Dennis Kucinich's UFO Comments Prove He's Nuts

[Dos Equis]

A woman wrote about it in a book, and mentioned him.  Russert asked him about the quote from the woman.

Should he have lied to the media?  Should he have dodged the Q?  He saw something in the sky that he could not identify.  It's happened to two of our former presidents.  I guess they're nuts too, huh?  Maybe the whole world is nuts except you, huh BB?

   No the world is not nuts.  But you are.  HTH.   

[Hugo Chavez]

What I find more disturbing is that he doesn't eat me!

Is that something you want to happen  

[BabyBallsMcgee]

I think most people probably use the term UFOs to refer to alien spacecraft.  That makes Kucinich a nut.   

He specified it was an UNIDENTIFIED FLYING OBJECT. Your assumptions are far from the truth and you lack evidence to back any of your claims.

[Livewire]

Kucinich is not the first presidential aspirant to report seeing a UFO.

According to numerous media accounts, when Jimmy Carter was governor of Georgia in 1973, he filed a report with the International UFO Bureau in Oklahoma City claiming that he'd seen an unidentified glowing object four years earlier in Leary, Ga. He said later that he did not believe the object to be an alien craft, and some "ufologists," as specialists call themselves, think he saw a halo around the planet Venus.

Ronald Reagan believed he had seen UFOs at least twice -- once on the coast while driving to Hollywood with his wife, Nancy, and once, as governor of California, while flying on a plane near Bakersfield. In "Landslide," their 1988 book about Reagan's second term, journalists Doyle McManus, The Times' Washington bureau chief, and Jane Mayer, now of the New Yorker, wrote that Reagan's staff worked hard to keep the UFO sighting stories under wraps

[Dos Equis]

He specified it was an UNIDENTIFIED FLYING OBJECT. Your assumptions are far from the truth and you lack evidence to back any of your claims.

Yes he did specifically say "unidentified flying object."  Still, I like my assumption.  He does not get the benefit of the doubt. 

What evidence and claims are you talking about?     

[Straw Man]

A woman wrote about it in a book, and mentioned him.  Russert asked him about the quote from the woman.

Should he have lied to the media?  Should he have dodged the Q?   He saw something in the sky that he could not identify.  It's happened to two of our former presidents.  I guess they're nuts too, huh?  Maybe the whole world is nuts except you, huh BB?

  No the world is not nuts.  But you are.  HTH.  

How about responding to the question

Should he have lied  or dodged the question (like you're doing?)

What's so shameful about admitting that he witnessed something that he can't explain?   

There are literally hundreds of credible witnesses, including military and commericial pilots, astronauts, etc... who have witnessed things that they cannot explain.

You can find lot's of them here:  http://www.disclosureproject.org/

[Dos Equis]

How about responding to the question

Should he have lied  or dodged the question (like you're doing?)

What's so shameful about admitting that he witnessed something that he can't explain?   

There are literally hundreds of credible witnesses, including military and commericial pilots, astronauts, etc... who have witnessed things that they cannot explain.

You can find lot's of them here:  http://www.disclosureproject.org/

How about I don't feel like responding to the question?  Does that bother you? 

I'm sure there are hundreds of "credible witnesses" who have seen things they cannot explain.  Big deal.  I doubt there is any "credible witness" who has seen an alien spaceship, or Big Foot, or the Loch Ness Monster, etc., etc. 

[Straw Man]

How about I don't feel like responding to the question?  Does that bother you? 

I'm sure there are hundreds of "credible witnesses" who have seen things they cannot explain.  Big deal.  I doubt there is any "credible witness" who has seen an alien spaceship, or Big Foot, or the Loch Ness Monster, etc., etc. 

If you doubt there are credible witnesses to unidentified aerial phenomena then you've either never looked at the evidence or you're just really really stupid ..... or worst case - BOTH

For the record Kucinich did not say he saw an alien spacecraft

You're the one who said it and then ridiculed him for YOUR WORDS.

Given the fact that you have a "personal relationship" with a figment of your imagination you're the last person that should be making fun of anyone for anything

[Dos Equis]

If you doubt there are credible witnesses to unidentified aerial phenomena then you've either never looked at the evidence or you're just really really stupid ..... or worst case - BOTH

For the record Kucinich did not say he saw an alien spacecraft

You're the one who said it and then ridiculed him for YOUR WORDS.

