But they didn't. They lost their chance. And even if the khan hadn't died and the Mongols did invade Europe, it is not certain that they would prevail. Recall that the Huns were Turko-Mongolian Turanids just like the mongols of Genghis Khan, and a combined Roman and Visigothic army destroyed tham at Chalon, killing roughly half a million Huns.
As for today, it is impossible to destroy Whites. They are far, far more advanced. Even nuclear weapons are already a fased off technology for them. Whites nowadays can produce lasers capable of melting tanks at 20 miles away, using photon weapons to kill all life in an area without damaging structures and genetically engineering viruses and bacterias that will kill only non-Whites. The reason why Whites don't do this is because of compassion, one of the hallmark traits of White people. All races have raped, conquered and enslaved others, but Whites are the only ones who freed their slaves out of kindness of heart, and gave them equal rights. White people will have to go to space to find rivals capable of challenging them. 
SUCKMYMUSCLE
Why go thru such lengths to kill and or destroy people, seems to go against any religion, specifically a "Western" religion started in the middle east, that many whites and non-whites are a part of, Christianity I'm going to stop rguing with ignorance...
I can see that there is an enormous amount of hatred for Whites here, for whatever reason. I can also see that the humanities departments of universities keep pushing it's PC, revisionist view of history on it's students, evident in "Parker's" diatribes.
Hatred of whites, dude, ignorance is the parent of hatred. It is only thru the seeking of knowledge or truth, and understanding, no matter how painful it is, one can overcome ignorance and hatred. Besides how can I hate what i part of me? A World renowned professor who was in the last Matrix movie, once stated at Howard university, that, "if you prop 'white' up [white people] or you put 'white' down, you are still focusing on 'white', so unconsciously you are using that as a gauge for yourself".
I don't do that, I don't focus that as a gauge for my success or of people of color's success. By the way can you tell me who this prof. is?
Revisionist PC, doesn't make sense. More and more we discover about history, where it be about archeology, paleontology, or sociology. Some longstanding beliefs have been challenged and pr oven wrong. This is not PC revisionist, but merely information evolution, some like you want to hold on to old theories to to prove your superiority, but in reality you're only paper tigers. It's funny that ones who spout off, are usually the one's who know very little, much like the ones who are bench sitters on a team are usually the one's with the biggest gums.
Another example, when it was discovered that Jesus wanted Judas to betray him, there was an outcry from the religious community to not "rewrite the Bible", because people have read for centuries that Judas did, even though it may be wrong now, but they want to hold onto old beliefs.
