look im not a ronnie basher but theres no fucking way his calver are real. Weve gone over this a thousand times and nobody will ever change their opinion - but no way are his calves real
why do you say that?
they looked the same (small and crappy) whether it was 1994 or 2005:
what indication do you have for synthol use or implants in his calves?
seriously. because the pics over time certainly do not indicate anything fishy.
look the same as they always do.
show me the pics that indicate synthol/impants.
If you have this opinion it hopefully has some basis?
or its it just made up?
for all the people who have claimed fake calves, I have yet to see
even one set of pics showing something weird. I can show
hundreds of pics over the last 12 years showing the
same old crappy development (other than a slight size increase, of course)
So, given this fact, what gives?