|
natural al
|
 |
« on: September 14, 2007, 01:59:26 PM » |
|
since there's still time for people to qualify, this will probably change but here goes
1-Jay 2-Ronnie 3-Vic 4-Dex 5-Melvin 6-Toney Freeman 7-Gustavo 8-Wolf 9-Darrem Charles 10-Ronny Rockel
no big change in the top 5, no gunter either unless he comes in in the kind of shape he was in 2 years ago when he was 4th.
|
nasser=piece of shit
|
|
|
|
adipo8
|
 |
« Reply #1 on: September 15, 2007, 06:23:35 PM » |
|
since there's still time for people to qualify, this will probably change but here goes
1-Jay 2-Ronnie 3-Vic 4-Dex 5-Melvin 6-Toney Freeman 7-Gustavo 8-Wolf 9-Darrem Charles 10-Ronny Rockel
no big change in the top 5, no gunter either unless he comes in in the kind of shape he was in 2 years ago when he was 4th.
show is between - Victor and Toney ,
|
|
|
|
|
Acerimmer1
Getbig II
 
Posts: 239
Getbig!
|
 |
« Reply #2 on: September 16, 2007, 05:07:10 AM » |
|
show is between - Victor and Toney ,
 You are living in cloud cockoo land are you not?
|
|
|
|
|
|
natural al
|
 |
« Reply #3 on: September 18, 2007, 08:32:53 AM » |
|
show is between - Victor and Toney ,
I like toney alot and considering the results of last weekend he might be able to take out melvin but I don't see him beating Vic, Ronnie or Jay. I DO think he's very, very good so dont' jump down my throat I'm just being realistic about his chances IMO. He's a "big" guy with a small tight waist, lots of detail..looks great. He probably COULD beat Ronnie if it was judged the way it should be but the name Ronnie Coleman is to big for him to overcome IMO......same with Jay and everyone wants Vic to do great.
|
nasser=piece of shit
|
|
|
|
genrommel74
|
 |
« Reply #4 on: September 18, 2007, 11:41:30 AM » |
|
1. jay 2. vic 3. ronnie 4. dexter 5. toney 6. wolf 7. gustavo 8. melvin 9. markus 10. rockel
ANd melvin could be even lower after last weekend. Silvio could be in the top ten or darrem
|
|
|
|
|
|
natural al
|
 |
« Reply #5 on: September 18, 2007, 01:20:07 PM » |
|
after looking at pics of Dave henry I might bump him up to 10th and move rockel out of the top 10.
|
nasser=piece of shit
|
|
|
|
Trev
|
 |
« Reply #6 on: September 19, 2007, 04:51:22 AM » |
|
Tip for the posedown  ? Kai Green. On form this dude is GOOD !!!
|
|
|
|
|
gymguy
Getbig III
  
Posts: 759
Getbig!
|
 |
« Reply #7 on: September 19, 2007, 08:11:15 AM » |
|
1. Ronnie 2. Jay 3. Dexter 4. Vic 5. Badel 6. Wolf 7. Melvin 8. Toney 9. Rockel 10. Gunther
|
|
|
|
|
|
adipo8
|
 |
« Reply #8 on: September 19, 2007, 08:14:59 AM » |
|
1. Ronnie 2. Jay 3. Dexter 4. Vic 5. Badel 6. Wolf 7. Melvin 8. Toney 9. Rockel 10. Gunther
8th??
|
|
|
|
|
|
genrommel74
|
 |
« Reply #9 on: September 19, 2007, 09:24:03 AM » |
|
after looking at pics of Dave henry I might bump him up to 10th and move rockel out of the top 10.
David henry is too small for the olympia no matter how good he looks. The olympia has been and always will be the big mans show. Henry is just too small
|
|
|
|
|
|
natural al
|
 |
« Reply #10 on: September 19, 2007, 12:41:40 PM » |
|
David henry is too small for the olympia no matter how good he looks. The olympia has been and always will be the big mans show. Henry is just too small
I think you might be suprised at what is going to go down. I think they are gonna go for the more detailed buys vs. just size. I could be totally wrong. I figure they'll have one "short" guy up there and it's between Dave and Ronny Rockel for best little guy in the IFBB right now. Tip for the posedown  ? Kai Green. On form this dude is GOOD !!! he's not competing...
|
nasser=piece of shit
|
|
|
|
mass 04
|
 |
« Reply #11 on: September 19, 2007, 06:09:33 PM » |
|
1-Ronnie 2-Jay 3-Victor 4-Freeman 5-Melvin 6-Gustavo 7-Wolf 8-Darrem 9-Ruhl 10-Rockell
|
|
|
|
|
|
Charlys69
|
 |
« Reply #12 on: September 20, 2007, 07:04:13 AM » |
|
1. Coleman/Cutler 2. Cutler/Coleman (hard to say....  ) 3. Martinez 4. Dexter Jackson 5. Toney Freeman 6. Markus Rühl 7. Dennis Wolf 8. Gustavo Badell 9. Ronnie Rockel 10. Melvin Anthony
|
|
|
|
|
|
stuntmovie
|
 |
« Reply #13 on: September 20, 2007, 10:00:31 AM » |
|
Since you can't place a bet on the Olympia outcome in Las Vegas, I'm more than willing to compensate and offer a prize of some sort to the winner (as dertemined by Ron only) who is first to guess the Top five in this year's Mr Olympia Contest.
At present here are the prizes that I am willing to offer .....
"Alien vs Predator" (AVP DVD) ...... One of the worst movies I have ever seen. "Two for the Money" which is actually pretty good. Plus email copies of the better photos I take during the Olympia and the Joe Weider Expo.
And I'll add to this as I clean out my closet and deliver them to Ron (US postage included) sometime during the Oly event.
Get all the Top Ten correctly and I'll add a home made cut of my favorites from the original Sugar Hill Gang - supposedly one of the first rap groups in the business and a damn good recording.
All this and possibly more subject to Ron's approval of course.
|
|
|
|
|
|
dragonheart
|
 |
« Reply #14 on: September 20, 2007, 11:33:24 AM » |
|
1. ronnie 2. jay 3. victor 4. tony 5. dexter 6. melvin
dexter needs to really nail it at this show. victor already surpassed him in 2006 in placings, and i suspect tony freeman will also pass him at the O unless hes totally shredded.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Thin Lizzy
|
 |
« Reply #15 on: September 21, 2007, 10:12:38 PM » |
|
1. Jay 2. Dex 3. Ronnie 4. Vic 5. Silvio 6. Wolf 7. Melvin 8. Darrem 9. Gustavo 10. Ronnie R.
|
|
|
|
|
George Stinky Bush
Getbig IV
   
