PAUL DILLET dwarfing NASSER EL SONBATY....(1997)

[Petrucci]

Sorry, but comparing him to Nasser its crazyness...Nasser is on another level (specially on this picture)

[the shadow]

ROFLMAO!  Nasser is utterly destroying Paul in all areas: size, definition, proporting, symmetry, thickness, tan, posture, non-giraffe-neckedness, intelligence, attitude, and total gear intake!  The only thing paul is winning is hairline and height - and the photo was taken at an angle so the extra height is mostly an illusion. 

whatever..paul is making nasser look like flex wheeler..

[the shadow]

damn you people are blind as fuck..he is definetly wider and overall bigger than nasser el somebody

[Old_Rooster]

Yet if I was a judge at that show, Nasser would get the trophy, at least hes in shape.

[the shadow]

Shadow, judging from that shot alone, who would you give the contest to?

paul dillet..dude just go and watch the video of arnold classic 1997..damn he made everyone look like kids

[Old_Rooster]

damn you people are blind as f**k..he is definetly wider and overall bigger than nasser el somebody

So what, in that pic, Dillet has a 2-pack

[the shadow]

So what, in that pic, Dillet has a 2-pack

he s better than you..nuff said jackass

[Old_Rooster]

he s better than you..nuff said jackass

Gosh, you mean a pro that gobbles tons and tons and tons of roids is bigger than me?  oh me, oh my , how could that happen?

And i'm not a jackass by the way, i'm more the son-of-a-bitch type.

[GoneAway]

paul dillet..dude just go and watch the video of arnold classic 1997..damn he made everyone look like kids

I meant from that ONE PIC ALONE (not trying to be rude). Alot can be said about what people judge physiques by, just from looking at that one pic, since they're both hitting the same shot.

Personally, I'd give it to Naz. He's the man and proved it:

1. Thicker, more symmetrical chest
2. Bigger shoulders
3. More arm seperation
4. More seperated legs at the same size as Dillett's.

That's just going by that one pic. Maybe the judges would of seen it differently, but he did place higher than Dillett so I guess they didn't.

[the shadow]

I meant from that ONE PIC ALONE (not trying to be rude). Alot can be said about what people judge physiques by, just from looking at that one pic, since they're both hitting the same shot.

Personally, I'd give it to Naz. He's the man and proved it:

1. Thicker, more symmetrical chest
2. Bigger shoulders
3. More arm seperation
4. More seperated legs at the same size as Dillett's.

That's just going by that one pic. Maybe the judges would of seen it differently, but he did place higher than Dillett so I guess they didn't.

1)wider overall structure
2)more freaky apperance(bodybuilding is all about freaks)
and my conculsion is paul owns nasser

[kyomu]

1)wider overall structure
2)more freaky apperance(bodybuilding is all about freaks)
and my conculsion is paul owns nasser

I saw them competing directly several times and Nasser was always better than Paul.
But if he posed correctly and brought hard detailed back, he could win O several times.

[the shadow]

I saw them competing directly several times and Nasser was always better than Paul.
But if he posed correctly and brought hard detailed back, he could win O several times.

OOOOOOOH SHUT UP..PAUL RULES(no offence brother)