Author Topic: MuscleMag - 300th anniversary issue  (Read 4584 times)

timfogarty

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 7115
  • @fogartyTim on twitter
Re: MuscleMag - 300th anniversary issue. LOL
« Reply #25 on: March 30, 2007, 05:47:06 PM »
I believe MuscleMag started publishing in 1974. They were quarterly at first. Issue 300 marks the 34th year.

http://musclememory.com/mags.php?mmi

Quote
While the word anniversary technically means a yearly occurrence, it doesn't matter, as we all know what is means.

one would think someone who publishes a magazine would know the correct use of the language in which they publish

pumphard

  • Getbig IV
  • ****
  • Posts: 1553
  • Getbig!
Re: MuscleMag - 300th anniversary issue. LOL
« Reply #26 on: March 30, 2007, 05:51:52 PM »
Right now I think Flex has become the worst.  All they have is nice pics, there articles are garbage.

Pollux

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 7441
  • I'm kind of a big deal!
Re: MuscleMag - 300th anniversary issue. LOL
« Reply #27 on: March 30, 2007, 08:04:59 PM »
it's not even a magazine anymore, it's just a catalog for Muscle Tech supplements.  ::)

Bingo!

beatmaster

  • Getbig IV
  • ****
  • Posts: 2819
  • Save a tree, eat a beaver
Re: MuscleMag - 300th anniversary issue. LOL
« Reply #28 on: March 30, 2007, 08:21:56 PM »

cover look good, nice pic of lee with his tattoo!
are you delusional?

tommywishbone

  • Competitors II
  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 20500
  • Biscuit
Re: MuscleMag - 300th anniversary issue. LOL
« Reply #29 on: March 30, 2007, 11:09:02 PM »
MuscleMag first came out in 1707... excellent. I remember the big Sir Walter Raleigh v. Benjamin Franklin issue. Sir Walter was tight, but Benjamin was much better.
a

Matt C

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 12752
  • The White Vince Goodrum
Re: MuscleMag - 300th anniversary issue. LOL
« Reply #30 on: March 30, 2007, 11:54:38 PM »
one would think someone who publishes a magazine would know the correct use of the language in which they publish

It reminds me of an article that Bob Kennedy wrote in an issue not too long ago titled something along the lines of "blast your lowers" - even though "lower biceps" do not exist anywhere in human anatomy.

Then again, FLEX is guilty of the same...

http://findarticles.com/p/articles/mi_m0KFY/is_7_20/ai_98542750/pg_1
Bodybuilding Pro.com

gtbro1

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 6893
Re: MUSCLEMAG INT. 300th Issue>>>
« Reply #31 on: March 31, 2007, 01:24:51 AM »
Read MMI from day one, when Zulak sold out I stopped buying it, Still read the old ones though. When Branch Warren was a teen. Bob Chic was a Deputy Sheriff.


I agree. The old "Uncensored" column was great...until about 2000-2001 when Zulak started to disguise muscletech plugs for actual advice.

dr.chimps

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 28635
  • Chimpus ergo sum
Re: MuscleMag - 300th anniversary issue. LOL
« Reply #32 on: March 31, 2007, 04:39:15 AM »
MuscleMag first came out in 1707... excellent. I remember the big Sir Walter Raleigh v. Benjamin Franklin issue. Sir Walter was tight, but Benjamin was much better.
LOL. Would have been aces if you used guys actually alive at that time.  :)

New Hank Wood

  • Time Out
  • Getbig IV
  • *
  • Posts: 3712
Re: MuscleMag - 300th anniversary issue. LOL
« Reply #33 on: March 31, 2007, 05:24:20 AM »
cover look good, nice pic of lee with his tattoo!

I hope Lee's association with Muscle Mag works out.  He has had a string of bad luck over the past year and hopefully 2007 is a lot brighter.

Lee has made some poor choices over his career; the face tatoo, his marriage to Cathy desintergrating, the Adela fiasco, manic behaviour and the termination of lucrative contracts, just to name a few.

Hope everything goes well for the little guy. He deserves a break!

