wow, you really are full of shit. Like the "literal translation" means anything different . . . History of zionist oppression against Muslims . . . pick up a neutral history book sometime . . . might do you good.
Yes a literal translation does mean something.
This is a correct translation: "The Imam said this regime occupying Jerusalem must vanish from the page of time."
This is is not a correct translation: "Israel must be wiped off the map!"
Surely a man of your intellect can see the difference? Otherwise what difference do words make to you? You seem to know it all already. Did you read Ahmadinejad's speech?
In Ahmadinejad's speech he refers to Zionism as the West's apparatus for Muslim oppression in the Middle East. You may disagree with the man's reasoning but there is validity to his point. First the US installed the Shah. Then the US paid more foreign aid to Israel than any other country helping them develop one of the world's finest armies. The US always takes the side of Israeli terrorism and never the side of muslim terrorism. That may seem a bit flippant but it is largely correct.
I think the forces that be are playing people for fools and you are wholeheartedly accepting this script written for Iran as true.
Did you also believe the WMD allegations against Iraq? or the Al Qaeda connection? Hell, while we are on the topic, did you think that Saddam Hussein was behind the 9/11 attacks?