« previous next »
Pages: 1 2 3 [4]   Go Down

Author Topic: A pathetic moment in history  (Read 14332 times)

bmacsys

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 6074
  • Getbig!
Re: A pathetic moment in history
« Reply #75 on: December 24, 2006, 04:51:28 PM »
Quote from: pumpster on December 20, 2006, 07:37:07 PM
Come on that's very biased; robbed? It was close; Szkalak dominated him on upper body & lost  on legs so it wasn't a clear choice either way. Robinson & Padilla were also better than Mentzer.

Come on Pumpster, Kal didn't dominate Mentzer on upper body but Mentzer totally dominated Kal on legs. Mentzer was way ahead on prejuding but the crowd swayed the judges during the posedown.
Logged
The House that Ruth built

pumpster

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 18890
  • If you're reading this you have too much free time
Re: A pathetic moment in history
« Reply #76 on: December 24, 2006, 05:02:58 PM »
Quote from: bmacsys on December 24, 2006, 04:51:28 PM
Come on Pumpster, Kal didn't dominate Mentzer on upper body but Mentzer totally dominated Kal on legs. Mentzer was way ahead on prejuding but the crowd swayed the judges during the posedown.
No it was close. Szkalak had the dominant upper body.
Logged

pumpster

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 18890
  • If you're reading this you have too much free time
Re: A pathetic moment in history
« Reply #77 on: December 24, 2006, 05:39:27 PM »
Quote from: Matt C on December 24, 2006, 05:21:54 PM
Look at Zane's arms compared to Mentzer's.  They look small.
And? Same differential standing next to Robinson or Padilla. Didn't matter with good conditioning and politics on his side.

BTW you can see from that shot that Mentzer was not in top condition compared with Zane & Dickerson, evident in the quads.
Logged
Pages: 1 2 3 [4]   Go Up
« previous next »