Colossus_1986

  • Competitors II
  • Getbig IV
  • *****
  • Posts: 2640
Re: MuscleMag - 300th anniversary issue. LOL
« Reply #34 on: March 31, 2007, 07:30:34 AM »
MuscleMag first came out in 1707... excellent. I remember the big Sir Walter Raleigh v. Benjamin Franklin issue. Sir Walter was tight, but Benjamin was much better.

i believe Muscletech was running ads back in the day...
products like : "YE OLDE PUMPTECHIUS"
they never improved the formula since :-\

GHGut

  • Getbig III
  • ***
  • Posts: 444
  • Getbig!
Re: MuscleMag - 300th anniversary issue. LOL
« Reply #35 on: March 31, 2007, 10:21:40 AM »
i believe Muscletech was running ads back in the day...
products like : "YE OLDE PUMPTECHIUS"
they never improved the formula since :-\

You guys all forget that Tom Paine got SCREWED at that show. He should have won. I've seen the illustrations. His loss helped fuel his drinking.


CARTEL

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 5213
  • Have a good time, all the time.
Re: MuscleMag - 300th anniversary issue. LOL
« Reply #36 on: March 31, 2007, 10:28:18 AM »
You guys all forget that Tom Paine got SCREWED at that show. He should have won. I've seen the illustrations. His loss helped fuel his drinking.


Dude, you're crazy. No way did he get screwed. I saw Paine coming in 5th at best.

tommywishbone

  • Competitors II
  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 20500
  • Biscuit
Re: MuscleMag - 300th anniversary issue. LOL
« Reply #37 on: March 31, 2007, 02:52:21 PM »
i believe Muscletech was running ads back in the day...
products like : "YE OLDE PUMPTECHIUS"
they never improved the formula since :-\

 ;D
a

tommywishbone

  • Competitors II
  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 20500
  • Biscuit
Re: MuscleMag - 300th anniversary issue. LOL
« Reply #38 on: March 31, 2007, 02:54:56 PM »
LOL. Would have been aces if you used guys actually alive at that time.  :)

 ;D  I guess you're right. I think Sir Walter might have been dead, and Ben Franklin wasn't born yet. Oh well, it was still a great issue.
a

GHGut

  • Getbig III
  • ***
  • Posts: 444
  • Getbig!
Re: MuscleMag - 300th anniversary issue. LOL
« Reply #39 on: March 31, 2007, 06:04:27 PM »
Dude, you're crazy. No way did he get screwed. I saw Paine coming in 5th at best.

Franklin's Poor Richard's Almanac was coming out that year. The publishers needed him to place high to promote the publication. That's why Franklin placed above Paine.

I will not, however, dispute the Marquis de Lafayette's placing out of the top 10. He was way too smooth.

gtbro1

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 6893
Re: MuscleMag - 300th anniversary issue. LOL
« Reply #40 on: March 31, 2007, 08:56:40 PM »
You guys all forget that Tom Paine got SCREWED at that show. He should have won. I've seen the illustrations. His loss helped fuel his drinking.



  ALL DRUGS

G o a t b o y

  • Time Out
  • Getbig V
  • *
  • Posts: 21431
  • Time-Out in Dubai, India with Swampi the Cocksmith
Re: MuscleMag - 300th anniversary issue. LOL
« Reply #41 on: March 31, 2007, 09:01:44 PM »
While the word anniversary technically means a yearly occurrence, it doesn't matter, as we all know what is means.


Yeah, it's not like accuracy is important or anything.  This IS the "bodybuilding industry", after all, not a real industry.  ::)
Ron: "I am lazy."

haider

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 11978
  • Team Batman Squats
Re: MuscleMag - 300th anniversary issue
« Reply #42 on: March 31, 2007, 09:13:38 PM »
LOL why even call it an anniversary?
follow the arrows

Colossus_1986

  • Competitors II
  • Getbig IV
  • *****
  • Posts: 2640
Re: MuscleMag - 300th anniversary issue
« Reply #43 on: April 02, 2007, 06:47:32 AM »
LOL why even call it an anniversary?

i would have called it 300th Issue: Special collectors issue or something...
but if they wanna say they've been around for 300 years...fine!