5 people referenced Joe Biden as the “Big Guy”

[Coach is Back!]

https://www.breitbart.com/politics/2023/07/30/5-people-referenced-joe-biden-big-guy/

[Primemuscle]

Wow! Only five people said that? I would have guessed more. Seems he is not as big as some folks think.

Joe is somewhat tall at 6' compared to the average for his age which is 5'9". However, I read he weighs 159 lbs. so he is something of a lightweight... not what I would consider as being a big guy. He is the President of the United States and that is pretty much a 'big guy' by many people's standards.

So as compared to you, he is a very big guy both in height and position... but not in weight to height ratio. You have him beat there. 

Trump is an even bigger guy. He recently claimed to be 6'2" and 240 lbs. I would have guessed he weighed more than that. Maybe stomach fat doesn't weigh that much, I wouldn't know.

[Coach is Back!]

Wow! Only five people said that? I would have guessed more. Seems he is not as big as some folks think.

Joe is somewhat tall at 6' compared to the average for his age which is 5'9". However, I read he weighs 159 lbs. so he is something of a lightweight... not what I would consider as being a big guy. He is the President of the United States and that is pretty much a 'big guy' by many people's standards.

So as compared to you, he is a very big guy both in height and position... but not in weight to height ratio. You have him beat there. 

Trump is an even bigger guy. He recently claimed to be 6'2" and 240 lbs. I would have guessed he weighed more than that. Maybe stomach fat doesn't weigh that much, I wouldn't know.

You really stick up and defend wannabe communist “leaders” don’t you?

[Primemuscle]

You really stick up and defend wannabe communist “leaders” don’t you?

I don't know what you are on tonight, but it must be some good stuff (mushrooms maybe?) because you are obviously hallucinating.

Maybe read the title of your thread again. A grand total of "5 people referenced Joe Biden and the "Big Guy"... Seriously, is that ridiculous hearsay supposed to be concerning to the rest of us?       


I don't know what you are on tonight but it must be some good stuff (mushrooms maybe?) because you are obviously hallucinating.

Maybe read the title of your thread again. A grand total of "5 people referenced Joe Biden and the "Big Guy"... Seriously, is that hearsay supposed to be concerning to the rest of us? 

[Agnostic007]

I'll say this.. the truth is what is important. If the GOP can establish legitimate proof Biden did anything illegal, let's go to court... Get every Alphabet agency involved, leave no stone unturned. If Biden did anything illegal fry him. If the DOJ or FBI find credible charges, go for it. You will NOT hear me say it's a witch hunt if either of those are involved. Heck, even an special prosecutor I will go with, even a Trump appointed official. Let's get to the truth.

[LurkerNoMore]

I'll say this.. the truth is what is important. If the GOP can establish legitimate proof Biden did anything illegal, let's go to court... Get every Alphabet agency involved, leave no stone unturned. If Biden did anything illegal fry him. If the DOJ or FBI find credible charges, go for it. You will NOT hear me say it's a witch hunt if either of those are involved. Heck, even an special prosecutor I will go with, even a Trump appointed official. Let's get to the truth.

Sounds reasonable.  Quite fair actually.  Wonder why the other side doesn't get behind this when it's their guy actually breaking the law?

This is the difference between the right and the left. The left has the evidence and is bringing charges against Trump, after a couple years. The right has no evidence and is unable to indict, after 7 years. Instead all they have is a bunch of whining and moronic calls for public executions of their opposition.  Classic apples and oranges. Democrats get it done because they have evidence and republicans can't get past the investigation because they have no evidence.  Really no surprise at all.

[SOMEPARTS]

If the DOJ or FBI find credible charges

LOL!

[Grape Ape]

I'll say this.. the truth is what is important. If the GOP can establish legitimate proof Biden did anything illegal, let's go to court... Get every Alphabet agency involved, leave no stone unturned. If Biden did anything illegal fry him. If the DOJ or FBI find credible charges, go for it. You will NOT hear me say it's a witch hunt if either of those are involved. Heck, even an special prosecutor I will go with, even a Trump appointed official. Let's get to the truth.

x2.

[Primemuscle]

I'll say this.. the truth is what is important. If the GOP can establish legitimate proof Biden did anything illegal, let's go to court... Get every Alphabet agency involved, leave no stone unturned. If Biden did anything illegal fry him. If the DOJ or FBI find credible charges, go for it. You will NOT hear me say it's a witch hunt if either of those are involved. Heck, even an special prosecutor I will go with, even a Trump appointed official. Let's get to the truth.

With regards to some House Republicans proposed Biden impeachment, there is a certain irony, and this is that the Democrat controlled Senate won't uphold it. Does this seem familiar. Since turnabout is fair play, at least Biden's detractors could go around reminding people that Biden was in fact impeached just as some anti-Trump folks did when he was impeached.

