Do You Have Any Questions About What Happened in 2001?

[chaos]

Your post about scrap being sent off to be recycled is true and suspicious, but again, thousands of truck drivers and heavy equipment operators moving that material, none of them saw anything weird in the rubble?

[hench]

Anyone seen this?
https://www.instagram.com/reel/DZkMcoXgdGR/?igsh=MWoxYXgxOThybjM2cg==

[Irongrip400]

Your post about scrap being sent off to be recycled is true and suspicious, but again, thousands of truck drivers and heavy equipment operators moving that material, none of them saw anything weird in the rubble?

That’s exactly what you do with scrap, send it to the recycler and get paid. Also, there’s no way this many people could keep a secret. It’s just not possible. Like I said, the only one that is a little fishy is the building 7 that didn’t get hit but still collapsed. But, it had two massive buildings next to it collapse so it may have weakened the foundation.

I’m not saying it’s not possible it was an inside job, I’m just saying the accepted explanation is sound enough to believe.

[hench]

Did any other buildings collapse in the vicinity and if so did they collapse in the same way. If not even that is a bit fishy that only wtc buildings went down, especially one that wasn't even hit by a plane..

[obsidian]

Dancing Israelis in NY on 911...

They were happy when the towers collapsed.

Anyone noticed the new WTC tower resembles the Jewish Star?

[obsidian]

911 was an inside job, no doubt. The US is the Empire of Lies.

The official story is a plane hit the Pentagon. But the pathetic low frame security footage does not indicate a plane. A missile was shot at the Pentagon from a low elevation. A decoy plane flew over the Pentagon to try and sell the idea of a plane in the area that supposedly hit it. All the small debris that agents carried in photos was marketing to sell the idea. Those pieces were probably trucked in to make it look legit. The lawn looked pristine, except for the few prop pieces that they placed and carried around. So fake.

And for everyone who claims it's impossible for so many people to be in on it go fuck yourself. It was compartmentalized and the taxi driver did claim in an interview the whole thing was bigger than one person. So there is one crucial witness that already casts doubt on it all.

I would believe nothing coming from the US Deep State. It's all smoke and mirrors and BS.

Where's the plane in the video below? See the other two images — you can't hide a plane — even in 5 frames.

[hench]

911 was an inside job, no doubt. The US is the Empire of Lies.

The official story is a plane hit the Pentagon. But the pathetic low frame security footage does not indicate a plane. A missile was shot at the Pentagon from a low elevation. A decoy plane flew over the Pentagon to try and sell the idea of a plane in the area that supposedly hit it. All the small debris that agents carried in photos was marketing to sell the idea. Those pieces were probably trucked in to make it look legit. The lawn looked pristine, except for the few prop pieces that they placed and carried around. So fake.

And for everyone who claims it's impossible for so many people to be in on it go fuck yourself. It was compartmentalized and the taxi driver did claim in an interview the whole thing was bigger than one person. So there is one crucial witness that already casts doubt on it all.

I would believe nothing coming from the US Deep State. It's all smoke and mirrors and BS.

Where's the plane in the video below? See the other two images — you can't hide a plane — even in 5 frames.

Bottom 2 clearly a plane,  top one missile, what gives?

[obsidian]

Bottom 2 clearly a plane,  top one missile, what gives?

The bottom two are fake. Someone edited a plane into the footage to suggest what it would have looked like. A commercial airliner is not exactly small. But the official video is the top one and it looks like a missile. I am also curious why all the security footage at the numerous gas stations and businesses was never released. All we got was a crappy video with a few frames...

[hench]

The bottom two are fake. Someone edited a plane into the footage to suggest what it would have looked like. A commercial airliner is not exactly small. But the official video is the top one and it looks like a missile. I am also curious why all the security footage at the numerous gas stations and businesses was never released. All we got was a crappy video with a few frames...

Good point,  why would  the plane be at ground level as if taking off or landing.
Everything does look dodgy but they'd have to rely so much on there not being witnesses, which they're are plenty!
I don't buy the planes were holograms or they were edited into the footage after. People saw them hit, holograms aren't leaving impact zones or edited in after cgi planes.
And what about all the people who died on the flights.  If they didn't die on planes where did they disappear to?

[chaos]

Surely there is some mix of truth and conspiracy theory to the whole story. Where do they all intertwine? I feel like this is done intentionally to sow confusion into the story. Massive misinformation mixed in with the facts and all sorts of secret backroom dealings makes it a confusing story to follow. Nobody will ever know 100% truth.

[hench]

Surely there is some mix of truth and conspiracy theory to the whole story. Where do they all intertwine? I feel like this is done intentionally to sow confusion into the story. Massive misinformation mixed in with the facts and all sorts of secret backroom dealings makes it a confusing story to follow. Nobody will ever know 100% truth.

