|
MattT
|
 |
« on: May 29, 2007, 02:19:42 AM » |
|
He should have taken branch's 4th place spot.
|
|
|
|
|
MikeThaMachine
|
|
« Reply #1 on: May 29, 2007, 02:27:57 AM » |
|
He should have taken branch's 4th place spot.
His conditioning looks good but he looks like he's holding a layer of water... |
I
|
|
|
|
LatsMcGee
|
|
« Reply #2 on: May 29, 2007, 02:50:25 AM » |
|
Post comparison shots please. K thks.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Hurricane Beef !
|
|
« Reply #3 on: May 29, 2007, 02:56:49 AM » |
|
Good call Matt, that dude is fantastic. Any back shots?
The Beef
|
m
|
|
|
|
MattT
|
|
« Reply #4 on: May 29, 2007, 02:57:31 AM » |
|
At first when I scrolled down, I thought it was Shawn Ray! Looks great, who is this guy? More pics?
He's been competing for awhile now. I personally like Craig, cause i feel have the same type of structure as he does. If i work hard enough in the next 5 years i would like to get to that size if possible. |
|
|
|
|
MattT
|
|
« Reply #5 on: May 29, 2007, 02:59:06 AM » |
|
Good call Matt, that dude is fantastic. Any back shots?
The Beef
|
|
|
|
|
MattT
|
|
« Reply #6 on: May 29, 2007, 03:13:44 AM » |
|
.
I know once Craig gets his conditioning on point, he will be like Kai green and come outta nowhere. And he's killin yates in the front shot  |
|
|
|
|
Moen
|
|
« Reply #7 on: May 29, 2007, 03:13:56 AM » |
|
His shape is nice
Conditioning could be a lot better though
He should work with disgusted
|
|
|
|
|
|
MikeThaMachine
|
|
« Reply #8 on: May 29, 2007, 03:16:11 AM » |
|
I know once Craig gets his conditioning on point, he will be like Kai green and come outta nowhere. And he's killin yates in the front shot To bad in real life Yates is taller and about 30+lbs heavier... |
I
|
|
|
|
MattT
|
|
« Reply #9 on: May 29, 2007, 03:18:33 AM » |
|
He is taller? I thought this dude was taller, If you can scale it properly it would be much appreciated.
Craig is 5'6 |
|
|
|
|
MikeThaMachine
|
|
« Reply #10 on: May 29, 2007, 03:24:25 AM » |
|
Craig is 5'6
I thought he was 5'7" but I wouldn't be surprised if he was 5'6 1/2"  |
I
|
|
|
|
phyxsius
|
|
« Reply #11 on: May 29, 2007, 03:43:25 AM » |
|
He's been competing for awhile now. I personally like Craig, cause i feel have the same type of structure as he does. If i work hard enough in the next 5 years i would like to get to that size if possible.
Does that mean you have to start taking juices? |
I am a mini beast
|
|
|
asani
Getbig II
Posts: 116
Getbig!
|
|
« Reply #12 on: May 29, 2007, 03:48:50 AM » |
|
craig was holding to much water! he´s an aswome bb with great lines! His chest and his legs are one of the best today- he only lacks in trizeps- and backdevelopment
|
|
|
|
|
Matt C
|
|
« Reply #13 on: May 29, 2007, 04:46:06 AM » |
|
Are you guys sure Craig isn't 5'9? Next to Victor Martinez, he looks around the same height. I root for the 5'9 bodybuilders. Craig is also honest about his weight, only claiming to be 215 - at least back in 2004. Not sure about current claims, but I was surprised that he was claiming 215 when Dexter was claiming 235 and did not look any bigger than Craig (and is shorter, if anything). |
Bodybuilding Pro.com
|
|
|
|
texasbubba
|
|
« Reply #14 on: May 29, 2007, 05:59:47 AM » |
|
He should have taken branch's 4th place spot.
