The mythical founding of Rome in 753 BCE is a mythical date and we have apart from Livy little evidence to suggest that this date is accurate and even for the majority of that time there was no empire but merely a city-state. In any event your 15 centuries claim was way off the mark.
God, you're dense. Let's see...the site of Rome has been inhabited since pre-history, and the city was probably founded by the Etruscans and not the Latin king from Alba Longa called Romulus. Nevertheless, since we don't know when the first huts were built in the site of Rome, the date of 753 B.C is thge best we have. The Romans themselves regarded this as a probable date, so I will accept it.
SUCKMYHISTORY!
Stop saying that because it only makes you look stupid, considering that I know more history than you do and everyone except your biased German frined, DonkeyCunt, can see that.
Again, HUNS were Asians not Germanic Peoples!
Huns were Asiatics who interbred with the Germanics tribes when Attila invaded modern Germany. Go to East Germany and you'll see lots of people with the epicantic fold under their eyes. The last time I checked, that is not a Caucasian trait.
I
never claimed the Huns were a germanic tribe, you moron.
SUCKMYANTHROPOLOGY!
Owned.
SUCKMYMUSCLE