Author Topic: PCT is it necessary?  (Read 1117 times)

OlympiaGym

  • Getbig IV
  • ****
  • Posts: 2121
  • they/them/their
PCT is it necessary?
« on: February 13, 2025, 06:55:22 AM »
Is PCT really necessary after prolonged AAS use? Or can you just go cold turkey? Yes, the withdrawal will be painful going cold turkey, perhaps incredibly painful. but from what I’m reading you’ll eventually end up in the same place as if you did PCT; that is, your natty T levels will eventually recover to whatever they would have been w/out AAS. Seems like the most PCT will do for you is make coming off less of a shock to your system.

joswift

  • Competitors
  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 34864
Re: PCT is it necessary?
« Reply #1 on: February 13, 2025, 06:58:55 AM »
If you want to come off completely reduce the dosage over a long period of time to allow yoiur body to recover

There is an argument that PCT just makes the body take longer to recover due to the high boost of hormones

The body is always trying to normalise

Always wise to have something on hand in case you start getting gyno , its far more common once you come off rather than on

wes

  • Competitors
  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 71190
  • What Dire Mishap Has Befallen Thee
Re: PCT is it necessary?
« Reply #2 on: February 13, 2025, 07:30:58 AM »
Never ever did it at all........no bad effects.

OlympiaGym

  • Getbig IV
  • ****
  • Posts: 2121
  • they/them/their
Re: PCT is it necessary?
« Reply #3 on: February 13, 2025, 08:20:07 AM »
Coming off completely. On 5th week and it’s not been fun but am committed to riding it out. Thought I could be on for life but am worn out with it all. Seems like I’m not the only one based on what I’m reading online.

Previously tapered down to legit TRT doses (not “bodybuilding TRT”) but still enough to be shut down.

Fortunately, never been gyno prone.

BigRo

  • Competitors
  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 7976
  • "Big Rokrainian"
Re: PCT is it necessary?
« Reply #4 on: February 13, 2025, 08:41:11 AM »
Coming off completely. On 5th week and it’s not been fun but am committed to riding it out. Thought I could be on for life but am worn out with it all. Seems like I’m not the only one based on what I’m reading online.

Previously tapered down to legit TRT doses (not “bodybuilding TRT”) but still enough to be shut down.

Fortunately, never been gyno prone.

In what way we're you worn out?

Van_Bilderass

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 16636
  • "Don't Try"
Re: PCT is it necessary?
« Reply #5 on: February 13, 2025, 09:30:06 AM »
AFAIAC PCT is a theoretical model and it's not anywhere close to proven it works; in fact I think I briefly saw some paper arguing it doesn't. I'm sure you can easily find it, it was a couple of years ago. Now, I'm not an expert, these are just my thoughts from thinking it over, if what I say is stupid let me know  :D
If I were to go off permanently ot semi-permanently, I would go on a heavy (or not) HCG regimen well before coming off. Say a couple of months even. The idea is to get the testes online if possible from the fake signal if they have been offline for long. IF you are lucky and your LH bounces back the testes are ready to. I might even do extensive HCG monotherapy having come off to not sit at zero test making the transition smoother theoretically. Sure it's a fake signal but it's your test, you are off steroids. Regarding the SERMs after HCG, why not try them and see if they work and then use as little as possible if no sides. JMO  8)

OlympiaGym

  • Getbig IV
  • ****
  • Posts: 2121
  • they/them/their
Re: PCT is it necessary?
« Reply #6 on: February 13, 2025, 10:30:59 AM »
In what way we're you worn out?

30 years of pinning. Mostly B&C. Just don’t have it in me anymore. Also, health markers no longer good even during  cruise periods. Blood work and BP always used to be manageable during slow periods but no longer. Starting to feel mortal.