Given the fact that you have a "personal relationship" with a figment of your imagination you're the last person that should be making fun of anyone for anything

Back for your monthly flogging? 

Have you been smoking today Forrest Gump?  I said "I doubt there is any 'credible witness' who has seen an alien spaceship, or Big Foot, or the Loch Ness Monster, etc., etc."  Did you miss that part?  Are you in a smoke-filled room?  Is this the day you periodically smoke marijuana?   

I will continue to ridicule Kucinich.  It's so easy to do.    

[Straw Man]

Back for your monthly flogging? 

Have you been smoking today Forrest Gump?  I said "I doubt there is any 'credible witness' who has seen an alien spaceship, or Big Foot, or the Loch Ness Monster, etc., etc."  Did you miss that part?  Are you in a smoke-filled room?  Is this the day you periodically smoke marijuana?   

I will continue to ridicule Kucinich.  It's so easy to do.    

This has been explained to you by others so I doubt you'll understand it this time

Unidentified means UNIDENTIFIED

What you've done is decide to Indentify it as ALIEN SPACE CRAFT and then decided that that conclusion is ridiculous and worthy of your ridicule.

When called on this you avoided direct debate on the topic at hand and personally attacked the messenger.

It would be interesting if some day you would grow up and engage in an actual dialogue rather than acting like a little pussy and constantly running away rather than having to explain and defend your own statements.

[240 is Back]

You're the one who said it and then ridiculed him for YOUR WORDS.

You nailed it perfectly.

The best part was this line:

How about I don't feel like responding to the question? 

In a thread that HE started to attack someone using lies, he doesn't want to answer the questions we have.  Classic getbig self-pwnage right there.

[Dos Equis]

This has been explained to you by others so I doubt you'll understand it this time

Unidentified means UNIDENTIFIED

What you've done is decide to Indentify it as ALIEN SPACE CRAFT and then decided that that conclusion is ridiculous and worthy of your ridicule.

When called on this you avoided direct debate on the topic at hand and personally attacked the messenger.

It would be interesting if some day you would grow up and engage in an actual dialogue rather than acting like a little pussy and constantly running away rather than having to explain and defend your own statements.

Aw.  He's getting frustrated again.    

Just to clarify, I posted a story by someone else who called Kucinich nuts and agreed with that assessment.  I understand that people who smoke marijuana can have problems concentrating and/or following discussions.  Why don't you check back in when you've come down off your high and it might be a tad clearer. 

[Straw Man]

Aw.  He's getting frustrated again.    

Just to clarify, I posted a story by someone else who called Kucinich nuts and agreed with that assessment.  I understand that people who smoke marijuana can have problems concentrating and/or following discussions.  Why don't you check back in when you've come down off your high and it might be a tad clearer. 

Bum,

1.  It's perfecty reasonable to get frustrated with someone who constantly dodges questions and is incapable of defending or explaining their own position.   It kind of defeats the purpose of a DISCUSSION BOARD

2.  What does smoking pot have to do with THIS TOPIC?

3.  Why would someone who has admitted they can't understand elementary school math (YOU in case you've forgotten) think they should be taken seriously in a conversation among adults?

[240 is Back]

Bum,

1.  It's perfecty reasonable to get frustrated with someone who constantly dodges questions and is incapable of defending or explaining their own position.   It kind of defeats the purpose of a DISCUSSION BOARD

2.  What does smoking pot have to do with THIS TOPIC?

3.  Why would someone who has admitted they can't understand elementary school math (YOU in case you've forgotten) think they should be taken seriously in a conversation among adults?

Very strange that a great board like "Politics" should have to suffer from poor leadership.  This 'beach bum' character represents the far-right republican mindset here on GetBig. 

[Dos Equis]

Bum,

1.  It's perfecty reasonable to get frustrated with someone who constantly dodges questions and is incapable of defending or explaining their own position.   It kind of defeats the purpose of a DISCUSSION BOARD

2.  What does smoking pot have to do with THIS TOPIC?

3.  Why would someone who has admitted they can't understand elementary school math (YOU in case you've forgotten) think they should be taken seriously in a conversation among adults?

1.  No it isn't.  This isn't real life.  This is entertainment, some fun, some good discussion, some flaming, etc.  I find it absolutely hilarious how worked up people like you get over a message board.

