Does Chick hate Dorian Yates?

[davidpaul]

His smooth back ruined it for him. He had no chance of ever winning an Olympia when Yates was around.

his back genetically wasnt detailed, but he destroyed yates from the front.

[Palpatine Q]

Because Dorian sucked.... He was the worst Mr. Olympia. Dorian was a big block of crap. He was big yes.... but he was crap. Do you want big crap to be your Mr. O?

You mean like the current Mr O?

[pumpster]

his back genetically wasnt detailed, but he destroyed yates from the front.

Yates was owned frequently from the front - not what you'd expect from someone supposely the world's best built man.

According to even fairly recent interviews, he actually still believes that he deserved all of his wins.

[D.L. 5]

damn paul dillet makes dorian look tiny in that pic... especially look at the arms...

how does dorian place above dillet in that comp?

[TrueGrit]

he turns around.

he actually looks a little less disgusting too.

[pumpster]

damn paul dillet makes dorian look tiny in that pic... especially look at the arms...

how does dorian place above dillet in that comp?

Looking at the frontal pics (the most important) you'd never think Yates beat Paul. Dillet completely destroyed him. Paul's back wasn't as bad as the ownage here from the front.

Obviously there are lots of politics in the contests.

Even Flea Labrada looked like Sergio next to Dorian.

[pobrecito]

Dillet was all drugs.

Would have been a pathetic Mr. O.

[Cap]

Dillet was all drugs.

Would have been a pathetic Mr. O.

Are you out of your mind?  What's your opinion of Wheeler then?  or Levrone?  He dropped all kinds of weight and blew up come contest?  Should Arnold be lumped in there since he responded like nobody else in the history of BBing?  That is a short sighted comment to make and I guarantee that Paul and his joints (which are probably better than most out there) would laugh in your face.  You think Dorian went from those skinny skin head pics to 267 pounds in contest without a shit load of test and GH, which started the trend of shit BBers to follow?  Answer those questions and that will tell us how intelligent you really are on this subject.

[TrueGrit]

dillet's back was so bad he looked bad from the front too. that is the one post where he can use his biceps to hide his baby lats.

[BUCK 65]

Dorian had also set the standard for conditioning at the "super size" level.He may not have to deserved to win in some people's eyes, but the same could be said for pretty much any Mr.O
Dorian is among the very best all time.

[Cap]

dillet's back was so bad he looked bad from the front too. that is the one post where he can use his biceps to hide his baby lats.

Not even close.  He was very impressive from the front and his back was huge, just couldn't pose it.

[Hulkster]

Agreed.  Probably a good two Olympias.

hahaha agreed.

two olympias. not six.

Dorian pre tear was pretty good compared to his competition.

post tear was when things stared to fall apart, particularly in 94.

 Bob Chick was right on the money.

dorian had an ugly, powerlifter type physique, even if he had great abs and calves.

and I bet ND is just going to love this thread hahahaha

reality is something that the dorian nuthuggers do not like to confront.

This is just GREAT!

[BUCK 65]

Hulkster -don't use out of image photos to make the point.
Dorian didn't look good towards the end-but he was unbelievable the majority of times he competed

[Hulkster]

Hulkster -don't use out of image photos to make the point.
Dorian didn't look good towards the end-but he was unbelievable the majority of times he competed

he looked good pre biceps and quad tear.

problem is, that was at the beginning of his career.

94, 96 and 97 were really bad years.

the judges awarded his wins based on the doctrine of size/width over quality at all costs.

hence, why he won in 94 over a near perfect (but much smaller) Shawn Ray.

I have never agreed with this philosophy.

apparently, many others, like Bob do not agree with it either.

[Cap]

Dorian's mass and conditioning astound me but aside from a few pics, he looks like ass.  Levrone and Ray should have his Sandows from 94-97

[Hulkster]

Dorian's mass and conditioning astound me but aside from a few pics, he looks like ass.  Levrone and Ray should have his Sandows from 94-97

agreed.

[NarcissisticDeity]

he looked good pre biceps and quad tear.

problem is, that was at the beginning of his career.

94, 96 and 97 were really bad years.

the judges awarded his wins based on the doctrine of size/width over quality at all costs.

hence, why he won in 94 over a near perfect (but much smaller) Shawn Ray.

I have never agreed with this philosophy.

apparently, many others, like Bob do not agree with it either.

Baseless garbage , he did NOT look great in 97 every other year he easily beat the ' competition '

[pumpster]

Not even close.  He was very impressive from the front and his back was huge, just couldn't pose it.

Nailed it. Overall, Dillet crushed Yates. Dillet's back is just an excuse, wasn't nearly as bad as the ownage visited on Yates by several tops guys in about 35 shots.

[Hulkster]

hahaha there are a whole lot of people on this board who apparently agree with this 'baseless garbage'

[NarcissisticDeity]

hahaha there are a whole lot of people on this board who apparently agree with this 'baseless garbage'

And like you there are a whole LOT of people on this board who are ignorant , you post a few select pictures and base your ' opinion ' on them , its very limited and biased

I personally think Dorian should have lost in 1997 but every other year he was the clear winner , regardless of what you think

[NarcissisticDeity]

Nailed it. Overall, Dillet crushed Yates. Dillet's back is just an excuse, wasn't nearly as bad as the ownage visited on Yates by several tops guys in about 35 shots.

Dillett never crushed Yates this statement alone shows your limited comprehension of how bodybuilding contests are judged , very rarely was Dillett hard or dry and his back is an excuse? another retard statement by pumpster his back which is a major area was a severe liability ( see Nasser ) especially compared to someone who had the best back , stick to giving training advice on the Bow Flex because your knowledge of competitive bodybuilding is like Dillett's back ...........severly lacking

[Cap]

Dillett never crushed Yates this statement alone shows your limited comprehension of how bodybuilding contests are judged , very rarely was Dillett hard or dry and his back is an excuse? another retard statement by pumpster his back which is a major area was a severe liability ( see Nasser ) especially compared to someone who had the best back , stick to giving training advice on the Bow Flex because your knowledge of competitive bodybuilding is like Dillett's back ...........severly lacking

Dude he never gave training advice on the Bowflex.  He said it shouldn't be dismissed because Arnold or Dorian never used it.  Narrow mindedness in BBing leads to shitty physiques and people saying that one size fits all.

[D.L. 5]

milos looks amazing in that pic...like a bodybuilder should.

simply put paul dillet should have a sandow (especially from those pics), shawn ray should and levrone too... they ahve great physiques.

[pumpster]

simply put paul dillet should have a sandow (especially from those pics), shawn ray should and levrone too... they ahve great physiques.

Pithy & concise. That they never won's a joke. The 35 pics showing clear Yates ownage don't lie.

[NarcissisticDeity]

Dude he never gave training advice on the Bowflex.  He said it shouldn't be dismissed because Arnold or Dorian never used it.  Narrow mindedness in BBing leads to shitty physiques and people saying that one size fits all.

NO ONE who ever accomplished ANYTHING in bodybuilding used a Bow Flex and the best physiques in the history have been forged using free weights , Bow Flex is junk