Author Topic: 2008 ASC - Branch Warren ?????????  (Read 7287 times)

TrueGrit

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 15192
  • Big dude...all the way big dude.
Re: 2008 ASC - Branch Warren ?????????
« Reply #25 on: January 21, 2008, 09:23:47 AM »
Enough already. IS that all you can talk about.  He's not that old.  Stop trying to rip the guy down. Don't be such a hater.

I was just wondering his age. I am not real familiar with who he is.

Not hating.
O

nycbull

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 5763
  • Team Jay Should Have Won
Re: 2008 ASC - Branch Warren ?????????
« Reply #26 on: January 21, 2008, 09:33:08 AM »
amazing that a person can transform their body that much,(first few pics) to where few men have gone, and not get much recognition for it, i.e. money, fame, awards.  30 years ago he would have been considered a God.

Ex Coelis

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 8075
Re: 2008 ASC - Branch Warren ?????????
« Reply #27 on: January 21, 2008, 09:41:06 AM »
amazing that a person can transform their body that much,(first few pics) to where few men have gone, and not get much recognition for it, i.e. money, fame, awards.  30 years ago he would have been considered a God.

pro bbers deserve at least some measure of positive mainstreem celebrity and esteem

BayGBM

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 19434
Re: 2008 ASC - Branch Warren ?????????
« Reply #28 on: January 21, 2008, 10:53:37 AM »
past couple years Branch has enjoyed mixed success

with guys like Freeman, Heath, Wolf, and Silvio coming into their own, are Branch's best days behind him?


And every fair from fair sometime declines...
                          --Shakespeare
                           

joelocal

  • Guest
Re: 2008 ASC - Branch Warren ?????????
« Reply #29 on: January 21, 2008, 10:56:12 AM »
The effects of insulin are amazing.........in a bad way. Branch and Wolf look literally 10-15 years older than they really are :-\

Ex Coelis

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 8075
Re: 2008 ASC - Branch Warren ?????????
« Reply #30 on: January 21, 2008, 11:12:24 AM »
The effects of insulin are amazing.........in a bad way. Branch and Wolf look literally 10-15 years older than they really are :-\

consider their faces are gaunt and drawn in from having extremely low body fat

not everyone is as young and good looking as you, Coach


joelocal

  • Guest
Re: 2008 ASC - Branch Warren ?????????
« Reply #31 on: January 21, 2008, 11:30:45 AM »
consider their faces are gaunt and drawn in from having extremely low body fat

not everyone is as young and good looking as you, Coach



Just trying to point out that there is a direct correlation between insulin sensitivity and advanced aging.

BayGBM

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 19434
Re: 2008 ASC - Branch Warren ?????????
« Reply #32 on: January 21, 2008, 11:33:51 AM »
Just trying to point out that there is a direct correlation between insulin sensitivity and advanced aging.

I think that's a hasty conclusion.  When they are not dieting they look pretty normal/age appropriate.

joelocal

  • Guest
Re: 2008 ASC - Branch Warren ?????????
« Reply #33 on: January 21, 2008, 11:38:59 AM »
I think that's a hasty conclusion.  When they are not dieting they look pretty normal/age appropriate.

Well, you can always compare those guys to the guys of the 80's that would roughly be about the same age.

GigantorX

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 6370
  • GetBig's A-Team is the Light of Truth!
Re: 2008 ASC - Branch Warren ?????????
« Reply #34 on: January 21, 2008, 11:42:10 AM »
Branch Warren won't compete in the Arnold. He suffered life ending injuries in a car crash late last night.

Branch Warren.  RIP. :'(

cht868

  • Getbig III
  • ***
  • Posts: 782
Re: 2008 ASC - Branch Warren ?????????
« Reply #35 on: January 21, 2008, 12:04:03 PM »
branch will be a middle of the pack kind of guy for the next few years, if he finishes top 5 at the ironman and arnold id be very surprised

gordiano

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 17124
  • TEAM "CUTE PENIS", TEAM TRIFLIN' RONNIE COLEMAN
Re: 2008 ASC - Branch Warren ?????????
« Reply #36 on: January 21, 2008, 12:13:26 PM »
I wouldn't say he is finished or his best days are behind him but I will say his best DEALER is finished so it's a little hard to achieve that conditioning/look when his #1 hook-up got pinched.

 It takes time and trust to find a new source. You know?

DAAAAAAAAAYYYYYYYYYYYYYY YUMMMMM! Block dropping the knowledge.....
HAHA, RON.....

GigantorX

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 6370
  • GetBig's A-Team is the Light of Truth!
Re: 2008 ASC - Branch Warren ?????????
« Reply #37 on: January 21, 2008, 12:13:58 PM »
branch will be a middle of the pack kind of guy for the next few years, if he finishes top 5 at the ironman and arnold id be very surprised

Did you not hear the news? Branch Warren is fucking dead, so there will be no "middle of the pack" for him to be mired in!

Branch Warren RIP

Karl Kox

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 6863
  • There's no Kayfabe in the business anymore.
Re: 2008 ASC - Branch Warren ?????????
« Reply #38 on: January 21, 2008, 01:35:23 PM »
I saw him at metroflex around x mass and he was looking fucking huge

Matt C

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 12752
  • The White Vince Goodrum
Re: 2008 ASC - Branch Warren ?????????
« Reply #39 on: January 21, 2008, 02:03:49 PM »
Enough already. IS that all you can talk about.  He's not that old.  Stop trying to rip the guy down. Don't be such a hater.

Hi Branch.
Bodybuilding Pro.com

Noel Fuller

  • Getbig IV
  • ****
  • Posts: 1366
Re: 2008 ASC - Branch Warren ?????????
« Reply #40 on: January 21, 2008, 05:49:42 PM »
Branch will remain a good top ten pro. His lat is not detached at all. He's got too big for my liking, but the judges will still place him high(ish)
  are you frigging blind???????   go look at any of his front double bi poses from last year...that lat is obliterated.