Author Topic: SMART  (Read 649 times)

funk51

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 40416
  • Getbig!
SMART
« on: September 10, 2021, 06:28:02 AM »
 
&t=99s
F

Marty Champions

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 36464
Re: SMART
« Reply #1 on: September 10, 2021, 06:44:02 AM »
A

funk51

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 40416
  • Getbig!
Re: SMART
« Reply #2 on: September 11, 2021, 11:24:12 AM »
How Trump Steered Supporters Into Unwitting Donations
Online donors were guided into weekly recurring contributions. Demands for refunds spiked. Complaints to banks and credit card companies soared. But the money helped keep Donald Trump’s struggling campaign afloat.



1620

Recurring donations swelled former President Donald J. Trump’s campaign coffers in September and October, just as his operation’s finances were deteriorating.
Recurring donations swelled former President Donald J. Trump’s campaign coffers in September and October, just as his operation’s finances were deteriorating.Credit...D oug Mills/The New York Times
Shane Goldmacher
By Shane Goldmacher
Published April 3, 2021
Updated Aug. 7, 2021
Stacy Blatt was in hospice care last September listening to Rush Limbaugh’s dire warnings about how badly Donald J. Trump’s campaign needed money when he went online and chipped in everything he could: $500.

It was a big sum for a 63-year-old battling cancer and living in Kansas City on less than $1,000 per month. But that single contribution — federal records show it was his first ever — quickly multiplied. Another $500 was withdrawn the next day, then $500 the next week and every week through mid-October, without his knowledge — until Mr. Blatt’s bank account had been depleted and frozen. When his utility and rent payments bounced, he called his brother, Russell, for help.

What the Blatts soon discovered was $3,000 in withdrawals by the Trump campaign in less than 30 days. They called their bank and said they thought they were victims of fraud.

“It felt,” Russell said, “like it was a scam.”

But what the Blatts believed was duplicity was actually an intentional scheme to boost revenues by the Trump campaign and the for-profit company that processed its online donations, WinRed. Facing a cash crunch and getting badly outspent by the Democrats, the campaign had begun last September to set up recurring donations by default for online donors, for every week until the election.

ADVERTISEMENT

Continue reading the main story

Contributors had to wade through a fine-print disclaimer and manually uncheck a box to opt out.

As the election neared, the Trump team made that disclaimer increasingly opaque, an investigation by The New York Times showed. It introduced a second prechecked box, known internally as a “money bomb,” that doubled a person’s contribution. Eventually its solicitations featured lines of text in bold and capital letters that overwhelmed the opt-out language.

The tactic ensnared scores of unsuspecting Trump loyalists — retirees, military veterans, nurses and even experienced political operatives. Soon, banks and credit card companies were inundated with fraud complaints from the president’s own supporters about donations they had not intended to make, sometimes for thousands of dollars.

“Bandits!” said Victor Amelino, a 78-year-old Californian, who made a $990 online donation to Mr. Trump in early September via WinRed. It recurred seven more times — adding up to almost $8,000. “I’m retired. I can’t afford to pay all that damn money.”

The sheer magnitude of the money involved is staggering for politics. In the final two and a half months of 2020, the Trump campaign, the Republican National Committee and their shared accounts issued more than 530,000 refunds worth $64.3 million to online donors. All campaigns make refunds for various reasons, including to people who give more than the legal limit. But the sum the Trump operation refunded dwarfed that of Joseph R. Biden Jr.’s campaign and his equivalent Democratic committees, which made 37,000 online refunds totaling $5.6 million in that time.

The recurring donations swelled Mr. Trump’s treasury in September and October, just as his finances were deteriorating. He was then able to use tens of millions of dollars he raised after the election, under the guise of fighting his unfounded fraud claims, to help cover the refunds he owed.

Editors’ Picks

Why Did Two People So Poorly Matched Stay Together So Long?

To Survive the Pandemic, a Secret Nintendo Cafe Is Secret No Longer

There’s Always Been More to Kirsten Dunst
Continue reading the main story
ADVERTISEMENT

Continue reading the main story

In effect, the money that Mr. Trump eventually had to refund amounted to an interest-free loan from unwitting supporters at the most important juncture of the 2020 race.


Image
Russell Blatt’s brother, Stacy, who was a supporter of Mr. Trump, died of cancer in February.
Russell Blatt’s brother, Stacy, who was a supporter of Mr. Trump, died of cancer in February. Credit...Katie Currid for The New York Times
Marketers have long used ruses like prechecked boxes to steer American consumers into unwanted purchases, like magazine subscriptions. But consumer advocates said deploying the practice on voters in the heat of a presidential campaign — at such volume and with withdrawals every week — had much more serious ramifications.

