Author Topic: DogAte  (Read 3290 times)

Option D

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 17367
  • Kelly the Con Way
Re: The dog ate the Attorneygate e-mails
« Reply #25 on: April 12, 2007, 11:59:08 AM »
I never cared about clinton, serious...and thought it was a waste of time back then. Much better things to waste time on

So you disassociate yourself when convient, but then lump opposition together for a stance on certian issues.

militarymuscle69

  • Getbig IV
  • ****
  • Posts: 2655
  • You can't be a citizen unless you serve
Re: The dog ate the Attorneygate e-mails
« Reply #26 on: April 12, 2007, 12:03:16 PM »
So you disassociate yourself when convient, but then lump opposition together for a stance on certian issues.

what are you talking about? I have always said I like clinton
gotta love life

240 is Back

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 102396
  • Complete website for only $300- www.300website.com
Re: The dog ate the Attorneygate e-mails
« Reply #27 on: April 12, 2007, 12:12:14 PM »
what are you talking about? I have always said I like clinton

you are liberal scum.  thanks for runing america.

militarymuscle69

  • Getbig IV
  • ****
  • Posts: 2655
  • You can't be a citizen unless you serve
Re: The dog ate the Attorneygate e-mails
« Reply #28 on: April 12, 2007, 12:17:05 PM »
you are liberal scum.  thanks for runing america.

wait, I know you aren't calling me liberal...
gotta love life

ribonucleic

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 5158
  • I bring you ultimate reality!
Re: The dog ate the Attorneygate e-mails
« Reply #29 on: April 12, 2007, 02:01:36 PM »
<< Sen. Leahy, the emails you are looking for are, or until very recently were (and can probably still be found if somebody who Knows How goes looking) in an old bank building in Chattanooga Tennessee...

I still maintain that if the GovTech/SmartTech/Coptix people have three brain cells to rub together they have copies of all of this stuff, either duplicated to another server or pulled off onto CDs which now repose in some lawyer’s office. Because those are all that can possibly save them from charges of destroying evidence.

Look at it this way: if this had been a kiddy porn operation they were hosting nobody would bat an eye at throwing them in jail if they claimed that all the communications had been “automatically wiped every 30 days” or whatever. They would be seen as covering for filthy disgusting criminals.

Well….criminal is as criminal does. And criminal is whatever the charge is that’s listed on the indictment. >>

http://www.correntewire.com/todays_episode_of_as_the_gwb43_com_turns_the_dog_ate_my_emails

24KT

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 24455
  • Gold Savings Account Rep +1 (310) 409-2244
Re: The dog ate the Attorneygate e-mails
« Reply #30 on: April 12, 2007, 06:46:51 PM »
All I was interested in is seeing if you're consistent in your views. If you are then IMO that's a good thing. If you're not then IMO it makes you a hypocrite. I don't like Clinton nor his wife but I also don't care if he lied about getting a blowjob. I do care that he bombed a factory to deflect attention away from said blowjob though.

I honestly think there are those who saw the nations obsession with Clinton's extracurricular activities, as keeping him too occupied to respond, and saw it as their time to make a move. According to Sandy Berger, Clinton said something to the effect of "If I don't act, they will claim I'm too preoccupied by legal woes, If I do act, they'll claim, I'm attempting to divert attention. I'm gonna catch it either way, ...so we might as well do what needs to be done"
w

ieffinhatecardio

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 5202
  • More proof God is a man.
Re: The dog ate the Attorneygate e-mails
« Reply #31 on: April 12, 2007, 07:31:44 PM »
I honestly think there are those who saw the nations obsession with Clinton's extracurricular activities, as keeping him too occupied to respond, and saw it as their time to make a move. According to Sandy Berger, Clinton said something to the effect of "If I don't act, they will claim I'm too preoccupied by legal woes, If I do act, they'll claim, I'm attempting to divert attention. I'm gonna catch it either way, ...so we might as well do what needs to be done"

Uh yeah, except killing innocent people wasn't what needed to be done. The facts remain, he bombed the wrong target at a time when he was fighting that ridiculous scandal. I think he did to deflect attention, and considering the factory wasn't what he said it was helps prove my point.

24KT

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 24455
  • Gold Savings Account Rep +1 (310) 409-2244
Re: The dog ate the Attorneygate e-mails
« Reply #32 on: April 12, 2007, 07:37:31 PM »
Uh yeah, except killing innocent people wasn't what needed to be done. The facts remain, he bombed the wrong target at a time when he was fighting that ridiculous scandal. I think he did to deflect attention, and considering the factory wasn't what he said it was helps prove my point.

faulty intel?  :-\    Ya gotta admit tho, ...at least he didn't keep the killing spree going for 4 yrs.

What a sad state of affairs when we can say one guy is better than another because he killed less innocents.   :'(
w