Author Topic: JAY CUTLER on the cover of new flex.. (Read 7288 times)

theonlyone · « **Reply #25 on:** October 12, 2006, 09:33:46 AM »

Quote from: body88 on October 12, 2006, 09:20:12 AM

Girlie legs is what does separate men from boys.

240 is Back · « **Reply #26 on:** October 12, 2006, 09:43:49 AM »

Quote from: theonlyone on October 12, 2006, 06:01:52 AM

props!

buffbodz · « **Reply #27 on:** October 12, 2006, 09:51:59 AM »

Duh.....I wonder why

KTMckay · « **Reply #28 on:** October 12, 2006, 09:54:39 AM »

I want to hurry up and get this issue and find out how to gain 10 pounds in a month...!

tom joad · « **Reply #29 on:** October 12, 2006, 10:02:30 AM »

Quote from: DonkeyKong on October 12, 2006, 02:33:57 AM

Wow, i hope they feature Jay's nutrition.

Jay knows that he has to eat 1g of protein per lb bodyweight.

Jay eats broccoli every day.

I think Jay also supplements with glutamine.

Chris Glass · « **Reply #30 on:** October 12, 2006, 10:05:19 AM »

This would have been an alternate as well. Very dramatic . I say "good for him". He works so hard. He earned it.

slayer · « **Reply #31 on:** October 12, 2006, 10:30:12 AM »

the front pic looks real good!, looks like a bodybuilder not a cartoon character, i think ronnie dug his own grave by morphing himself into what he was the last several yrs!

that pic of jay will have a lot more mainstream appeal then a morphed up ronnie coleman at 300 lbs!

Slick Vic · « **Reply #32 on:** October 12, 2006, 11:10:25 AM »

Dammit! I thought Arnold was gonna be on the cover!

240 is Back · « **Reply #33 on:** October 12, 2006, 11:19:13 AM »

Quote from: slayer on October 12, 2006, 10:30:12 AM

that pic of jay will have a lot more mainstream appeal then a morphed up ronnie coleman at 300 lbs!

Really? Jay may sell more covers because of his skin color (and idiots who call this racism, you simply don't know advertising). But he's been on multiple covers before, and FLEX circ is still down 59% in the last 5 years.

How do Jay and Ronnie look all that different? Jay has an 80s surfer haircut and baby blues, but his face isn't all that pleasing to look at. Not flaming him - but he certainly doesn't look like a Cook, a Frey, an RJ... His face is misshaped - I don't know if that can be argued.

I know you're a huge jay fan, and he deserved the O crown. but reinventing bbing, making it more popular again... do you really see that happening?

the shadow · « **Reply #34 on:** October 12, 2006, 11:27:28 AM »

Quote from: slayer on October 12, 2006, 10:30:12 AM

the front pic looks real good!, looks like a bodybuilder not a cartoon character, i think ronnie dug his own grave by morphing himself into what he was the last several yrs!

that pic of jay will have a lot more mainstream appeal then a morphed up ronnie coleman at 300 lbs!

i would say jay and ronnie both of them looked huge..i disagree on this fact that ronnie lost cuz he balooned to 290 plus lbs..jay had his weaknesses and ronnie had his..it could have gone either way..ronnie owned jay in the front double bi and the side chest pose..jay had better ab and thigh pose.better back double bi and better lat spread..i would say a tie in the most muscular pose..and yes ronnie was not 300lbs for the olympia..he was close to 292-93lbs..coleman was more vascular..it was tough call..ronnie was better in pose he was better in the other...it was a close call though.dude ronnie has won alot of competions cuz he had mass and separations both.for eg 2004 olympia he was 296lbs and he looked awesome..he still had detailed legs and an amazing back.he totally dwarfed cutler in that show..jay looked like nothing next to coleman in 2004..this year ronnie peaked too early or mybe too late..something did go wrong at the end.but still this year was neck and neck..jay was just a few percent better than ronnie...but nonetheless ronnie is a great mr olympia.arguably one of the best ever

Sean-DeMarco · « **Reply #35 on:** October 12, 2006, 04:52:50 PM »

Quote from: theonlyone on October 12, 2006, 06:01:52 AM

....LOL!!! That's f*cked up!!! LOL!!!