“It’s unfair, it’s unethical and it’s inappropriate,” said Ira Rheingold, the executive director of the National Association of Consumer Advocates.

Harry Brignull, a user-experience designer in London who coined the term “dark patterns” for manipulative digital marketing practices, said the Trump team’s techniques were a classic of the “deceptive design” genre.

“It should be in textbooks of what you shouldn’t do,” he said.

Political strategists, digital operatives and campaign finance experts said they could not recall ever seeing refunds at such a scale. Mr. Trump, the R.N.C. and their shared accounts refunded far more money to online donors in the last election cycle than every federal Democratic candidate and committee in the country combined.

ADVERTISEMENT

Continue reading the main story

Over all, the Trump operation refunded 10.7 percent of the money it raised on WinRed in 2020; the Biden operation’s refund rate on ActBlue, the parallel Democratic online donation-processing platform, was 2.2 percent, federal records show.

How Refunds to Trump Donors Soared in 2020
Refunds are shown as the percentage of money received by each operation to date via WinRed and ActBlue.


Trump

By September, the Trump operation began to have online donations recur weekly by default.

10%

By June, the Trump operation and the R.N.C. had added a second pre-filled check box.

8

Around March 2020, the pre-filled check box first appeared on Mr. Trump’s online donation form.

6

4

Biden

2

0

Jan. 2020

Feb.

March

April

May

June

July

Aug.

Sept.

Oct.

Nov.

Dec.

Total online refunds in 2020, in millions

$122

Trump

$21

Biden

Note: Donations and refunds to former President Donald J. Trump include those made via WinRed for the following organizations: Donald J. Trump for President, Inc., Trump Victory, Trump Make America Great Again Committee, Save America, and the Republican National Committee. Donations and refunds to President Biden include those made via ActBlue for the following groups: Biden for President, Biden Victory Fund, Biden Action Fund, Biden Fight Fund, and the Democratic National Committee.Source: WinRed and ActBlueBy Eleanor Lutz and Rachel Shorey
Several bank representatives who fielded fraud claims directly from consumers estimated that WinRed cases, at their peak, represented as much as 1 to 3 percent of their workload. An executive for one of the nation’s larger credit-card issuers confirmed that WinRed at its height accounted for a similar percentage of its formal disputes.

That figure may seem small at first glance, but financial experts said it was a shockingly large percentage, considering that political donations represent a tiny fraction of the overall United States economy.

In its investigation, The Times reviewed filings with the Federal Election Commission from the Trump and Biden campaigns and their shared accounts with political parties, as well as the donation-processing sites ActBlue and WinRed, compiling a database of refunds issued by day. The Times also interviewed two dozen Trump donors who made recurring donations, as well as campaign officials, campaign finance experts and consumer advocates. Nearly a dozen bank and credit card officials from the nation’s leading financial institutions spoke for this article on the condition of anonymity to discuss internal matters.

A clear pattern emerged. Donors typically said they intended to give once or twice and only later discovered on their bank statements and credit card bills that they were donating over and over again. Some, like Mr. Blatt, who died of cancer in February, sought an injunction from their banks and credit cards. Others pursued refunds directly from WinRed, which typically granted them to avoid more costly formal disputes.

WinRed said that every donor receives at least one follow-up email about pending repeat donations in advance and that the company makes it “exceptionally easy,” with 24-hour customer service, for people to request their money back. “WinRed wants donors to be happy, and puts a premium on customer support,” said Gerrit Lansing, WinRed’s president. “Donors are the lifeblood of G.O.P. campaigns.” He noted that Democrats and ActBlue had also used recurring programs.

Jason Miller, a spokesman for Mr. Trump, downplayed the rash of fraud complaints and the $122.7 million in total refunds issued by the Trump operation. He said internal records showed that 0.87 percent of its WinRed transactions had been subject to formal credit card disputes. “The fact we had a dispute rate of less than 1 percent of total donations despite raising more grass-roots money than any campaign in history is remarkable,” he said.

ADVERTISEMENT

Continue reading the main story

That still amounts to about 200,000 disputed transactions that Mr. Miller said added up to $19.7 million.

“Our campaign was built by the hardworking men and women of America,” Mr. Miller said, “and cherishing their investments was paramount to anything else we did.”

Asked if Mr. Trump had been aware of his operation’s use of recurring payments, the campaign did not respond.

Mr. Trump’s hyperaggressive fund-raising practices did not stop once he lost the election. His campaign continued the weekly withdrawals through prechecked boxes all the way through Dec. 14 as he raised tens of millions of dollars for his new political action committee, Save America.

In March, Mr. Trump urged his followers to send their money to him — and not to the traditional party apparatus — making plain that he intends to remain the gravitational center of Republican fund-raising online.