OlympiaGym

  • Getbig IV
  • ****
  • Posts: 2121
  • they/them/their
Re: PCT is it necessary?
« Reply #7 on: February 13, 2025, 10:40:37 AM »
AFAIAC PCT is a theoretical model and it's not anywhere close to proven it works; in fact I think I briefly saw some paper arguing it doesn't. I'm sure you can easily find it, it was a couple of years ago. Now, I'm not an expert, these are just my thoughts from thinking it over, if what I say is stupid let me know  :D
If I were to go off permanently ot semi-permanently, I would go on a heavy (or not) HCG regimen well before coming off. Say a couple of months even. The idea is to get the testes online if possible from the fake signal if they have been offline for long. IF you are lucky and your LH bounces back the testes are ready to. I might even do extensive HCG monotherapy having come off to not sit at zero test making the transition smoother theoretically. Sure it's a fake signal but it's your test, you are off steroids. Regarding the SERMs after HCG, why not try them and see if they work and then use as little as possible if no sides. JMO  8)

https://peterbond.org/post/haarlem-study-suggests-post-cycle-therapy-pct-doesnt-work


Notomorrow

  • Getbig IV
  • ****
  • Posts: 1467
Re: PCT is it necessary?
« Reply #8 on: February 13, 2025, 12:04:02 PM »
     I don't want to Google search battle, so this is just my gossip and opinion.   

     It's important to identify "necessary"? Necessary for what? For recovery of natural testosterone it is completely unnecessary, and in the case of HCG, which mimics LH, is not desirable as you are trying to raise your LH to stimulate the testes to wake up and produce test. However, HCG can possibly raise testosterone faster than cold turkey, but in the end will slow complete recovery. Clomid is pretty much harmless, but if you are doing a cycle so high that your estrogen is super high, you should be earning a living from your physique, as no recreational bodybuilder should do cycles so large as to dramatically raise estrogen. Sorry I don't have a right to say what a grown man "should" do but heavy use without the genetics to justify dosage has historically been frowned upon. There should be genetics to justify dosage.

     You should also know your conversion rate(T/E) as in your 20s you have a 40, 50 or higher  but a 50 year old guy might have a T/E ratio of 10. So you convert at a different rate over the course of your life. There are so many factors but PCT as it's called does not make testosterone any higher than cold turkey. It may take longer, but cold turkey is much better for your natural test than PCT. When your body senses drastically low testosterone after a cycle, it begins ramp up LH and FSH, and your testosterone actually could end up higher than at baseline.

     Any of you old enough to remember the old boards, and the Bill Robert's 2 on/4 off "experiment with "Jim"?. it was a dbol only cycle with a shot of test prop on day 1. You train and eat your ass off for 2 weeks on dbol then go off. Roberts said the body has essentially 2 levels of test shutdown, and only after 2 weeks does a deeper HPTA inhibition but actually androgen receptors sensitize. And you will actually super compensate and end up with higher natural test likely from the increased LH and FSH from the temporary low test after 2 weeks, and your balls haven't shrunk so the LH gives them and extra kick.
 
     They did the cycle with this guy Jim, and he put on more muscle than he ever could have done naturally and had higher test. No possible health issues in 2 weeks. That was around 2000 on the old boards before the steroid guys took over bodybuilding. 

     There are so many variables, but my opinion(it's only that) is that permanent shutdown is a myth so guys can continue to take gear with a clear conscience. The only way permanent shutdown would be possible is if LH and FSH were permanently lowered OR there was permanent damage to the actual Leydig cells, in which case HCG would not work. I think the test of whether you have permanent shutdown would be try HCG. It would eliminate Leydig cell damage.

     Old men with super low testosterone have SUPER high LH and FSH, but their balls don't work anymore. If you're 35 your balls are fine, or they will be. Permanent shutdown from gear simply is not backed by science. 20 years of steroids has seriously damaged your endocrine system. You declare 3 years is YOUR timeline to recovery. 10 years seems hellish but if you get your test back in half the time you used that seems reasonable. But god that's hard.

     Any guys been in prison for more than 5 years after being on and find you super compensated after a couple years and got jacked? Craig Titus at his parole hearing last year looks jacked and his skin firmness and tone at 60 years old suggests someone with high testosterone. I know many will say he sneaks in gear but this close to release he wouldn't risk it as close as he's watched for drugs. He's super compensated from the crash when he entered. Just took time.

