The theory is that Bush let it happen/knew it would happen, and allowed it.
Why?
Cheney and haliburton has negotiated with taleban thru the 90s about an oil pipeline in afghanistan. (energy and us govt are very closely connected, which is very important.)
Taleban took millions from us, then signed with a south american company for their oil. This hurt the US bad.
Bush knew that an attack attributed to bin laden (who was a CIA asset from the 80s thru late 90s that we know of), would justify a war in afghanistan. (and put troops in position for an attack on iraq later).
aug 5- german tells bush that ISR told them an attack was coming. Date, target, and 5 of the hijackers names.
aug 6- monster report from head of FBI - he rushes to crawford TX on an emergency trip. Condi accepts his report then never reads it.
If you're honestly curious, check out Loose Change - a "Intro to 911"
http://video.google.com/videoplay?docid=7866929448192753501&q=loose+change&hl=en
It's not perfect, but contains a few "smoking guns", and really makes you think. It avoids politics - and focuses on evidence. And some of the evidence, wow...
I'll look at it 240, those facts do jibe, but I aint big on circumstantial evidence cases. Ive Seen to many bad ones.
Still, there are some things about Bush that are terribly wrong @ this point. And even many of his hardcore conservative pals cant stomach him anymore. (Im more along the lines of civil Libertarian frame of thought).
This total lack of concern about the southern border and NAU evidence is just repulsive. There is such a thing as going to far.
