Author Topic: Do Coleman,Cutler,and Ruhl= maximum acheivable muscle size limit??  (Read 3606 times)

LASTREP72

  • Getbig III
  • ***
  • Posts: 541
  • STANZO-20 stayin crisp, tight, and strong!!!
Do these guys currently represent what is most attainable with the best genetics when it comes to putting pure muscle mass on a male frame? Are we currently looking at the largest a human will ever get with pure muscle - are there any possible advances that will take mass building to yet another level - we had Arnold\Sergio that took it to a level - then Dorian\Nasser now Ronnie\Jay\Ruhl have just blown it outta proportion - what's next. I truly feel that if a man's back is to wide he'll have problems wiping his own ass!!
I'm Rick James BITCH!!!

smaul

  • Getbig IV
  • ****
  • Posts: 1290
  • Lets build some hurting bombs!
Re: Do Coleman,Cutler,and Ruhl= maximum acheivable muscle size limit??
« Reply #1 on: October 04, 2006, 02:00:56 AM »
Until the next drugs come along
It hasn't helped...

Alexander Sturm

  • Getbig II
  • **
  • Posts: 245
  • Getbig!
Re: Do Coleman,Cutler,and Ruhl= maximum acheivable muscle size limit??
« Reply #2 on: October 04, 2006, 02:01:41 AM »
No. Myostatin is coming...

Alexander Sturm

  • Getbig II
  • **
  • Posts: 245
  • Getbig!
Re: Do Coleman,Cutler,and Ruhl= maximum acheivable muscle size limit??
« Reply #3 on: October 04, 2006, 02:05:14 AM »
................ :o

IFBBwannaB

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 4538
  • BAN stick!
Re: Do Coleman,Cutler,and Ruhl= maximum acheivable muscle size limit??
« Reply #4 on: October 04, 2006, 02:09:57 AM »
................ :o

I have been waiting for this shit for years no! >:(

kyomu

  • Competitors
  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 16407
  • トホカミエミタメ ハラヒタマヒ キヨメタマフ
Re: Do Coleman,Cutler,and Ruhl= maximum acheivable muscle size limit??
« Reply #5 on: October 04, 2006, 02:19:03 AM »
Yes.
well. NO.
Because everytime I thought "Oh this time its a limit." in these 18years.
People make gain and gain and gain..........

phyxsius

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 6264
  • Mini Getbigger
Re: Do Coleman,Cutler,and Ruhl= maximum acheivable muscle size limit??
« Reply #6 on: October 04, 2006, 02:27:06 AM »
I am a mini beast

Figo

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 8101
Re: Do Coleman,Cutler,and Ruhl= maximum acheivable muscle size limit??
« Reply #7 on: October 04, 2006, 02:27:18 AM »
When Darrem Charles comes in at 310lbs, then we're there.

hipolito mejia

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 7255
  • Getbig!
Re: Do Coleman,Cutler,and Ruhl= maximum acheivable muscle size limit??
« Reply #8 on: October 04, 2006, 05:58:06 AM »
In their frames? yes

best genetics ever? no

Just look at the size of their gut (size limit there for a muscular men)??

Now Sergio Oliva was a beast 40 years ago, poor nutrition shitti drugs still 29 inch waist!!! think about it

LASTREP72

  • Getbig III
  • ***
  • Posts: 541
  • STANZO-20 stayin crisp, tight, and strong!!!
Re: Do Coleman,Cutler,and Ruhl= maximum acheivable muscle size limit??
« Reply #9 on: October 04, 2006, 06:33:45 AM »
In their frames? yes

best genetics ever? no

Just look at the size of their gut (size limit there for a muscular men)??

Now Sergio Oliva was a beast 40 years ago, poor nutrition shitti drugs still 29 inch waist!!! think about it
I think the next thing we'll see is someone who comes along that's about Sean Allen's size (height) with the genetics of some one like Coleman or Oliva. BTW I remeber in some interview Oliva was saying that he told Dillet that if he let him train him, he would make sure he won 10 Olympias in a row!! Dam maybe Dillet should've trusted the old skool!!
I'm Rick James BITCH!!!

Mars

  • Time Out
  • Getbig V
  • *
  • Posts: 27707
Re: Do Coleman,Cutler,and Ruhl= maximum acheivable muscle size limit??
« Reply #10 on: October 04, 2006, 06:35:31 AM »
................ :o

prove you don't have to train to put on muscle using juice.

YoungBlood

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 6777
  • Weee!
Re: Do Coleman,Cutler,and Ruhl= maximum acheivable muscle size limit??
« Reply #11 on: October 04, 2006, 07:05:43 AM »
well. NO.
Because everytime I thought "Oh this time its a limit." in these 18years.
People make gain and gain and gain..........


Yes, but that has stalled in recent years.

BBing changes, in it's standards and competitiveness, about every 10 years.
Arnold was around from 69-74, then it was the reign of Zane. After that, Arnold and Franco came back for their wins, which were again followed by smaller, aesthetic physiques. Then, for eight years, (1984) was Lee Haney. Another 6 (92-97)for Dorian and Ronnie (98-2005) for eight more years. When Sergio won, the bar was raised, as well when Arnold beat Sergio the next year. Then Haney came in, seemingly destroyed everybody. Dorian, raised that bar again, and Ronnie took it to yet another level. Then oblieterated his own level in '03.
It seems that the guys will never get bigger, but yet they do. Have we really seen the limit? I'd like to say yes, since we're now seeing a lot more side effects with the more often seen guts, muscle tears, and people retiring from health problems. But who really knows. Maybe in 10 more years, when we're all still around GetBig, we can find out.