In Trump's second impeachment, 10 GOP members joined the Democrats with votes to impeach Trump. In the first impeachment the vote was strictly along party lines.

How many of the 222 House Republicans would vote to impeach Biden? Do you think it would be all of them or do you think some Republican Reps would vote against impeachment, risking the wrath of the public. It seems highly unlikely that any house Democrats would vote for his impeachment not that they would need to.

Imagining the possibilities of a Biden impeachment being confirmed by the Senate is even more nail biting since the split is 50/50 with VP Harris breaking a tie.

[Grape Ape]

With regards to some House Republicans proposed Biden impeachment, there is a certain irony, and this is that the Democrat controlled Senate won't uphold it. Does this seem familiar. Since turnabout is fair play, at least Biden's detractors could go around reminding people that Biden was in fact impeached just as some anti-Trump folks did when he was impeached.

In Trump's second impeachment, 10 GOP members joined the Democrats with votes to impeach Trump. In the first impeachment the vote was strictly along party lines.

How many of the 222 House Republicans would vote to impeach Biden? Do you think it would be all of them or do you think some Republican Reps would vote against impeachment, risking the wrath of the public. It seems highly unlikely that any house Democrats would vote for his impeachment not that they would need to.

Imagining the possibilities of a Biden impeachment being confirmed by the Senate is even more nail biting since the split is 50/50 with VP Harris breaking a tie.

Pelosi knew the same thing on the Ukraine call, and still went through with it.  By impeaching for something so ridiculous and impossible to prove, the stage was set for turnaround.  It was a big mistake by the Democrats....not sure why Pelosi caved.

The accusations against Biden are much more sinister, and appear to be gathering more and more evidence.  If it IS irrefutable, the Democrats might not vote party lines.

[Primemuscle]

Pelosi knew the same thing on the Ukraine call, and still went through with it.  By impeaching for something so ridiculous and impossible to prove, the stage was set for turnaround.  It was a big mistake by the Democrats....not sure why Pelosi caved.

The accusations against Biden are much more sinister, and appear to be gathering more and more evidence.  If it IS irrefutable, the Democrats might not vote party lines.

Hope you don't mind if I wait until more and more 'evidence' is validated, (is irrefutable) before deciding how Democrats might vote.

It is my opinion that in 2020 both President Biden and Trump were already too old for the office of President of the United States. Three years later and headed toward four, my opinion has strengthened. Add to this, an increasing belief that Trump is also completely insane. If I had my druthers, we'd have better candidates to vote for. What's more, I wasn't all that keen on HRC in 2016. She was just the better choice of two not very good ones.

Unfortunately, I don't see either party offering up better candidates before the voters are faced with another impossible dilemma. 'Holding Out for a Hero - Where have all the good men (and women) gone'. 

[Coach is Back!]

https://www.foxnews.com/politics/devon-archer-confirms-joe-biden-lied-about-knowledge-hunters-business-dealings-comer-says

[Coach is Back!]

https://nypost.com/2023/07/31/devon-archer-reveals-exactly-what-hunter-was-selling-joe-biden/?utm_campaign=iphone_nyp&utm_source=pasteboard_app

[Coach is Back!]

https://twitter.com/sayflorida/status/1686148150258769920?s=46&t=XiPzOUmtpsEiVS5zhlJE2g

[Agnostic007]

Pelosi knew the same thing on the Ukraine call, and still went through with it. By impeaching for something so ridiculous and impossible to prove, the stage was set for turnaround.  It was a big mistake by the Democrats....not sure why Pelosi caved.

The accusations against Biden are much more sinister, and appear to be gathering more and more evidence.  If it IS irrefutable, the Democrats might not vote party lines.

You lost me here. Can you embellish on what you were saying? 

[Agnostic007]

https://www.msn.com/en-us/news/politics/devon-archer-hunter-biden-s-former-business-partner-testifies-before-house-panel/ar-AA1eBzlD?OCID=ansmsnnews11

It seems that there are two sides to the story at the moment. The republicans are saying the fact Hunter took calls from his father during business meetings, or made calls to his father during business meetings is an implication of guilt. Even when their star witness states Biden was just pleasant, exchanged pleasantries and no business was discussed.

Democrats are saying the fact Biden called his son (almost daily according to the Fox article) and at times those calls where when his son happened to be in business meetings is not an issue because it was always pleasantries, no business was discussed.

From reading both parties spin... what is likely the truth? Seems to me, on the sinister side, Hunter Biden was absolutely using those calls to his advantage. But Bidens claims he didn't know what his son was up to is just as likely to be true as both sides have said, no business was discussed during those calls.

One could argue, it was all calculated.. Joe Biden knew just his voice would be enough to achieve whatever goal Hunter was trying to achieve.. maybe so.. but it could just as well be likely Joe Biden was being used by his son for leverage.

I will be interested to hear when the interview comes out, what transpired. What crime occurred.