AVBG · « **Reply #36 on:** October 12, 2006, 04:56:42 PM »

I thought Cena was on this months cover?

MattT · « **Reply #37 on:** October 12, 2006, 05:22:04 PM »

Quote from: the shadow on October 12, 2006, 02:26:34 AM

theres our new champ...long live jay

wow he looks smooth and veinless, that back shot is not very good either? why did they choose that one?

beatmaster · « **Reply #38 on:** October 12, 2006, 06:05:13 PM »

i think they are photoshoped, same design in the background, except front pictures, flex will never do that!

wannabebig5 · « **Reply #39 on:** October 12, 2006, 07:07:10 PM »

Quote from: theonlyone on October 12, 2006, 09:33:46 AM

Girlie legs is what does separate men from boys.

weird i thought calves were part of the leg too $:-\$ oh well i guess your always right huh

body88 · « **Reply #40 on:** October 12, 2006, 07:16:06 PM »

Quote from: theonlyone on October 12, 2006, 09:33:46 AM

Girlie legs is what does separate men from boys.

Christ , this guy with absolutly no calves and zero quad detail takes the cake! What do you think happened to his outer quad insertion near the knee? Looks torn!

Check out that midsection baby. He is a true man. Sporting the beer gut!!!aaahahahah

Brutal_1 · « **Reply #41 on:** October 12, 2006, 07:27:06 PM »

Quote from: the shadow on October 12, 2006, 02:26:34 AM

theres our new champ...long live jay

"Long Live"....a pro bodybuilder

Suuuuuuuuuuuuuuuure

Hulkster · « **Reply #42 on:** October 12, 2006, 07:53:42 PM »

LOL the beginning of a new era in pro bodybuilding!

awesome stuff

Stavios · « **Reply #43 on:** October 12, 2006, 07:58:22 PM »

why did they choose those pics ?

there was a lot of better ones

slayer · « **Reply #44 on:** October 12, 2006, 08:43:09 PM »

Quote from: body88 on October 12, 2006, 07:16:06 PM

Christ , this guy with absolutly no calves and zero quad detail takes the cake! What do you think happened to his outer quad insertion near the knee? Looks torn!

Check out that midsection baby. He is a true man. Sporting the beer gut!!!aaahahahah

looks like a peice of crap with chopstix stuck in it!

tommywishbone · « **Reply #45 on:** October 12, 2006, 08:56:07 PM »

Small & soft. Great.

Azure · « **Reply #46 on:** October 12, 2006, 09:40:13 PM »

So what direction are they trying to take this whole thing? I've seen Jay in person and he looks HUGE like a refrigerator...that pic doesn't look right. It looks like they are trying to head in a blonde hair, blue eyed sex symbol. Too bad it doesn't work.

Hulkster · « **Reply #47 on:** October 12, 2006, 09:55:43 PM »

Jay's lower back in the rear double bi is embarrasing.

that would be like showcasing Ronnie's calves on the cover $:-\$

they should not show Jay's back on the cover.

slayer · « **Reply #48 on:** October 12, 2006, 11:24:42 PM »

Quote from: Hulkster on October 12, 2006, 09:55:43 PM

Jay's lower back in the rear double bi is embarrasing.

that would be like showcasing Ronnie's calves on the cover $:-\$

they should not show Jay's back on the cover.

why its the best back in the business right now!

IFBBwannaB · « **Reply #49 on:** October 13, 2006, 02:29:37 AM »

Cutler delts look terrible in these covers,I said it and will keep saying,they arent real!

Author Topic: JAY CUTLER on the cover of new flex.. (Read 7288 times)

theonlyone

KTMckay

Slick Vic

AVBG

body88

Stavios