Gender: 
Posts: 1657
Whose down with OPP
|
 |
« Reply #16 on: September 22, 2007, 08:55:42 PM » |
|
2nd for ronnie
|
young hov
|
|
|
|
genrommel74
|
 |
« Reply #17 on: September 23, 2007, 05:50:46 PM » |
|
1. Jay 2. Dex 3. Ronnie 4. Vic 5. Silvio 6. Wolf 7. Melvin 8. Darrem 9. Gustavo 10. Ronnie R.
Where is Tony?
|
|
|
|
|
|
Luv_2build
|
 |
« Reply #18 on: September 24, 2007, 09:08:09 AM » |
|
since there's still time for people to qualify, this will probably change but here goes
1-Jay 2-Ronnie 3-Vic 4-Dex 5-Melvin 6-Toney Freeman 7-Gustavo 8-Wolf 9-Darrem Charles 10-Ronny Rockel
no big change in the top 5, no gunter either unless he comes in in the kind of shape he was in 2 years ago when he was 4th.
Last I heard, Gunter is not competing. has this changed?
|
|
|
|
|
|
natural al
|
 |
« Reply #19 on: September 24, 2007, 12:42:42 PM » |
|
Last I heard, Gunter is not competing. has this changed?
I didn't hear that....he wouldn't be a factor anyway....unless he got back to how he looked 2 years ago.
|
nasser=piece of shit
|
|
|
|
Bear
|
 |
« Reply #20 on: September 24, 2007, 01:28:18 PM » |
|
I like toney alot and considering the results of last weekend he might be able to take out melvin but I don't see him beating Vic, Ronnie or Jay. I DO think he's very, very good so dont' jump down my throat I'm just being realistic about his chances IMO. He's a "big" guy with a small tight waist, lots of detail..looks great. He probably COULD beat Ronnie if it was judged the way it should be but the name Ronnie Coleman is to big for him to overcome IMO......same with Jay and everyone wants Vic to do great.
Yes, plus Toney's thickness is half Ronnie, although many would argue a thin waist is more important.
|
|
|
|
|
gymguy
Getbig III
  
Posts: 759
Getbig!
|
 |
« Reply #21 on: September 24, 2007, 05:47:50 PM » |
|
8th??
Yup. His pec tear is gonna hurt him. I'd love for him to do better, though. His added size could help a lot, if he is hard enough.
|
|
|
|
|
|
genrommel74
|
 |
« Reply #22 on: September 26, 2007, 06:18:06 AM » |
|
I didn't hear that....he wouldn't be a factor anyway....unless he got back to how he looked 2 years ago.
Gunter cant compete he hasnt qualified
|
|
|
|
|
|
natural al
|
 |
« Reply #23 on: September 26, 2007, 08:16:04 AM » |
|
Gunter cant compete he hasnt qualified
sorry, I forgot only the top 6 qualify from the year before now...it used to be top 10 
|
nasser=piece of shit
|
|
|
|
Luv_2build
|
 |
« Reply #24 on: September 26, 2007, 12:54:56 PM » |
|
Gunter cant compete he hasnt qualified
That won't stop him from getting a special invite if he asked for it. just like he has been given in the past
|
|
|
|
|
|