Author Topic: Freaks of NATURE or freaks of SCIENCE?  (Read 7628 times)

SS

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 9610
  • The new and improved SS.
Re: Freaks of NATURE or freaks of SCIENCE?
« Reply #25 on: July 25, 2007, 07:36:53 AM »
oh brother here we go again with these pencil neck geeks, that couldn't fill out a medium shirt ::)

RagingBull

  • Getbig IV
  • ****
  • Posts: 1340
Re: Freaks of NATURE or freaks of SCIENCE?
« Reply #26 on: July 25, 2007, 07:45:09 AM »
This guy just works out a lot...and has self-respect...

Try it sometime....

BTW, Squad, EVERY TIME I post this pic, you run off.  Please stay dialed in on this thread.  Let me run you into the GROUND.  Please?

"Just works out?"  You obviously use "other" means to achieve your size/conditioning as you do not even look like a marathon runner in the photo taken at the aquarium.

nycbull

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 5763
  • Team Jay Should Have Won
Re: Freaks of NATURE or freaks of SCIENCE?
« Reply #27 on: July 25, 2007, 08:05:53 AM »
This guy just works out a lot...and has self-respect...

Try it sometime....

BTW, Squad, EVERY TIME I post this pic, you run off.  Please stay dialed in on this thread.  Let me run you into the GROUND.  Please?


monster indoor outdoor carpet.

chester_bbb

  • Time Out
  • Getbig III
  • *
  • Posts: 973
  • #1 Shawn Ray fan!
Re: Freaks of NATURE or freaks of SCIENCE?
« Reply #28 on: July 25, 2007, 08:15:25 AM »
this guy is a freak of nature, look at those huge arms!!! :o

He got those crazy eyes. :o

The Squadfather

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 25840
Re: Freaks of NATURE or freaks of SCIENCE?
« Reply #29 on: July 25, 2007, 08:17:22 AM »
He got those crazy eyes. :o
hahahaha, he had to pop 15 ephedrine capsules to deal with all of his "womans" black bruthas when he takes her back to da hood.

rockyfortune

  • Getbig IV
  • ****
  • Posts: 1939
  • "look, it's the drunk piano player."
Re: Freaks of NATURE or freaks of SCIENCE?
« Reply #30 on: July 25, 2007, 10:49:49 AM »
off the sauce...
footloose and fancy free

Earl1972

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 22041
  • #EarlToo
Re: Freaks of NATURE or freaks of SCIENCE?
« Reply #31 on: July 25, 2007, 12:54:27 PM »
off the sauce...

look at those forearm veins bulging out

you can tell he's shredded 8)

but you guys like to think that your fat makes you more impressive ::)

E
E

The Squadfather

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 25840
Re: Freaks of NATURE or freaks of SCIENCE?
« Reply #32 on: July 25, 2007, 01:19:30 PM »
off the sauce...
epic bug eyes, homosexual size small silk Hollister shirt, 5 inch wrists, 9 inch forearms, 13 inch upper arms, woman's belt, women hip hugger jeans and sweater tied around waist in mid July heat.

Mars

  • Time Out
  • Getbig V
  • *
  • Posts: 27707
Re: Freaks of NATURE or freaks of SCIENCE?
« Reply #33 on: July 25, 2007, 01:34:09 PM »
Good to see he's not one of those insecure pro bodybuilders who needs to be jacked all life at all costs.

TheEgoCrusher

  • Getbig III
  • ***
  • Posts: 759
Re: Freaks of NATURE or freaks of SCIENCE?
« Reply #34 on: July 26, 2007, 10:35:59 PM »
K.L. is far beyond most of you.

rockyfortune

  • Getbig IV
  • ****
  • Posts: 1939
  • "look, it's the drunk piano player."
Re: Freaks of NATURE or freaks of SCIENCE?
« Reply #35 on: July 27, 2007, 05:50:23 AM »
mmmm..far beyone what?

all i see is an ex steroid/drug abusing/ former bodybuilder who is making cheap, cheesy b-movies...that makes him beyone what?
footloose and fancy free