     I was on nonstop for years, living in Mexico I'd pick up Sostenon preload and shoot 2 or three. SO 750mg or more for many years, no break, never went off. I ended up with heart failure, 10 percent ejection fraction(Thank god I was on vacation here and never went back) But I could never do steroids again. 4 years later I'm 100% recovered, elite level fitness for my age. Guys gear causes heart failure. It killed Big Lenny. 90% of people with 10 percent EF are dead within a couple years. The ONLY thing that changed is I eliminated gear.

    Good news is, after about 3 years, my bloodwork showed 680 test along with a perfect CMP. So it took 3 years after being on HIGH doses of sostenon( I'm not including the 50mg daily dbol tabs) for about 6 years, no break, in 3 years of cold turkey I not only recovered but have super compensated which makes complete scientific sense. I had high LH and FSH because I was so shut down. Now it's 5 years later, 51 years old now, high test, happy with physique.

     So again it's about your goals. If it's only recovery of natural test, why would you do PCT?

Notomorrow theorum

If you have not recovered and/or super compensated in half the time you were on, there is Notomorrow for your natural testosterone, you need to be on TRT. You may not claim permanent shutdown until that point. :P :P :P :P :P














     

Van_Bilderass

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 16636
  • "Don't Try"
Re: PCT is it necessary?
« Reply #9 on: February 13, 2025, 03:20:04 PM »
^
Good points Notomorrow. I do think some permanently downregulate natural test with steroid use. We know from large scale contraceptive studies with 200mg test that it took 2 years for some to recover so it may take a while.
Kid from my gym was on Rx TRT for at least a year, docs took him off to deal with acne with accutane and upon tests like 10 months off his natural test was higher than it had been before TRT, so that's an example of what you're talking about. However his physique and strength was dramatically worse than on the very modest legit TRT (Nebido every 8 weeks or so). It was pretty crazy what TRT did for him, and actually it didn't look like he was low T before HRT but his numbers were terrible.

Read all about the 2 week cycles as a kid. Don't know who was the originator but a pretty well known, now, Norwegian weight training expert by the name of Borge Fagerli ("Blade" on forums) had his experiments and theories on them. Problem IME was that nothing much real muscle seems to be built in those 2 weeks, althought of course some. I used to think you had to get 400 tabs deep of dbol until it really started working and you had got appreciable strengths gains to take advantage of. I think dudes did 15 days on, 20 days off and so on. It's elegant on paper and might be good if kept up for an extended period. Now you could do other non-steroid PEDs during the steroid free periods to keep it going.

There's all sorts of theoreticals on how you could use HCG and or SARMs as TRT, how you could maybe use some HCG without dropping your natural LH and so on. Even 5mg a day of tamoxifen can raise test and could be pretty innocuous. The enclomifene is somewhat popular today but guys say it just doesn't feel like synthetic test does even if numbers are equal. The SARMs of course are weak estrogens themselves and may have negative psychoaffective effects. Plus increased oxidative stress for example in the eyes potentially causing vision problems.

Humble Narcissist

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 32060
Re: PCT is it necessary?
« Reply #10 on: February 14, 2025, 12:34:00 AM »
30 years of pinning. Mostly B&C. Just don’t have it in me anymore. Also, health markers no longer good even during  cruise periods. Blood work and BP always used to be manageable during slow periods but no longer. Starting to feel mortal.
Aging wrecks us all.

OlympiaGym

  • Getbig IV
  • ****
  • Posts: 2121
  • they/them/their
Re: PCT is it necessary?
« Reply #11 on: February 16, 2025, 09:28:31 AM »
Aging wrecks us all.

I don’t want to wind up like John Meadows.

Going on 6 weeks cold turkey. Getting BW next month. I don’t think it’ll be pretty.

Irongrip400

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 22300
  • Pan Germanism, Pax Britannica
Re: PCT is it necessary?
« Reply #12 on: February 16, 2025, 09:33:05 AM »
I don’t want to wind up like John Meadows.

Going on 6 weeks cold turkey. Getting BW next month. I don’t think it’ll be pretty.


Who’s John Meadows?


Anyone ever use HGH during PCT to stop losses? Is that a thing?