It also begs the question  if it was an inside job, who had the nuts to suggest it in the first place and to who?

[obsidian]

Good point,  why would  the plane be at ground level as if taking off or landing.
Everything does look dodgy but they'd have to rely so much on there not being witnesses, which they're are plenty!
I don't buy the planes were holograms or they were edited into the footage after. People saw them hit, holograms aren't leaving impact zones or edited in after cgi planes.
And what about all the people who died on the flights.  If they didn't die on planes where did they disappear to?

In the Pentagon's case a decoy plane flew over the building moments before the missile hit it. Some guys did a documentary where they interviewed cops and witnesses who saw a plane fly overhead. The flight path they established was off from the official version. The taxi driver was also interviewed and they cornered him because of the inconsistencies. The plane supposedly hit numerous light poles and one fell on his taxi. But this was all staged. He kind of alluded to that in the car while they were driving. I think the taxi driver's wife worked for the FBI.

I can't comment on all the people that supposedly died in the plane crashes. I did not know them personally so I have to believe whatever is said. It's easy to lie to billions of people when a few hundred people are missing. How would these billions of people be able to verify they existed? What if the relatives are crisis actors? I mean I literally know none of these people so I have to trust that I am not being lied to?

All I know is that's not a plane hitting the Pentagon. That's a pretty big lie. No plane, but they say it was a plane. So they are lying about the plane (because my eyes can't lie to me — no plane in footage), the passengers, the cause of the explosion, etc. At this point the question should be, what are they not lying about?!

[hench]

In the Pentagon's case a decoy plane flew over the building moments before the missile hit it. Some guys did a documentary where they interviewed cops and witnesses who saw a plane fly overhead. The flight path they established was off from the official version. The taxi driver was also interviewed and they cornered him because of the inconsistencies. The plane supposedly hit numerous light poles and one fell on his taxi. But this was all staged. He kind of alluded to that in the car while they were driving. I think the taxi driver's wife worked for the FBI.

I can't comment on all the people that supposedly died in the plane crashes. I did not know them personally so I have to believe whatever is said. It's easy to lie to billions of people when a few hundred people are missing. How would these billions of people be able to verify they existed? What if the relatives are crisis actors? I mean I literally know none of these people so I have to trust that I am not being lied to?

All I know is that's not a plane hitting the Pentagon. That's a pretty big lie. No plane, but they say it was a plane. So they are lying about the plane (because my eyes can't lie to me — no plane in footage), the passengers, the cause of the explosion, etc. At this point the question should be, what are they not lying about?!

Thing is there are stories of people who were due on those planes and luckily missed them for whatever reason. Mark Wahlberg was even due on one.  Can't forget how he said the plane wouldn't have crashed if he'd been on it 
 

[illuminati]

In the Pentagon's case a decoy plane flew over the building moments before the missile hit it. Some guys did a documentary where they interviewed cops and witnesses who saw a plane fly overhead. The flight path they established was off from the official version. The taxi driver was also interviewed and they cornered him because of the inconsistencies. The plane supposedly hit numerous light poles and one fell on his taxi. But this was all staged. He kind of alluded to that in the car while they were driving. I think the taxi driver's wife worked for the FBI.

I can't comment on all the people that supposedly died in the plane crashes. I did not know them personally so I have to believe whatever is said. It's easy to lie to billions of people when a few hundred people are missing. How would these billions of people be able to verify they existed? What if the relatives are crisis actors? I mean I literally know none of these people so I have to trust that I am not being lied to?

All I know is that's not a plane hitting the Pentagon. That's a pretty big lie. No plane, but they say it was a plane. So they are lying about the plane (because my eyes can't lie to me — no plane in footage), the passengers, the cause of the explosion, etc. At this point the question should be, what are they not lying about?!

100%  No plane hit the Pentagon - Impossible for a inexperienced & likely a very experienced pilot
To fly that plane that low & not hit anything 1st.

Also where did the engines & landing gear go , as they're the most solid parts on the plane.
Definitely lies about the pentagon, and most likely, ies about the twin towers / building No7.

[chaos]

100%  No plane hit the Pentagon - Impossible for a inexperienced & likely a very experienced pilot
To fly that plane that low & not hit anything 1st.

Also where did the engines & landing gear go , as they're the most solid parts on the plane.
Definitely lies about the pentagon, and most likely, ies about the twin towers / building No7.

So let's say no plane hit the Pentagon, there are pictures of airplane debris in the grass and building. Who put it there? Seems it would have taken people to plant that material, no witnesses have come forward? Nobody involved in planting the parts has come forward?