Author Topic: Ronnie's left quad sweep is definitely torn... (Read 8783 times)

Rearden Metal · « **Reply #25 on:** October 10, 2006, 07:16:59 PM »

Quote from: jem123 on October 10, 2006, 02:58:04 PM

I gotta say Hulkster there is no difference in those two images. Good call.

It's been torn for years.

It's definitely torn. I should know, I have a torn quad.

Cableguy · « **Reply #26 on:** October 10, 2006, 11:04:33 PM »

As I have already noted, Ronnie's left quad has been torn for several years.
Just check out pix from before 2003 and you'll easily see the difference.

jem123 · « **Reply #27 on:** October 11, 2006, 01:07:53 AM »

While i can see the quad is torn my point is that there are no real differences in it from 2005 to 2006. As he won in 2005 how much of a problem is it? The back IMO is the big problem he has.

pumpster · « **Reply #28 on:** October 11, 2006, 03:46:08 AM »

Quote

Dorian was king of the lat spread, that pic is awesome.

He had to be, it's a great pose for hiding certain deficiencies he was also king of.

Awesome thigh development in that latest shot-whatever's "busted" on Coleman's not particularly noticable if it takes that many posts to try to clarify where the problem is.

LASTREP72 · « **Reply #29 on:** October 11, 2006, 03:51:45 AM »

Quote from: Rearden Metal on October 10, 2006, 07:16:59 PM

It's been torn for years.

It's definitely torn. I should know, I have a torn quad.

Yep it's torn they did an article on him and some others (Vic, Gunther etc) who were sporting torn muscles in Muscle Mag in either late 05 or early 06.

Cableguy · « **Reply #30 on:** October 12, 2006, 11:02:08 PM »

It's interesting how his torn quad doesn't really diminish the size or shape of his leg.
That's why I think not too many people have really noticed it or talked about it much.
Not so for some others like Idrise Ward-El, who's quad tear (and biceps tear for that matter!)
is unfortunately VERY noticeable!

Wiggs · « **Reply #31 on:** October 13, 2010, 04:23:13 PM »

Yates feathered hair sucks...it was cool for its time though.

Cableguy · « **Reply #32 on:** October 13, 2010, 04:30:50 PM »

Definitely torn...

monstercalves · « **Reply #33 on:** October 13, 2010, 04:51:19 PM »

Quote from: jwb on October 10, 2006, 02:26:27 PM

He is in way better shape here though...

lmfao his quad "sweep" is torn ......u dont have a clue what ur talking about

btw the pic was taken b4 he actually hit the pose properly

have u been smoking extacy pipes again.... ffs

jwb · « **Reply #34 on:** October 13, 2010, 05:02:08 PM »

Quote from: monstercalves on October 13, 2010, 04:51:19 PM

lmfao his quad "sweep" is torn ......u dont have a clue what ur talking about

btw the pic was taken b4 he actually hit the pose properly

have u been smoking extacy pipes again.... ffs

4 year old thread posted when there was debate about what was going on with Ronnie's left quad.

Today there is no doubt it is injured beyond repair.

jwb · « **Reply #35 on:** October 13, 2010, 05:06:16 PM »

From memory the "he is in better shape" comment was from how Ronnie sharpened up from the 06 Mr O to the grand prix the week later where the pic was taken.

monstercalves · « **Reply #36 on:** October 13, 2010, 05:07:16 PM »

Quote from: jwb on October 13, 2010, 05:02:08 PM

4 year old thread posted when there was debate about what was going on with Ronnie's left quad.

Today there is no doubt it is injured beyond repair.

yes but no part of the quad is called "sweep" in biological terms therfore it cant be torn ......

his quad may have been torn or nerve damage etc .... but the sweep is not torn lool..... because his quad is torn this may effect his quad "sweep""

tommywishbone · « **Reply #37 on:** October 13, 2010, 05:08:53 PM »

I strongly object to anyone named "monstercalves" posting in a Coleman thread.

chaos · « **Reply #38 on:** October 13, 2010, 05:10:50 PM »

Quote from: tommywishbone on October 13, 2010, 05:08:53 PM

I strongly object to anyone named "monstercalves" posting in a Coleman thread.

monstercalves · « **Reply #39 on:** October 13, 2010, 05:10:58 PM »

Quote from: tommywishbone on October 13, 2010, 05:08:53 PM

I strongly object to anyone named "monstercalves" posting in a Coleman thread.

lmao ......

tommywishbone.....

did'nt eddie murphy use that name in one of his movies?

johnny wishbone or something?

tommywishbone · « **Reply #40 on:** October 13, 2010, 05:16:34 PM »

You are correct MC. I believe he said, "When you think of criminals, think of Johnny Wishbone."

monstercalves · « **Reply #41 on:** October 13, 2010, 05:19:57 PM »

Quote from: tommywishbone on October 13, 2010, 05:16:34 PM

You are correct MC. I believe he said, "When you think of criminals, think of Johnny Wishbone."

im a bit of a movie geek .....actually surprise myself sometimes

i know people tend to say that from time2time ...... but with this i do

eddie= 1 of top5 best standups of all time!

jwb · « **Reply #42 on:** October 13, 2010, 05:21:43 PM »

Quote from: monstercalves on October 13, 2010, 05:07:16 PM

yes but no part of the quad is called "sweep" in biological terms therfore it cant be torn ......

his quad may have been torn or nerve damage etc .... but the sweep is not torn lool..... because his quad is torn this may effect his quad "sweep""

"Sweep" has always referred to Vastus Lateralis development in bodybuilding layman terms same as back "thickness" is really trap III and IV and rhomboid development.

monstercalves · « **Reply #43 on:** October 13, 2010, 05:28:41 PM »

Quote from: jwb on October 13, 2010, 05:21:43 PM

"Sweep" has always referred to Vastus Lateralis development in bodybuilding layman terms same as back "thickness" is really trap III and IV and rhomboid development.

actually ............. ur right

i picked u up wrong .............

hahaha sorry man ...... im running 3 windows chatting to people at same time

monstercalves · « **Reply #44 on:** October 13, 2010, 05:29:51 PM »

Quote from: jwb on October 13, 2010, 05:21:43 PM

"Sweep" has always referred to Vastus Lateralis development in bodybuilding layman terms same as back "thickness" is really trap III and IV and rhomboid development.

its just not the way i would have worded it so i jumped on u hahahahhaa sorry man!

jwb · « **Reply #45 on:** October 13, 2010, 05:31:09 PM »

Quote from: monstercalves on October 13, 2010, 05:28:41 PM

actually ............. ur right

i picked u up wrong .............

hahaha sorry man ...... im running 3 windows chatting to people at same time

I blame Wiggsy for bumping a 2006 thread...

Wiggs · « **Reply #46 on:** October 13, 2010, 06:50:43 PM »

lol...I didn't even see the date...How the hell did it get to the front page? That's where I responded from.