Bob I AM having fun, beleive me. Your endless supply of inaccuracies is most entertaining.
Nothing I have stated is innaccurate
"the IFBB does not selectively enforce its rules."
"no wait, the IFBB can enforce whatever rules it chooses"
The rules are the rules...if they are broken , the individual case is looked at and a decision is rendered...no different than the court of law...you still have yet to show me where the rules have been selectively enforced, as you are claiming.
Chick in case you haven't figured it out yet, you have performed what is commonly known as a self-contradiction.
Based on your own words it seems that you cannot decide whether or not the IFBB selectively enforces its rules.Still waiting for your examples....as stated previously...the RULES are NOT selectively enforced as I gave examples.Well Chick, you can't have it both ways. Sorry to say that you have been extremely inaccurate, not to mention misleading.
I've been neither...you just don't understand what is written...not my problem.
The constitution states "This constitution governs only amateur sport"
right below it. Does this now also apply to the pros because you said so?
No, the Code of Ethics are for all, as the "IFBB Pro league" is a part of the IFBB....they are listed right under the constitution...look it up meathead...
No need to get upset, I simply followed your directions and made it quite apparent that your argument has no backing.
You first talked about a code of conduct which doesn't exist or at least you can't seem to tell me where it exists
I told you exactly where it is...you cant see....CODE OF ETHICS
Actually you told me where to look up the constitution, which, for the 10th time, applies only to amateurs.
Then you talked about a constitution which, according to the website, only applies to amateurs
and now you are telling me about how the code of ethics allows certain rules in the rule book to broken, and others to be enforced at all times?
Here you go..not that difficult:
www.ifbbprofessionalleag ue.com
look under RULESOnce again, you cant seem to comprehend...they are TWO DIFFERENT ENTITIES.
TWO different entities which according to you, one entity’s vagueness can be applied to the other entity. Doesn’t sound very different to me.
I never said anything like that...Bob could you tell us exactly where the in the rulebook the IFBB distinguishes between rules followed (i.e. Lee's suspention) and rules not followed (unethical use of perfomance enhancing drugs).
Still waiting for the answer on this one
Still the same answer...
The rules are followed..show me where they arent.
Still the same answer? Creating a smokescreen to hide the fact that rules being broken?
Section 8
Rule 8.1
please explain what the IFBB is doing to enforce this rule.
That onus is up to the IFBB...not me, and certainly not the athletes...if they wish to test...thats their right...if they dont...they don't.
So the IFBB is turning a blind eye to rule 8.1, while readily enforcing other rules…aka selective enforcement of rules.
As I stated...they reserve the right to test, and they have in the past, as evidenced by many guys who have failed the test and been subject to fines/ suspention. Nowhere does it say that EVERY show will be tested, or any timeframe.Very good Chick, I didn’t think you would finally admit that the IFBB rule book is somewhat of a joke.
The rules state quite clearly, the IFBB reserves the right to drug test, and anyone found in violation may be subject to fines/ suspention.
IF they test, and IF someone fails, then they are subject to the rules.....ask Shawn if they've ever enforced it.
All you're doing is showing your ignorance and lack of comprehension skills...keep going fool.
All your doing is showing us how much of a joke the IFBBs rule book is, while providing comic value with your weak arguments
Your knowledge of law and how to interperet it, are grade school level at best...stick to posting bullshit.
Your knowledge of the English language and ability to interpret simple sentences varies with how badly it would make your organization look. Stick to the MC gigs and your radio show, as you speak a lot more intelligently than you write.
You keep telling yourself that.....and I'm still waiting for those examples you insist on...WHERE ARE THEY?