Author Topic: Liverpool lost because.....  (Read 2216 times)

nzmusclemonster

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 13693
  • Serenity Now!
Liverpool lost because.....
« on: May 23, 2007, 02:00:17 PM »
Sissoko wasn't playing  ::) ::) ::) ::)
P

xxxLinda

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 4918
  • thank you Ron & Getbig, I've had so much fun
Re: Liverpool lost because.....
« Reply #1 on: May 23, 2007, 03:06:48 PM »
Too true.  Kewell was a nice sight though.  But why the f**k would you bring Octopus Crouch on at the end?


We lost because the first goal was hand ball.  the second one was waaaaa, I could've done that in high heels, long dangly earrings and a ballgown.  the liverpool goal was offside.  T'was funny though.  We're great losers.  It, oh I could talk about it...  wanna?

I watched the 2nd half with my Italian neighbour.  He's not from Milan.  But he explained to me the Bertoldkfjo past President owner of everything in Italy thing.  We reckon he paid gazzzlions to some one.
xL

Diesel1

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 6261
Re: Liverpool lost because.....
« Reply #2 on: May 23, 2007, 03:28:48 PM »
Sissoko wasn't playing  ::) ::) ::) ::)

They couldn't put the ball away, Pennents final balls in were woeful. Crouch should have been on from the start. And Alonso..... well nuff said  ::)

noc

  • Getbig IV
  • ****
  • Posts: 1429
Re: Liverpool lost because.....
« Reply #3 on: May 23, 2007, 05:12:10 PM »
wasnt meant to be tonight like

we controlled the game pretty well - with zenden in the team  ::)

girl ref blew early

at end of day were still the only team from england to achieve anything in europe.

mancs last european cup final was last century  ::)

its only on loan in freezing bollocks moscow we'll bring it back home

xxxLinda

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 4918
  • thank you Ron & Getbig, I've had so much fun
Re: Liverpool lost because.....
« Reply #4 on: May 23, 2007, 05:20:56 PM »
riissee was good in the first half...


I agree with you but I'm still a bit upset because I really reckoned we had it but hey...



what do you reckon with my " the Italian ex-president pays them to lose" theory?

xxxLinda

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 4918
  • thank you Ron & Getbig, I've had so much fun
Re: Liverpool lost because.....
« Reply #5 on: May 23, 2007, 05:24:01 PM »
wasnt meant to be tonight like


say that in Liverpuddlian?

we're great losers...
xL

That American investment will be fun to watch.

xxxLinda

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 4918
  • thank you Ron & Getbig, I've had so much fun
Re: Liverpool lost because.....
« Reply #6 on: May 23, 2007, 05:32:32 PM »


#### ref blew early


the ref needed specs.  in the first half he's letting them score hand ball and allowing fouls and they (the opposition, the white shirty ones, they didn't even take their shirts off at the end ones), kept fouling us and then falling over.

sillyness.  i'm convinced someone paid someone.  not our goalie, but wtf was that?

we was robbed.
no worries, i laughed.  I'll sing and dance again next year...

J. Chimpo

  • Getbig II
  • **
  • Posts: 76
Re: Liverpool lost because.....
« Reply #7 on: May 24, 2007, 03:55:23 AM »
Not the best of finals, Liverpool was to impotent in front of the goal and AC Milan wasn't but better luck next time Liverpool you're a great team but for now   

          AC Milan are Champions of Europe

Bluto

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 33175
  • Well?
Re: Liverpool lost because.....
« Reply #8 on: May 24, 2007, 04:25:52 AM »
Liverpool, Chelsea, Man u - and still in the end an Italian team is the winner!

Love it!

Z

xxxLinda

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 4918
  • thank you Ron & Getbig, I've had so much fun
Re: Liverpool lost because.....
« Reply #9 on: May 24, 2007, 06:08:21 AM »
Liverpool, Chelsea, Man u - and still in the end an Italian team is the winner!

Love it!



I still say Berto whatisname paid someone, big time.

No worries, I'm over it now.
But I've got one hell of a hangover.


