of common concern through public participation. Some examples of civic processes may include:

Political elections
Censuses
Major referenda and ballot initiatives

BIG Libtard Tech will also prevent you from spinning up any new platforms to circumvent these policies.

If this country is not in a civil war in the  next 4 years I'd be surprised. Racism and hate are the highest I've even seen in my life.

[WeightPSHR]

Trumptards are hilarious

Fuck that stupid coke-head Traitor

You better be careful talking about Hunter Biden in that manner....

Big Tech is watching

[mphgrove]

Well said and that's exactly what is happening. Big Tech has always been a wolf in sheeps clothing.

The Europeans (e.g., Angela Merkel in Germany) think that the government (rather than the companies themselves) should be the ones policing what happens on social media (according to “very clearly defined criteria”, they say). Isn’t that an even riskier proposition? It is unclear what is the best solution to speech monitoring on social media.

People talk about “breaking the companies up into smaller units”, but what exactly does that accomplish? And doing what Trump wanted (letting the companies be sued right and left) seems like that would stifle speech rather than liberate it.

Total conundrum. Just stay off Twitter and Facebook is the best advice.

[WeightPSHR]

The Europeans (e.g., Angela Merkel in Germany) think that the government (rather than the companies themselves) should be the ones policing what happens on social media (according to “very clearly defined criteria”, they say). Isn’t that an even riskier proposition? It is unclear what is the best solution to speech monitoring on social media.

People talk about “breaking the companies up into smaller units”, but what exactly does that accomplish? And doing what Trump wanted (letting the companies be sued right and left) seems like that would stifle speech rather than liberate it.

Total conundrum. Just stay off Twitter and Facebook is the best advice.

Agreed. If people stopped using social media their power would end.

I've never had any social media and I'm just fine. I don't need the likes from fake online friends. My true firends can find me.

[TheGrinch]

WOOOOOOSSHHHH

18-Year-Old College Student Turns His Father in to FBI, Gets $138K on GoFundMe

https://needtoknow.news/2021/01/18-year-old-college-student-turns-his-father-in-to-fbi-gets-138k-on-gofundme/



In 1984, the Junior Spies is the name of a youth organization run by the Party. Its primary aim is to keep an eye out on any adults, not just parents, who might be guilty of disloyalty or treason.

[Humble Narcissist]

This is why I'm glad I don't have kids.  No matter how well you raise them they may be brainwashed into some soy boy faggotry.