Move to get the IFBB rules followed!

[dearth]

How do you figure? I just said, EITHER offense would result in suspention...where's the "selective application"?

Chick, I'm going to go out on a limb here but Manion and company just may not drug test the olympia as it
may render our sports greatest athlete, MR. Olympia, a drug using cheater (i.e. from having broken the rules).

hence the blatant selective application.

[Chick]

They haven't drug tested any other show this year, either...

You're not making any sense..

[tom joad]

Chick, I'm going to go out on a limb here but Manion and company just may not drug test the olympia as it
may render our sports greatest athlete, MR. Olympia, a drug using cheater (i.e. from having broken the rules).

hence the blatant selective application.

That's just pure speculation on your part.  There is no evidence that Ronnie Coleman (or any other athlete on the Olympia stage) uses performance enhancing drugs.

[gibberj2]

have you lost your mind completely?

[cornebb]

That's just pure speculation on your part.  There is no evidence that Ronnie Coleman (or any other athlete on the Olympia stage) uses performance enhancing drugs.

HAHAHAHAHAHHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA

[240 is Back]

That's just pure speculation on your part.  There is no evidence that Ronnie Coleman (or any other athlete on the Olympia stage) uses performance enhancing drugs.

I just laughed so hard I broke a rib

[HRDCOR]

That's just pure speculation on your part.  There is no evidence that Ronnie Coleman (or any other athlete on the Olympia stage) uses performance enhancing drugs.
                                   

I would suggest pure lean mass quantity would be a dead give away !!

[Wombat]

That's just pure speculation on your part.  There is no evidence that Ronnie Coleman (or any other athlete on the Olympia stage) uses performance enhancing drugs.

3 to 5  gyno surguries in one decade may be a dead give away don't ya think

[onlyme]

That's just pure speculation on your part.  There is no evidence that Ronnie Coleman (or any other athlete on the Olympia stage) uses performance enhancing drugs.

Man I just squirted milk out of my nose.  That is one of the funniest posts ever on Getbig.

[onlyme]

They haven't drug tested any other show this year, either...

You're not making any sense..

And this statement makes total sense.  It's exact proof that the IFBB is full of shit.  Explain why there is a rule book for the IFBB.  Come up with say 3 good answers why the IFBB has a rule book.

[Original Sin]

And this statement makes total sense.  It's exact proof that the IFBB is full of shit.  Explain why there is a rule book for the IFBB.  Come up with say 3 good answers why the IFBB has a rule book.

1. It makes a great coaster
2. Ben's desk has one leg shorter then the rest
3. Throwing the chinese take out menu at Lee doesn't have the same impact.

[Chick]

And this statement makes total sense.  It's exact proof that the IFBB is full of shit.  Explain why there is a rule book for the IFBB.  Come up with say 3 good answers why the IFBB has a rule book.

It makes perfect sense to the question asked...

[mrsirjojo]

And this statement makes total sense.  It's exact proof that the IFBB is full of shit.  Explain why there is a rule book for the IFBB.  Come up with say 3 good answers why the IFBB has a rule book.

1) The Weiders originally planned to add 300 pages of ads to it and sell it for $7.99 on newstands.

2) Some of the shorter bodybuilders stand on it to kiss Ben Weider's ass.

3) It's laced with Anadrol-50 so pros can grow just by thumbing through it.

[nycbull]

1) The Weiders originally planned to add 300 pages of ads to it and sell it for $7.99 on newstands.

2) Some of the shorter bodybuilders stand on it to kiss Ben Weider's ass.

3) It's laced with Anadrol-50 so pros can grow just by thumbing through it.

funny, very good stuff.

[DonDan]

Too challenged for your integrity???  What's that suppose to mean??   If you had some integrity, you would not have made the assessment of the cause of death for the Mentzer's.  Shows complete dishonor for the dead and its based on an  unsubstantiated assumption.  You are well old enough to know better than to openly make a comment like that.

LOL! "unsubstantiated assumption"? WTF? You're just like that Wayans guy who used to do that comedy skit of a con in jail trying to use big words. Assumptions are just that. They don't require substantiation. You are such a doofus.

[dearth]

They haven't drug tested any other show this year, either...

You're not making any sense..

I guess its hard to make sense of anything when the truth hurts.

Chick your logic is very weak. I'm not sure why Ron Avidan has mistaken you for a "good debater"

Not drug testing and therfore not enforcing the drug RULE, while enforcing other RULES as the IFBB sees fit
is nothing short of hypocrisy.

I've asked you before for some sort of hierarchy of importance regarding the rules, that you had mentioned...
however you've offering nothing.

Chick, I'm afraid to tell you (again) but,

THE IFBB SELECTIVELY APPLIES ITS RULES!!!!

[Vince G, CSN MFT]

By that standard, just about anyone could post any pic and say it was them.

Vince competed though, in 2004.  his pics were up on their official website.  he runs a an online supplement business.  And he has posted a series of examples, from locker room shots, to scans of state IDs, to prove his identity.  Vince is a real person.

You can also check with the SC Dept of Consumer Affairs.  I recently got licensed as a legal service representive yesterday to sell pre-paid legal services through my company....


South Carolina sure knows how to rape someone in licenses and etc

[Chick]

I guess its hard to make sense of anything when the truth hurts.

Chick your logic is very weak. I'm not sure why Ron Avidan has mistaken you for a "good debater"

Not drug testing and therfore not enforcing the drug RULE, while enforcing other RULES as the IFBB sees fit
is nothing short of hypocrisy.

I've asked you before for some sort of hierarchy of importance regarding the rules, that you had mentioned...
however you've offering nothing.

Chick, I'm afraid to tell you (again) but,

THE IFBB SELECTIVELY APPLIES ITS RULES!!!!

You have to know how to read and interpret rules before making comment on whether or not they are "selectively enforced"...

It is clearly stated that they "reserve the right" to drug test...athletes are "subject to..." it does not state that they will absolutely drug test every show....for that matter, they can elect NOT to suspend Lee for crossing over, although the likelyhood of that is slim given the precedent that has been set in that reguard...

Anyone who HAS failed a drug test HAS been fined, or suspended or both. Your argument STILL holds no water as they don't HAVE to test, they reserve the right to....

Let me break it down even further for you:

athlete failed drug test....result: fined/ suspended
athlete crossed over.......result: fined/ suspended

get it now?

[Colossus_1986]

ITS ALL SO CLEAR TO ME NOW! lol

[cornebb]

yeah im with chick and lee
 

[dearth]

You have to know how to read and interpret rules before making comment on whether or not they are "selectively enforced"...

It is clearly stated that they "reserve the right" to drug test...athletes are "subject to..." it does not state that they will absolutely drug test every show....for that matter, they can elect NOT to suspend Lee for crossing over, although the likelyhood of that is slim given the precedent that has been set in that reguard...

Anyone who HAS failed a drug test HAS been fined, or suspended or both. Your argument STILL holds no water as they don't HAVE to test, they reserve the right to....

Let me break it down even further for you:

athlete failed drug test....result: fined/ suspended
athlete crossed over.......result: fined/ suspended

get it now?

gee Chick, I wonder why they don't drug test more often..

here is some simple IFBB logic,

no drug testing -> don't have to enforce failed drug test rule
rebellious athlete we don't like crosses over -> enforce the crossing federation rule
Bob Chick makes slanderous comments about IFBB pro women in a public forum -> no need to enforce the ethics rule