im not suprised that ruhl retires. as he says the problem with his chest looks bad and he has had a hard time coming in really ripped also his physqiue has become more and more lumpy.
that being said: when ruhl was at his best from late 90s to 2002-2003 he was better than jay cutler ever has been or will be!
the fact that cutler was given the mr o has destroyed alot for bodybuilding. it is one of the worst decisions in bodybuilding history.
as for ruhls questions if his physique should be 15 placings lower than cutlers...the answer is no, but bodybuilding is just too subjective. at this mr o the guys who were out of top 8 could have basically placed anywere 8-24. ( few should have been in top
..the differences are so small and some guys have so different phsysiques its almost impossible to compare (with a few exceptions).
take a guy like shelestov..in my opinion he could have been top 10.
the mr o is about who you are not how you look. jay wasnt even top 4. ronnie wasnt in top 8.
this extreme subjectivity and rigged contests together make bodybuilding competitions very uninteresting as far as placings go. they can work as a good scene for people to show their physique but the placings are in many cases just based on who you are and thus irrelevant
the mr o 2007 has failed to name the best bodybuilder in the world this year.
the whole RESULST LIST at this mr olympia (2007) is NOT VALID.