2.  You are having trouble following the discussion, so I assume that is related to the fact you smoke marijuana.  I could be wrong.  But I doubt it.  

3.  Me and math don't get along.  There is a reason why I didn't go to engineering school.  I just hire people to do it for me.    I'm also a terrible speller, can't dance, can't sing . . . for whatever that's worth.  

[Straw Man]

Very strange that a great board like "Politics" should have to suffer from poor leadership.  This 'beach bum' character represents the far-right republican mindset here on GetBig. 

I have no problem with any mindset as long as that person is capable of engaging in actual dialogue about their own statements or beliefs

Bum has proven time after time that when challenged on something he has said that he either dodges the question, rolls his eyes or engages in a personal attack

He would literally be laughed off a middle school debate team with the shit he pulls on this site

[240 is Back]

2.  You are having trouble following the discussion

He writes this after attempting multiple times to change the subject, then saying he didn't want to answer the question.  Then, he decides to use yet another personal attack:

so I assume that is related to the fact you smoke marijuana.  I could be wrong.  But I doubt it. 

[Straw Man]

1.  No it isn't.  This isn't real life.  This is entertainment, some fun, some good discussion, some flaming, etc.  I find it absolutely hilarious how worked up people like you get over a message board.

2.  You are having trouble following the discussion, so I assume that is related to the fact you smoke marijuana.  I could be wrong.  But I doubt it.  

3.  Me and math don't get along.  There is a reason why I didn't go to engineering school.  I just hire people to do it for me.    I'm also a terrible speller, can't dance, can't sing . . . for whatever that's worth.  

Ok to summarize - you admit you're not that bright (not big news to anyone here) and you're mostly here to waste time - yours and other people

Fair enough - thanks for making that clear

[Dos Equis]

Ok to summarize - you admit you're not that bright (not big news to anyone here) and you're mostly here to waste time - yours and other people

Fair enough - thanks for making that clear

No problem mang.     I'm just an average Joe.  I've always admitted that.  I'm mostly here for entertainment not necessarily to waste time, although exchanges with you are borderline time wasters.  People who work hard, like many of the people who post here, don't necessarily want to come here for "heavy thinking," but that does happen on occasion.  I find it very entertaining.  Some folks with whacked priorities try and make it more important than it really is.  But that's their problem.  I'm having a good time.   

Glad I could help. 

[Straw Man]

I'm just an average Joe.  I've always admitted that. 

Don't kid yourself - you're well below the average Joe and you know it.

[Dos Equis]

Don't kid yourself - you're well below the average Joe and you know it.

lol.  Ooh you got me.  I'm right at the Mendoza line.  But one thing I know is I'm quite comfortable in my skin and I don't let nameless internet dummies dictate my emotions, how I feel, etc.  You should take note.  Repeat after me:  this is only a message board.     

[BabyBallsMcgee]

Yes he did specifically say "unidentified flying object."  Still, I like my assumption.  He does not get the benefit of the doubt. 

What evidence and claims are you talking about?     

http://youtube.com/watch?v=gSRWRbuMqyc
So you assume what you want even when faced with evidence? You must be a neo con. Do you believe evolution is myth?

[Mad Nickels]

I'm only half joking about Kucinich. 

Even if he is as sane as the rest of us, he's not very smart. 

Dennis Kucinich has a MA in Speech & Communications.

I'm a republican, but you're just putting bad info out there.   He has odd ideas, and he's quirky, but he's smart.

[Dos Equis]

So you assume what you want even when faced with evidence? You must be a neo con. Do you believe evolution is myth?

What's the evidence?  His statement that he saw a UFO?  The clip says it was spacecraft that hovered over the ground.  It was a moving experience.  lol.

He said he saw a UFO.  I assume he believed that UFO was an alien spacecraft. 

lol . . . I'm sorry.  I can't even type this with a straight face.   

“What a maroon.”  B. Bunny

[Straw Man]

lol.  Ooh you got me.  I'm right at the Mendoza line.  But one thing I know is I'm quite comfortable in my skin and I don't let nameless internet dummies dictate my emotions, how I feel, etc.  You should take note.  Repeat after me:  this is only a message board.     

Bum - you're a self proclaimed dimwit.   Why would you think I would care about your opinion about anything?

All this conversation proves is that it's pointless to treat you like an adult and engage you in any kind of dialogue