A small yellow box and a flood of fraud complaints
The small and bright yellow box popped up on Mr. Trump’s digital donation portal around March 2020. The text was boldface, simple and straightforward: “Make this a monthly recurring donation.”

The box came prefilled with a check mark.


F

funk51

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 40416
  • Getbig!
Re: SMART
« Reply #3 on: September 11, 2021, 11:25:35 AM »
Trump Campaign Reportedly Forced To Refund More Than $122 Million To Donors
Tommy Beer
Tommy BeerForbes Staff
Business
Follow
TOPLINE Former President Donald Trump's reelection campaign issued a staggering sum of $122.7 million in refunds to supporters in 2020, giving back nearly 11% of the money it raised, according to an investigative report published by the New York Times on Saturday based on an analysis of Federal Election Commission filings.
Trump US Lebanon
Last September, the Trump campaign reportedly began to initiate the use of pre-checked recurring ...
  • ASSOCIATED PRESS

KEY FACTS
Beginning last summer, the Trump campaign and the company that processed its online donations, WinRed, began to initiate the use of pre-checked recurring payment boxes while processing online offerings, Times analysis revealed.

According to the report, unless donors inspected the fine print of an online disclaimer and manually unchecked an opt-out box, the donor's credit card would be charged weekly until Election Day arrived.

PROMOTED




In the lead-up to the election, the campaign "made that disclaimer increasingly opaque," the Times asserts, and eventually added a second pre-checked box that automatically doubled a donor's contribution.

Eventually, financial institutions became "inundated with fraud complaints" from Trump supporters who unknowingly agreed to these recurring charges.

According to the Times, several banks and one of the nation's larger credit-card companies confirmed that, at one point late in 2020, these cases accounted for up to 3% of all fraud complaints received.

Forbes has reached out to Trump's representatives for comment but did not immediately hear back.

CONTRA:
Trump spokesperson Jason Miller rebuffed the claims of widespread fraud, telling the Times internal data determined 0.87% of its WinRed transactions were subject to "formal" credit card disputes. "The fact we had a dispute rate of less than 1% of total donations despite raising more grass-roots money than any campaign in history is remarkable," Miller said.

KEY BACKGROUND:
Despite Trump's defeat on Nov. 3, the campaign's push for contributions did not die down. Claiming, without evidence, that the election had been stolen, Trump urged his supporters to fund his efforts to "Stop The Steal." According to Federal Election Commission filings released in January from WinRed, Trump garnered $255.4 million in political donations from his supporters in the eight weeks following the 2020 election. Trump and the Republican National Committee raised more than $2 million daily on WinRed from early November through Dec. 14, the day of the Electoral College vote. Email requests were a crucial component of Trump's requests for cash. CNN reported that the former president's campaign sent more than 400 emails and 130 text messages appealing for donations in the first 30 days after the election.

TANGENT:
The Times analysis of FEC filings determined that the Biden campaign’s refund rate on donations was 2.2% in 2020.

CRUCIAL QUOTE:
"It felt like it was a scam," Russell Blatt told the Times after his family realized that $3,000 had been withdrawn from the account of his brother, Stacy, who was battling cancer and living on less than $1,000 per month.

BIG NUMBER:
$720,000. That was the average daily amount the Trump operation refunded to donors in December.

FURTHER READING:
How Trump Steered Supporters Into Unwitting Donations (NYT)

Trump Raised $250 Million Since Election To Challenge Outcome—Here's Where Most Of The Money Will Actually Go (Forbes)     ::) ::) ::) ::)

F

Humble Narcissist

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 28504
Re: SMART
« Reply #4 on: September 12, 2021, 02:29:38 AM »
TDS still effecting the retards of Getbig.

Body-Buildah

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 4959
  • Creepy Joe Touches Kids
Re: SMART
« Reply #5 on: September 12, 2021, 03:08:57 AM »
Joe could be burning down the country, hardcore libturdz will still be trying to post and whine about Trump online, severe mental illness.
Move on, he's gone, we got a new (brain-dead) sheriff in town, regardless of Party, true Americans with nuts would want this destructive clown removed from Oval Orifice.

-

Demturd-><-Coma Patients

funk51

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 40416
  • Getbig!
Re: SMART
« Reply #6 on: September 12, 2021, 06:12:20 AM »
     
F

funk51

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 40416
  • Getbig!
Re: SMART
« Reply #7 on: September 12, 2021, 02:33:09 PM »
TDS still effecting the retards of Getbig.
   not really, this is more a public service announcement to his followers if you contributed you might want to uncheck the pre checked box authorizing recurring payments. otherwise he could eventually bleed you dry like he did the cancer patient.
F