The first goal was not hand ball, it was shouldered in and bounced offa Pepe's legs. 

& the second Milan goal, having re-watched the re-play, wasn't half bad in the end.  But I still think it was rigged.

whatever
xL

Looking forward to Wimbledon...

...and Liverpool's next season!

xxxLinda

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 4918
  • thank you Ron & Getbig, I've had so much fun
Re: Liverpool lost because.....
« Reply #10 on: May 24, 2007, 06:10:37 AM »
Not the best of finals, impotent in front of the goal

my point exactatimissimo.
xL

Your MAAAAaaaa

  • Time Out
  • Getbig IV
  • *
  • Posts: 1402
  • GETBIGS MINISTER OF SEXUAL HEALTH
Re: Liverpool lost because.....
« Reply #11 on: May 24, 2007, 11:11:33 AM »
Sissoko wasn't playing  ::) ::) ::) ::)

Liverpool dominated the game, did you watch it darling?


Sissoko was replaced by Mascherano and he did an excellent job.


Stop trying to sound clever because you don't know how to do a proper analysis.


ta ta nerd
Pm me for STI advice @ NO COST

Saxon

  • Getbig IV
  • ****
  • Posts: 1751
  • Heavy Metal Thunder
Re: Liverpool lost because.....
« Reply #12 on: May 24, 2007, 12:03:30 PM »
Liverpool lost because they were not clinical enough in the final third of the pitch. They were the better team for most of the game.

noc

  • Getbig IV
  • ****
  • Posts: 1429
Re: Liverpool lost because.....
« Reply #13 on: May 24, 2007, 12:27:37 PM »

That American investment will be fun to watch.

yeh these pair of cowboys look like they are going to spend big and said something like mid 70k stadium

the ref needed specs.  in the first half he's letting them score hand ball and allowing fouls and they (the opposition, the white shirty ones, they didn't even take their shirts off at the end ones), kept fouling us and then falling over.

sillyness.  i'm convinced someone paid someone.  not our goalie, but wtf was that?

we was robbed.
no worries, i laughed.  I'll sing and dance again next year...

milan shouldn't of even been in the competition cvnts at uefa got no bottle, shithouse corrupt italians

J. Chimpo

  • Getbig II
  • **
  • Posts: 76
Re: Liverpool lost because.....
« Reply #14 on: May 24, 2007, 01:53:16 PM »
Liverpool wasn't robbed you were lucky that the linesmen called a incorrect offside on Kaka, the final score would have been 3-1 so you got the linesmen in your pockets
You made it sound like Liverpool are the better side and thats must be a joke, if your cheating captain Gerrard hadn't dive in 2005 you wouldn't won that either

nzmusclemonster

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 13693
  • Serenity Now!
Re: Liverpool lost because.....
« Reply #15 on: May 24, 2007, 01:56:26 PM »
Liverpool wasn't robbed you were lucky that the linesmen called a incorrect offside on Kaka, the final score would have been 3-1 so you got the linesmen in your pockets
You made it sound like Liverpool are the better side and thats must be a joke, if your cheating captain Gerrard hadn't dive in 2005 you wouldn't won that either

I'm surprised there wasn't more made of that shitty call.... that was an easy goal and all that went by without much constination ???
P

J. Chimpo

  • Getbig II
  • **
  • Posts: 76
Re: Liverpool lost because.....
« Reply #16 on: May 24, 2007, 02:45:10 PM »
I'm surprised there wasn't more made of that shitty call.... that was an easy goal and all that went by without much constination ???
I understand what you mean but it wouldn't have change anything, the ref/linesmen makes misstakes sometimes

Faust

  • Getbig IV
  • ****
  • Posts: 3154
  • It's a league game, Smokey
Re: Liverpool lost because.....
« Reply #17 on: May 25, 2007, 12:22:02 PM »
Gerrard looked tired an uninspired.

Kuyt is a worker, but not a superstriker. I don't really like this team.
Zenden and Kewell sucked.


Boring final. I was even more disappointed by Milan. Seedorf/Kaka were bleak.
$