Author Topic: Dennis Wolf (Read 6448 times)

donrhummy · « **on:** April 16, 2007, 02:34:37 PM »

With all the hype that was given to Federov, why haven't we heard more about Wolf? i think he has better potential. He's got WIDE shoulders (see him stand next to other BB's) with a tiny waist and all he really needs is thicker lats and calves. He's got a LOT of potential.

Buttsuck · « **Reply #1 on:** April 16, 2007, 02:36:22 PM »

Because he has a tiny waist..... who wants to see a tiny waist on stage. Everything must be big

Royalty · « **Reply #2 on:** April 16, 2007, 03:36:11 PM »

this guy is impressive....In the muscular develpment pics with Ruhl he looked very good. Great overall width and delt mass. Good taper too.

ChrisGlass · « **Reply #3 on:** April 16, 2007, 03:42:04 PM »

I'm a fan. I think the guy can maximze on a look that will get a lot of attention. Outlook sounds good for someone with size and symmetry... Isn't that the goal?

MikeThaMachine · « **Reply #4 on:** April 16, 2007, 03:45:20 PM »

He is probably my favortie new pro, I think he will surpass Heath once his name gets out there as long as he keeps improving in the right ways. Don't forget he is still in his 20's.

Royalty · « **Reply #5 on:** April 16, 2007, 03:48:49 PM »

Quote from: MikeThaMachine on April 16, 2007, 03:45:20 PM

He is probably my favortie new pro

I think he is the best German on the scene now....and thats saying a lot when you have guys like Ruhl, Schlierkamp, and Rockel in the biz

Buttsuck · « **Reply #6 on:** April 16, 2007, 04:08:18 PM »

Quote from: Royalty on April 16, 2007, 03:48:49 PM

I think he is the best German on the scene now....and thats saying a lot when you have guys like Ruhl, Schlierkamp, and Rockel in the biz

Nahhh gunter is better and wont be topped for a while. You just can't beat his width.

ether · « **Reply #7 on:** April 16, 2007, 04:09:29 PM »

Gunter is not better, all the aesthetics of a door frame.

Wolf is really impressive....his quads blow me away.

Huge arms too.

Needs to bring up his calves and back a bit.

Won't be touched.

Buttsuck · « **Reply #8 on:** April 16, 2007, 04:11:54 PM »

Quote from: ether on April 16, 2007, 04:09:29 PM

Gunter is not better, all the aesthetics of a door frame.

Wolf is really impressive....his quads blow me away.

Huge arms too.

Needs to bring up his calves and back a bit.

Won't be touched.

Wrong again.... Gunter is has the widest shoulders and is easily the biggest guy on the stage today. He has one structural flaw and that is his waist.

Buttsuck · « **Reply #9 on:** April 16, 2007, 04:15:07 PM »

Buttsuck · « **Reply #10 on:** April 16, 2007, 04:19:00 PM »

Easily 2nd place here..... Listen to the audience... Whose name is shouted the most?

Buttsuck · « **Reply #11 on:** April 16, 2007, 04:23:06 PM »

Yet another video of Gunters greatness. The crowd is going wild... since when do you get that kind of reaction from a crowd? This guy IS what bodybuilding is suppose to be about.

240 is Back · « **Reply #12 on:** April 16, 2007, 04:24:25 PM »

Wolf has great potential if he doesn't burn out.

But Fedorov was a genetic freak - the guys legs seriously were bigger than Coleman's.

Buttsuck · « **Reply #13 on:** April 16, 2007, 04:25:08 PM »

Quote from: 240 is Back on April 16, 2007, 04:24:25 PM

Wolf has great potential if he doesn't burn out.

But Fedorov was a genetic freak - the guys legs seriously were bigger than Coleman's.

Indeed... wolf will be great.

muscularny · « **Reply #14 on:** April 16, 2007, 04:41:11 PM »

def serious potential

just 27 amazing

pumpher · « **Reply #15 on:** April 16, 2007, 05:40:53 PM »

Serious facial resemblance to William Dafoe

SWOLETRAIN · « **Reply #16 on:** April 16, 2007, 05:43:52 PM »

wow he does look like dafoe

donrhummy · « **Reply #17 on:** April 16, 2007, 07:36:17 PM »

Quote from: Buttsuck on April 16, 2007, 04:08:18 PM

Nahhh gunter is better and wont be topped for a while. You just can't beat his width.

I thought Gunter quit BB?

Camel Jockey · « **Reply #18 on:** April 16, 2007, 07:39:46 PM »

He doesn't have shitty triceps like Gunter or Ruhl.

The guy looks awesome!

Tokyo Joe · « **Reply #19 on:** April 16, 2007, 07:42:50 PM »

I think he'd make a better pro wrestler, too many structural flaws to be a top pro

Most top pros make an impact early in their pro career ala flex, dorian, ray, heath etc.

Buttsuck · « **Reply #20 on:** April 16, 2007, 07:43:50 PM »

Quote from: Camel Jockey on April 16, 2007, 07:39:46 PM

He doesn't have shitty triceps like Gunter or Ruhl.

The guy looks awesome!

Who cares about triceps.....

Quote from: donrhummy on April 16, 2007, 07:36:17 PM

I thought Gunter quit BB?

He is taking a break i think.... he may do the O this year though

Camel Jockey · « **Reply #21 on:** April 16, 2007, 07:44:31 PM »

Quote from: Tokyo Joe on April 16, 2007, 07:42:50 PM

I think he'd make a better pro wrestler

If a rookie pro doesn't make a big impact early ala flex, heath, leverone, they never do

What would be his gimmick? A descendant of an SS officer?

donrhummy · « **Reply #22 on:** April 16, 2007, 07:50:45 PM »

Quote from: Tokyo Joe on April 16, 2007, 07:42:50 PM

I think he'd make a better pro wrestler, too many structural flaws to be a top pro

Such as?

He doesn't have any structural flaws. He's actually got great genetics. Even his small calves aren't small because they're high, he just hasn't taken the time to develop them (look at their insertion point). His lats aren't too high at all and his clavicles are actually wide - not just large delts.

Tokyo Joe · « **Reply #23 on:** April 16, 2007, 08:19:35 PM »

Quote from: Camel Jockey on April 16, 2007, 07:44:31 PM

What would be his gimmick? A descendant of an SS officer?

Dennis the menace, Werewolf..

He's got good genetics, hence he's a pro but lacks triceps, bicep peak, calves, lat width to hang at the top

donrhummy · « **Reply #24 on:** April 16, 2007, 08:31:43 PM »

Quote from: Tokyo Joe on April 16, 2007, 08:19:35 PM

Dennis the menace, Werewolf..

He's got good genetics, hence he's a pro but lacks triceps, bicep peak, calves, lat width to hang at the top

Those aren't structural flaws. A structural flaw would be if his tricep had a very high insertion point. His do not. They actually insert fairly low down his upper arm bone. There's a BIG diff. A guy with structural flaws will pretty much never reach the top because no matter how much muscle he builds, it'll always look off/inferior, etc. A guy without structural flaws but lacking in size in some areas simply needs to keep working on it/finetuning but he CAN eventually get there.

An example: no matter how much Greg Kovacs works out and adds muscle, his physique will never look good enough to win Mr. O. Never. On the other hand, Flex Wheeler at the NPC California Championships was too small but obviously had the POTENTIAL to reach the top.