Yes. I see what you're saying and I respectfully disagree. Like it or not the left played Americans because they did not want to be seen as weak on national security. Like it really mattered though. In the end they did anyway.
As far as the World Government Court goes, you're right. It has ZERO authority over the United States and I pray to God it never does. The last thing we need is a bunch of socialist third world countries telling the United States how to conduct it's business and how to protect itself from those that would do us harm.
Let's face reality here. Bush will NEVER be impeached and there isn't a damn thing the World Government Court or the radical left can do about it. If the Democrats had an ounce of evidence that would stick and actually impeach Bush they would have done it already. Additionally, it sets a precedent that I really do believe the Democrats do not want to establish.
You make a good point. The democrats simply do not have the ability to stand up to Bush. Here's an example: Funding for the troops for '08 came up. The democrats proposed funding with deadlines for troop withdrawal. Bush vetoed that bill.
So in essence, Bush cut the funding to the troops. Since the democrats do not hold enough seats to override a presidential veto they could stand their ground or propose new legislation. Did the democrats stand pat? No.
They loaded up with pork the bill the president wanted and let it pass.
It could have been a showdown but wasn't. The democrats let down the country by caving into Bush and the republicans.
The way I look at the entire Iraq mess is that the US's occupation will always be viewed with an air of illegitimacy b/c of the way Bush ordered the invasion. That being said, I also think that as long as we have troops occupying the country, they will be attacked. Not a very complex analysis but I think it's true.