What was Affleck thinking or was he drunk again?

[OneMoreRep]

Affirmative Action, diversity, and wokeness.

I recall her stint as a dancer on In Living Color. She struck me as reminiscent of many inner-city Puerto Rican girls from New York during the 70s to the 90s. If you frequented NYC during that era, you'd find girls like her everywhere, especially in certain neighborhoods like the Bronx, El Barrio, Lower East Side, and parts of Brooklyn. Consequently, her facial features didn't strike me as particularly unique. Beyond her face, I found her body proportions lacking (awkward legs, angular elbows, a posterior better suited for a middle-aged mother). It perplexed me why she garnered so much acclaim for her physical appearance. Shifting away from her looks, her vocal abilities were subpar, often replaced by voiceovers from other singers. So what remained? Her dancing. Undoubtedly, she had skill in that department, but so did countless other inner-city kids from New York. She danced proficiently, akin to any other backup dancer, without any exceptional flair.

Again, I just never understood what the deal was. Affleck has had way better and why he chose to get back with her after she rode Sean Combs' prostate massager is beyond me. Who knows what's spreading. Granted, rumor was that out of all the men she had ever been with, she had a particular affinity towards him (i.e. the one that got away, kind of like Madonna with Sean Penn).

"1"

[Grape Ape]

That was probably one of my gayest posts.  I was just trying to explain to an openly gay man why an attractive Latina who's a triple threat might be popular.  As a follow up, I will explain the popularity of Shakira to Bay, Goodrum and Prime.

Literally laughed out loud.

 

[Palumboism]

I recall her stint as a dancer on In Living Color. She struck me as reminiscent of many inner-city Puerto Rican girls from New York during the 70s to the 90s. If you frequented NYC during that era, you'd find girls like her everywhere, especially in certain neighborhoods like the Bronx, El Barrio, Lower East Side, and parts of Brooklyn. Consequently, her facial features didn't strike me as particularly unique. Beyond her face, I found her body proportions lacking (awkward legs, angular elbows, a posterior better suited for a middle-aged mother). It perplexed me why she garnered so much acclaim for her physical appearance. Shifting away from her looks, her vocal abilities were subpar, often replaced by voiceovers from other singers. So what remained? Her dancing. Undoubtedly, she had skill in that department, but so did countless other inner-city kids from New York. She danced proficiently, akin to any other backup dancer, without any exceptional flair.


"1"

You just used logic to prove Madonna and J-Lo shouldn't be stars, but here we are.

[oldtimer1]

I recall her stint as a dancer on In Living Color. She struck me as reminiscent of many inner-city Puerto Rican girls from New York during the 70s to the 90s. If you frequented NYC during that era, you'd find girls like her everywhere, especially in certain neighborhoods like the Bronx, El Barrio, Lower East Side, and parts of Brooklyn. Consequently, her facial features didn't strike me as particularly unique. Beyond her face, I found her body proportions lacking (awkward legs, angular elbows, a posterior better suited for a middle-aged mother). It perplexed me why she garnered so much acclaim for her physical appearance. Shifting away from her looks, her vocal abilities were subpar, often replaced by voiceovers from other singers. So what remained? Her dancing. Undoubtedly, she had skill in that department, but so did countless other inner-city kids from New York. She danced proficiently, akin to any other backup dancer, without any exceptional flair.

Again, I just never understood what the deal was. Affleck has had way better and why he chose to get back with her after she rode Sean Combs' prostate massager is beyond me. Who knows what's spreading. Granted, rumor was that out of all the men she had ever been with, she had a particular affinity towards him (i.e. the one that got away, kind of like Madonna with Sean Penn).

"1"

She was incredibly attractive when she was younger. She's not a kid anymore at 54 and with kids. Maybe since I'm half Puerto Rican I'm biased.

[Humble Narcissist]

Wait what? She wasn't human before famous?

They did gene-splicing to turn her into a human?

Yep, she was a pitbull which is why she gets along with Pitbull.

[Kwon]

Yep, she was a pitbull which is why she gets along with Pitbull.

That explains it!

[G_Thang]

She was incredibly attractive when she was younger. She's not a kid anymore at 54 and with kids. Maybe since I'm half Puerto Rican I'm biased.

