No sir you missed my point. I am saying it should be ok if someone chooses to have a white channel or a black channel or a indian channel or a martian channel it should be ok. Its not. You can have black channels and NAACP but you could not have a white version. I think it's great to have pride in your race, whatever it is but in todays society if you tried that as a white man you automatically get labled a racist. Thats not fair is my point. Its all about the lable not the act. You could have a white's only channel that did nothing but supported white people without hate of others, just like other people have channels that make them feel good about being whatever they want. Does that make it clearer?
Do you know why they have BET? because dude, maybe 2% of the people on other stations are black, the rest are white.
Thats why you don't need WET, you have it already. To create a WET would do nothing but be clear you are ramming it to the black people. Wanna keep being fair? then have every company fire half their employees and truly make it 50% white, 50% black.
Know why you don't need an NAACP, you already have a pretty much all white organization, its called COngress and the senate and the presidency. The NAACP is for the advancement of colored people, to get them equally employed. Whats your white organazation going to do? run the small percentage of blacks in upper management off?
Sorry but requests like you are making are pure and simple, racist.