kyomu

  • Competitors
  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 16407
  • トホカミエミタメ ハラヒタマヒ キヨメタマフ
Re: Do Coleman,Cutler,and Ruhl= maximum acheivable muscle size limit??
« Reply #12 on: October 04, 2006, 07:29:45 AM »

BBing changes, in it's standards and competitiveness, about every 10 years.
Arnold was around from 69-74, then it was the reign of Zane. After that, Arnold and Franco came back for their wins, which were again followed by smaller, aesthetic physiques. Then, for eight years, (1984) was Lee Haney. Another 6 (92-97)for Dorian and Ronnie (98-2005) for eight more years. When Sergio won, the bar was raised, as well when Arnold beat Sergio the next year. Then Haney came in, seemingly destroyed everybody. Dorian, raised that bar again, and Ronnie took it to yet another level. Then oblieterated his own level in '03.
It seems that the guys will never get bigger, but yet they do. Have we really seen the limit? I'd like to say yes, since we're now seeing a lot more side effects with the more often seen guts, muscle tears, and people retiring from health problems. But who really knows. Maybe in 10 more years, when we're all still around GetBig, we can find out.
You are absolutely right. Those side efects havent been seen that much before. But its increasing surely.

BroadStreetBruiser

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 8574
  • "In Falcon We Trust"
Re: Do Coleman,Cutler,and Ruhl= maximum acheivable muscle size limit??
« Reply #13 on: October 04, 2006, 07:33:09 AM »
that cow has a huge penis
$

Your MAAAAaaaa

  • Time Out
  • Getbig IV
  • *
  • Posts: 1402
  • GETBIGS MINISTER OF SEXUAL HEALTH
Re: Do Coleman,Cutler,and Ruhl= maximum acheivable muscle size limit??
« Reply #14 on: October 04, 2006, 07:40:16 AM »
that cow has a huge penis

Mmmmmmmeaty!



ta ta
Pm me for STI advice @ NO COST

anvil

  • Getbig IV
  • ****
  • Posts: 2068

luv2build

  • Getbig III
  • ***
  • Posts: 339
  • Getbig!
Re: Do Coleman,Cutler,and Ruhl= maximum acheivable muscle size limit??
« Reply #16 on: October 04, 2006, 07:58:32 AM »
Now i have seen this picture many times before, but is this real.  i have read about myostatin and understand how it works.  but if this is a real result of myostatin i cant wait to see what happens when a human tries it.  interesting!

anvil

  • Getbig IV
  • ****
  • Posts: 2068
Re: Do Coleman,Cutler,and Ruhl= maximum acheivable muscle size limit??
« Reply #17 on: October 04, 2006, 08:00:58 AM »
Now i have seen this picture many times before, but is this real.  i have read about myostatin and understand how it works.  but if this is a real result of myostatin i cant wait to see what happens when a human tries it.  interesting!

Maybe Ruhl already does  :D

swilkins1984

  • Getbig IV
  • ****
  • Posts: 3420
Re: Do Coleman,Cutler,and Ruhl= maximum acheivable muscle size limit??
« Reply #18 on: October 04, 2006, 08:07:03 AM »
No, more muscle can be added at the expense on waist and symmetry.

ryanlemley1

  • Getbig II
  • **
  • Posts: 21
Re: Do Coleman,Cutler,and Ruhl= maximum acheivable muscle size limit??
« Reply #19 on: October 04, 2006, 08:39:44 AM »
what's up with Jay's abs?

knny187

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 22005
Re: Do Coleman,Cutler,and Ruhl= maximum acheivable muscle size limit??
« Reply #20 on: October 04, 2006, 10:00:13 AM »
I say no....


just like half of the human population use about 1% of their brains capabilities

 ;)

fathead

  • Getbig IV
  • ****
  • Posts: 2011
  • Getbig!
Re: Do Coleman,Cutler,and Ruhl= maximum acheivable muscle size limit??
« Reply #21 on: October 04, 2006, 10:19:00 AM »
Does Sergio have a granddaughter we can mate with Ronnie?

Bill Loguidice

  • Getbig II
  • **
  • Posts: 60
Re: Do Coleman,Cutler,and Ruhl= maximum acheivable muscle size limit??
« Reply #22 on: October 04, 2006, 10:53:20 AM »
I would like to think that we're at the limits, since to me, "pro" (drug-based) bodybuilding physiques peaked in the early 90's.  Once the bloat and guts started becoming common, I became much less interested in following the scene.  If they can synthesize drugs that help one to put on size without organ growth and keeps you dry and ripped better than in 80's, then certainly that would be a positive for those into that sort of thing, but based on the way these guys look now and have looked for well over a decade, I'm not terrifically optimistic.  It seems there really is a thing as too much size, particularly when we look at how good many of the guys looked early on in their careers before they got really "big".  I know it's a pipe dream, but I'd love to see everyone try to maximize themselves "naturally" (assuming OTC supplements are natural) so this way legitimate research into healthy supplementation would receive a bigger boost.  As large as the supplement industry is today, one wonders where that would be along with bodybuilding as a whole if things didn't spiral out of control and frustrated and turn off large tracts of the public.

Adam Empire

  • Getbig IV
  • ****
  • Posts: 2370
  • Gobias Industries
Re: Do Coleman,Cutler,and Ruhl= maximum acheivable muscle size limit??
« Reply #23 on: October 04, 2006, 11:11:48 AM »
Until the next drugs come along


Quote from Patrick Arnold on SI.com today.

"There is a future beyond steroids and its gene doping," he said. "It's the next step. The only way it can be detected now is through a muscle biopsy, though they may be looking for blood markers. They are making great advances and how they keep that out of the hands of people with healthy muscles who use it for performance-enhancing reasons I don't know."

I would think gene doping could take it to the next level...

Motherboy (the band).