Not really. I think they were pretty evenly matched, and in the history of Mr. Olympia judging, when has a Mr. Olympia lost unless he was completely knocked out. No matter how you cut it, that didn't happen.
You Ronnie guy! You're worse than Hulkster!

According to the udges, your boy was flaT ouT destroyed. No contest! "That didn't happen"?! Bullshit! Cutler defeated him 38 to 22 points! I personally think it was close, but the udges saw it as a massacre on Cutler's part.

Generally in the case of a draw, or even in the case of the current Mr. Olympia being 10% worse, he will STILL win. So the outcome is still odd to me.
The thing is that Ronnie was 50% worse. No contest, dude: your boy got it handed to him. Now, I think that Ronnie still defeated Cutler in quadriceps and pectoralis muscularity, and he still had the best midsecTion. But the only thing Coleman had decisively on him were biceps. Last year, Cutler had matched Ronnie for lat width, but still didn't have his thickness. This year it became obvious that he surpassed Ronnie for width and was at least as thick. This combined with his striated hams and superior calves, gave Cutler the whole win from the back.
As far as mandatories go, I'd give Ronnie the front double biceps, abs-and-thighs and side chest - on virtue of his thicker pectoralis. But Cutler won the side triceps, front lat spread, back double biceps and rear lat spread decisively, both from a muscularity and symmery standpoints. I would still give Ronnie the symmetry round overrall, on account of his superior structure and better midsection. All things considered, Cutler was a deserving winner. Admit it, you Ronnie nut-milker!

SUCKMYMUSCLE