If she was so attractive, why didn't the white boys co-sign her? The white boys were about to put Kim K in jail for running up $175k on a woman's credit card, but the negros turned her into a billionaire. What's wrong with this picture? What am I missing? If these women are all that, why do white men avoid them when they come up? It's not until they show some level of wealth at the expense of the dumb negro that white men step in for profit. I was just saying!

You have been warned!

[Kwon]

I prefer garner.

She looks like she has good physique genetics as well so the kids could become iron warriors.

Lopez seems a bit of a bitch as well.

You are correct in many ways, Garner has a warrior physique so the kids would have great genetics, and J-Lo is kind of a bitch


But i think i would get much harder from J Los ass than Garners

[Hulkotron]

I recall her stint as a dancer on In Living Color. She struck me as reminiscent of many inner-city Puerto Rican girls from New York during the 70s to the 90s. If you frequented NYC during that era, you'd find girls like her everywhere, especially in certain neighborhoods like the Bronx, El Barrio, Lower East Side, and parts of Brooklyn. Consequently, her facial features didn't strike me as particularly unique. Beyond her face, I found her body proportions lacking (awkward legs, angular elbows, a posterior better suited for a middle-aged mother). It perplexed me why she garnered so much acclaim for her physical appearance. Shifting away from her looks, her vocal abilities were subpar, often replaced by voiceovers from other singers. So what remained? Her dancing. Undoubtedly, she had skill in that department, but so did countless other inner-city kids from New York. She danced proficiently, akin to any other backup dancer, without any exceptional flair.

Again, I just never understood what the deal was. Affleck has had way better and why he chose to get back with her after she rode Sean Combs' prostate massager is beyond me. Who knows what's spreading. Granted, rumor was that out of all the men she had ever been with, she had a particular affinity towards him (i.e. the one that got away, kind of like Madonna with Sean Penn).

"1"

J-Lo is the first celeb case of "she has a big ass and we are going to push that narrative as attractive" that I remember.  Seems to be the source/origin of her fame.

I respectfully disagree with getbiggers saying she was incredibly attractive when young.  She looked better in her 30s / "Latin Pop" stardom days.  If this is "incredibly attractive" then call me a homo I guess:

[Kwon]

She was NOT incredibly attractive in the 90s lol

[OneMoreRep]

J-Lo is the first celeb case of "she has a big ass and we are going to push that narrative as attractive" that I remember.  Seems to be the source/origin of her fame.

I respectfully disagree with getbiggers saying she was incredibly attractive when young.  She looked better in her 30s / "Latin Pop" stardom days.  If this is "incredibly attractive" then call me a homo I guess:

That's exactly what I mean. Those pictures highlight very clearly what J-Lo looked like in her youth. She's had ample work over the years (nose job etc.), so it's no surprise that she's morphed throughout the years, but she's never been hot in my opinion. She frankly reminds me of so many inner-city Puerto Rican girls that you would see all around New York throughout the 80's-90's.

Was she ugly? No. She was certainly better looking than Harriet Tubman.



"1"

[oldtimer1]

She was NOT incredibly attractive in the 90s lol

Millions of guys disagree with you.

[joswift]

Millions of guys disagree with you.

there are millions of guys would fuck this monstrosity.

[Kwon]

Millions of guys disagree with you.

Maybe but i find her too be MUCH more attractive later on (after the 90s)

[The Scott]

Afflect wasn't thinking like a Man.  These women are beautiful, not slutty like that Lopez creature.  Class over a big ass any day.  But then, I was born olde.


Raquel was stunning.  Twice.

[Hulkotron]

there are millions of guys would fuck this monstrosity.

Shiv does it for me, would pound her out for sure.

[Rambone]

Would love to dance with Jennifer Garner with my patented Michael Stipe moves

[dj181]

I prefer garner.

She looks like she has good physique genetics as well so the kids could become iron warriors.

Lopez seems a bit of a bitch as well.

is she the daughter of james garner?

dude was HANDSOME AS FUCK

[joswift]

Shiv does it for me, would pound her out for sure.

She looks like Stewie from Family Guy

[Humble Narcissist]

She looks like Stewie from Family Guy

She does!