Soft, not much seperation in his legs. |
|
|
|
|
|
njflex
|
|
« Reply #15 on: May 29, 2007, 06:09:28 AM » |
|
Craig is 5'6
he is a very good bber and has been for yrs,u should have saw him as a teen here in jersey,matt your good,but he would have beat ur current self as a teen,and his nationals body was great too ,that's maybe where u can compare to,not his current look. |
$
|
|
|
|
donrhummy
|
|
« Reply #16 on: May 29, 2007, 07:17:27 AM » |
|
Agreed but Miller should have been behind Branch. Wolf winning, Miller being as high up as he was and beating Kai yet Kai beating Branch just shows that there are NO rules/criteria for judging these days. The judges place guys wherever the hell they please. It's stupid. Sure, Wolf should have won but that's probably not why he won. The placements show no consistency at all in criteria. The IFBB is in danger of becoming like the WWE.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Hedgehog
|
|
« Reply #17 on: May 29, 2007, 07:20:06 AM » |
|
Are you guys sure Craig isn't 5'9? Next to Victor Martinez, he looks around the same height. I root for the 5'9 bodybuilders. Craig is also honest about his weight, only claiming to be 215 - at least back in 2004. Not sure about current claims, but I was surprised that he was claiming 215 when Dexter was claiming 235 and did not look any bigger than Craig (and is shorter, if anything). How tall are you? I heard people under 5' 9'' 1/16 were considered short. People above that height, were considered tall... -Hedge |
As empty as paradise
|
|
|
|
donrhummy
|
|
« Reply #18 on: May 29, 2007, 09:08:37 AM » |
|
He's been competing for awhile now. I personally like Craig, cause i feel have the same type of structure as he does. If i work hard enough in the next 5 years i would like to get to that size if possible.
Yes! This would not be a getbig thread if someone didn't post a picture of themself when it wasn't asked for and had NOTHING to do with the thread. Go GetBig! |
|
|
|
|
Chick
The Pros
Getbig V
Gender: 
Posts: 12958
sometimes you get the elevator, somtimes the shaft
|
|
« Reply #19 on: May 29, 2007, 09:33:41 AM » |
|
Agreed but Miller should have been behind Branch. Wolf winning, Miller being as high up as he was and beating Kai yet Kai beating Branch just shows that there are NO rules/criteria for judging these days. The judges place guys wherever the hell they please. It's stupid. Sure, Wolf should have won but that's probably not why he won. The placements show no consistency at all in criteria. The IFBB is in danger of becoming like the WWE.
The placements show clearly that they are judging on what they're looking at...THAT DAY. Different day, different lighting, different judges, different conditioning.....differe nt results. |
|
|
|
|
|
MattT
|
|
« Reply #20 on: May 29, 2007, 12:48:47 PM » |
|
he is a very good bber and has been for yrs,u should have saw him as a teen here in jersey,matt your good,but he would have beat ur current self as a teen,and his nationals body was great too ,that's maybe where u can compare to,not his current look.
No i wasn't saying that i campare to him now!, im just saying structure wise we have simlar builds, and if i was able to pack on a ton of muscle, i would hope that i would end up looking like that. |
|
|
|
|
donrhummy
|
|
« Reply #21 on: May 29, 2007, 12:55:06 PM » |
|
The placements show clearly that they are judging on what they're looking at...THAT DAY.
Different day, different lighting, different judges, different conditioning.....differe nt results.
I'm not arguing against the diff. results from show to show, I have no problem with that. What i'm referring to is the physiques these men had that day - Miller's weaknesses, lack of symmetry, etc were worse than Branch's THAT DAY. Very poor symmetry (biceps off, pecs off, lats off), so-so proportion and a wide waist/oblique section. Also, bad posing but that's not judged anymore. And I know it's not judged, but his gyno is bad as well.  And his abck wasn't any better than branch's, (only slightly better in terms of conditioning).  And that's not even including Craig Richardson in the discussion. |
|
|
|
|
|
blinky
|
|
« Reply #22 on: June 01, 2007, 05:08:02 PM » |
|
wow richardson has REALLY improved. i remember seeing pics when he turned pro. it looks like hes gotten huge since then. great build
|
4
|
|
|
|