Humble Narcissist

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 32060
Re: PCT is it necessary?
« Reply #13 on: February 16, 2025, 10:07:26 AM »
I don’t want to wind up like John Meadows.

Going on 6 weeks cold turkey. Getting BW next month. I don’t think it’ll be pretty.
What is your energy level and sex drive (no homo) like?

OlympiaGym

  • Getbig IV
  • ****
  • Posts: 2121
  • they/them/their
Re: PCT is it necessary?
« Reply #14 on: February 16, 2025, 01:52:00 PM »

Who’s John Meadows?


Anyone ever use HGH during PCT to stop losses? Is that a thing?

Never been a GH guy. Too much water retention and BP issues.

OlympiaGym

  • Getbig IV
  • ****
  • Posts: 2121
  • they/them/their
Re: PCT is it necessary?
« Reply #15 on: February 16, 2025, 01:53:09 PM »
What is your energy level and sex drive (no homo) like?

Very low.

BigRo

  • Competitors
  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 7976
  • "Big Rokrainian"
Re: PCT is it necessary?
« Reply #16 on: February 16, 2025, 01:54:46 PM »

Who’s John Meadows?


Anyone ever use HGH during PCT to stop losses? Is that a thing?

Yes but then its like a bridge, it is still using an exogenous signal to raise LH, the body has to have nothing coming in to start firing on its own.

joswift

  • Competitors
  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 34864
Re: PCT is it necessary?
« Reply #17 on: February 16, 2025, 02:00:34 PM »
Yes but then its like a bridge, it is still using an exogenous signal to raise LH, the body has to have nothing coming in to start firing on its own.

this...

PCT was invented by steroid dealers to sell you stuff while you were off

illuminati

  • Competitors II
  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 24563
  • The Strongest Shall Survive.- - Lest we Forget.
Re: PCT is it necessary?
« Reply #18 on: February 16, 2025, 02:10:18 PM »
this...

PCT was invented by steroid dealers to sell you stuff while you were off

Correct 👊🏻

Irongrip400

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 22300
  • Pan Germanism, Pax Britannica
Re: PCT is it necessary?
« Reply #19 on: February 16, 2025, 02:33:09 PM »
this...

PCT was invented by steroid dealers to sell you stuff while you were off


Really? The logic seems like it checks out, that by putting too much test in your body shuts it down, that by pumping a lot of estrogen and n your body would cause test to jump in order to counteract that ratio.

joswift

  • Competitors
  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 34864
Re: PCT is it necessary?
« Reply #20 on: February 16, 2025, 02:35:15 PM »

Really? The logic seems like it checks out, that by putting too much test in your body shuts it down, that by pumping a lot of estrogen and n your body would cause test to jump in order to counteract that ratio.
chuck a lot of estrogen into your body and the only thing that would jump out are your tits.

Notomorrow

  • Getbig IV
  • ****
  • Posts: 1467
Re: PCT is it necessary?
« Reply #21 on: February 18, 2025, 12:10:28 AM »

Really? The logic seems like it checks out, that by putting too much test in your body shuts it down, that by pumping a lot of estrogen and n your body would cause test to jump in order to counteract that ratio.
both estrogen and testosterone are regulated by the HPTA. So if the body senses high estrogen OR high testosterone it shuts down LH AND FSH. THis is the theory behind taking AE’s in PCT.  Part of HPTA shutdown was from high estrogen so if you block estrogen maybe the HPTA would recover faster, but it was the test that shut you down, not the estrogen.

     Just wait it out. But no…lol…the feedback system would not begin producing testosterone with exogenous estrogen introduced. Excess estrogen shuts the HPTA down like testosterone. Any exogenous hormone you introduce will lower natural production.
     What will raise testosterone the most is having VERY low testosterone for a period of time. Your LH and FSH will panic and as long as your balls are healthy low test=high test if you’re willing to wait it out.

     Like old school, the goal is brief, heavy cycles, quick recovery of natural test and insane diet and training NATTY so that your natural test is enough to maintain 80% of each brief cycle. Over years this equals a bodybuilder.  3-4 lbs a year in the right places.