not really, you kept implying i was refering to this article as overwhelming ... in fact i did not 
if you dont think 9/19 hijcakers being alive and well is a bit of a problem considering they were supposed to be atomized upon impact ... well then i cant really help you
He swings ........................
.......... He misses again! The crowd is getting board!
(just so you don't whine about me not addressing your ridiculous point I'll address again)
Here's what i said:
YEah, other than the fact that overwelming evidence shows 19 hijackers and others (terrorists) who have not been brought to justice that were part of it.
Here's your next post (right after mine):
overwhelming evidence like the bbc saying 9 of the 19 hijackers are still alive and well...
keep in mind if the amreekan governmen was willing to kill 3000 of its citizens, lying to them about it probably wouldnt be an "issue" 
You were saying the BBC article was "overwhelming evidence"
Man I'd draw a picture for you if you don't get it this time. Being
as smart as you are you might be able to figure it out then.
if you dont think 9/19 hijcakers being alive and well is a bit of a problem considering they were supposed to be atomized upon impact ... well then i cant really help you
IF 9 of those hijackers were alive and did not die on the planes then of course, young grass hopper, it would be a problem. But an errant report, that has never resurfaced once, or the fact that those terrorist have never been shown alive since (which would be a major victory over the USA if they were shown alive) means that the story was FALSE. This kind of thing happens all the time. but i'm sure your are smart enough to know that.
