moron...
Just as I suspected, a series of ad hominem attacks and no rebuttals to the comments I pointed out, as usual. I find that the higher the IQ of the member, the less likely they are to be offended by my posts. True story!
Sorry if I offended your delicate sensibility with facts.
Here are some more:
http://userwww.service.emory.edu/~afranc5/Economics_of_Sexuality.pdfPage 39.
The per-contact probability of HIV transmission is 0.02% for vaginal insertive sex.
This means I would have to have sex with 5000 women with HIV before the odds of me getting it strike, or have sex with one woman with HIV 5000 times.
WITH HIV! LOL. And there is propaganda targeted towards my demographic? How mathematically sound is that propaganda?
Compare that to anal-receptive sex where the odds are 0.8%, or one in 125 (40 times the risk). Now let's also use some common sense other than strict science and point out that anal sex is more predominant in the gay community in part due to the lack of pregnancy. Also, the overwhelming majority of the 58,000 people today with HIV are homosexual men or drug users. Straight men are a very small part of this picture.
Don't believe me? Not that facts are debatable or anything, but here is another link anyway:
Baeten JM, Richardson BA, Lavreys L, et al. Female-to-male infectivity of HIV-1 among circumcised and uncircumcised Kenyan men. J Infect Dis. 2005;191:546-553.Also, men get HIV more often in Africa due to existence of other diseases and compromised immune systems. The facts above hold for men with healthy immune systems.
I don't see the point of a system where 88% of the propaganda seems aimed at a group which comprises 12% of the disease carrying population in North America.
http://www.whatisaids.com/wwwboard/messages/368.html"But the politically incorrect truth is rarely spoken out loud: The dreaded heterosexual epidemic never happened."
"Female to male transmission is very inefficient, says Dr. Nancy Padian a professor in the department of obstetrics, gynecology and reproductive science at the University of California, San Francisco and the author of a 1996 10 year study of HIV infected heterosexual couples, the nation's longest and largest. She points out that "it's two to three times easier for men to infect women." But even so, if there are no other risk factors involved, the rate at which an infected man will transmit the virus to a woman is one in 1,100 sex acts."All scientific papers I've read on the topic indicate the odds range from 1 in 300 to 1 in 5000 for a male getting HIV from a woman who is infected, and I've read plenty. Very low no matter how you cut it.
Any rebuttals, post them here and I will rip them piece-by-piece with logic and science.
I am concerned about other STDs - mainly bacterial ones like chlamydia and gonorrhea.
And by the way, it's not that I get extremely angry at HIV propaganda, but as a critical thinking person, it is offensive and promotes ignorance to me.
