New Nasser article - 02-08-08

[bigbobs]

 I am talking about Coleman circa 2003 Olympia. Nasser at his biggest competition weight was 280 lbs. Ronnie in 2003 was close to 290 lbs and with smaller bones. Conclusion: he carried far more muscle mass.

Wrong.  Nasser competed at 298 lbs at an English Euro Grand Prix Tour.  He also competed at 289 at the 99 Arnold Classic.  He competed at 285ish a number of times.

I think Ronnie competed at 296 in one Olympia, and 287 in his second highest bodyweight.

[bigbobs]

delusional

Why, do you think Ronnie is so big here that he would "dwarf" Nasser? 

[WhiteCastle]

Brutal self-ownage by WhiteCastle by showing low interpretation skills.  Nowhere in the post you quoted did Nasser show that he cares what people say about him.

Different angle.

Just do a search for "boards" in the article...he's not referring to surf boards.  The whole article is just a Nasser meltdown.

[knny187]

Why, do you think Ronnie is so big here that he would "dwarf" Nasser? 

Damn...Ronnie off the juice (like in that picture) still would dwarf Nasser

[bigbobs]

Damn...Ronnie off the juice (like in that picture) still would dwarf Nasser

"Off the juice??"  Are you trying to insult Ronnie by saying he's not huge??  That pic is in July/2005 just before he started his prep for the 2005 Mr. Olympia, in other words, he was at the end of his offseason/bulking stage for that year.

[CigaretteMan]

Wrong.  Nasser competed at 298 lbs at an English Euro Grand Prix Tour.  He also competed at 289 at the 99 Arnold Classic.  

  Huh..I will have to see written evidence for that. But you're right that he did come to some contests at 285 lbs. In any case, Ronnie would still be carrying more muscle because he was 287 lbs for the 2003 Olympia woh smaller bones.

He competed at 285ish a number of times.

  Ya, but that still would mean he would be carrying less mass than Coleman, because the latter has smaller bones.

I think Ronnie competed at 296 in one Olympia, and 287 in his second highest bodyweight.

  Yes, and if Nasser did indeed compete at 298 lbs, it would mean that he would be carrying less mass than Coleman at the 2004 Olympia due to the bone size difference.

[bigbobs]

Here you go: http://www.bodybuildingpro.com/ronnie-coleman-july-23-2005/

[bigbobs]

  Huh..I will have to see written evidence for that. But you're right that he did come to some contests at 285 lbs. In any case, Ronnie would still be carrying more muscle because he was 287 lbs for the 2003 Olympia woh smaller bones.

  Ya, but that still would mean he would be carrying less mass than Coleman, because the latter has smaller bones.

  Yes, and if Nasser did indeed compete at 298 lbs, it would mean that he would be carrying less mass than Coleman at the 2004 Olympia due to the bone size difference.

My point isnt to get into the nitty-gritty of who has one or two lbs more mass than the other - what I said was that Ronnie does not "dwarf" Nasser AND that they look pretty comparable in size as I've seen them both.

[knny187]

"Off the juice??"  Are you trying to insult Ronnie by saying he's not huge??  That pic is in July/2005 just before he started his prep for the 2005 Mr. Olympia, in other words, he was at the end of his offseason/bulking stage for that year.

Ronnie was not in full motion in that picture...not even close

[Camel Jockey]

Wrong.  Nasser competed at 298 lbs at an English Euro Grand Prix Tour.  He also competed at 289 at the 99 Arnold Classic.  He competed at 285ish a number of times.

I think Ronnie competed at 296 in one Olympia, and 287 in his second highest bodyweight.

Ronnie was 287lbs in the 2003 Mr. Olympia, and 296 lbs in 2004 Mr. Olympia.

Nasser being the pioneer that he was set the stage for so many.

[bigbobs]

Ronnie was not in full motion in that picture...not even close

Yes he was.  Why would he be in anything but "full motion" at the start of his Olympia prep?!  He takes some months off after the Olympia, and then has a hardcore offseason immediately followed by precontest.  That pic was taken at the end of his offseason for 2005.  I also put a link up with other pics taken at that session.

The promoter purposely booked that time since it was a given that Ronnie would be at his biggest.

[knny187]

Yes he was.  Why would he be in anything but "full motion" at the start of his Olympia prep?!  He takes some months off after the Olympia, and then has a hardcore offseason immediately followed by precontest.  That pic was taken at the end of his offseason for 2005.  I also put a link up with other pics taken at that session.

The promoter purposely booked that time since it was a given that Ronnie would be at his biggest.

Cuz Big Bubba just isn't dipshit

[Mcmuscle]

I think 1996 and 1997 Nasser could hold his own against Ronnie.

And let's not forget that Nasser spanked Ronnie for most of the 90's until 1998 when Ronnie took off.

Vince Taylor is the man!

[bigbobs]

  Yes, and if Nasser did indeed compete at 298 lbs, it would mean that he would be carrying less mass than Coleman at the 2004 Olympia due to the bone size difference.

The biggest difference in the most tiny skeletal bone structure compared to the biggst ever is less than 6 (six) LBS!!!  So the discussion of bones making a difference is just BS.
 
Is that also the reason why Ronnie has small weak calves?  And if this is the case how can you criticize Nasser for being "bigger" boned?  So when Nasser's frame is bigger than Ronnies - why is this bad - it's like saying Dennis Wolfs frame is bigger than Cutlers so Wolf should never defeat Cutler?!

[onlyme]

Here is Nasser going fishing with some of the gang.

[Camel Jockey]

Thanks for picture, onlyme. 

[bigguns23]

Here is Nasser going fishing with some of the gang.

Awsome injection spot.

[dearth]

Awsome injection spot.

team undies will tell you thats a mosquito bite or be sting...
nasser is way to clever to inject oil into his delts, wait a minute he did...

[bigbobs]

team undies will tell you thats a mosquito bite or be sting...
nasser is way to clever to inject oil into his delts, wait a minute he did...

So you can tell by an injection site whether there is "synthol" or anabolic steroids that were injected?    Are you saying no other pros have ever had a visible injection scab?

[Lamplighterx]

bigbobs you were looking pretty good next to the big nasty

[dearth]

So you can tell by an injection site whether there is "synthol" or anabolic steroids that were injected?    Are you saying no other pros have ever had a visible injection scab?

so you can tell when a pro has/hasn't injected synthol into his delts based on your epic gay love ?

your stunning objectivity says much about your crediblity

[bigbobs]

bigbobs you were looking pretty good next to the big nasty

Thanks, normally I'm pretty humble but today I took it as a huge compliment that Knny187 thought that Ronnie Coleman was "off drugs" or "not in full motion" from his pic with me!  He did realize that the pics were taken July 23/05 when Ronnie was at the end of his 2005 offseason and fully grown about to start dieting down for the 2005 Olympia!

[bigbobs]

so you can tell when a pro has/hasn't injected synthol into his delts based on your epic gay love ?

your stunning objectivity says much about your crediblity

So we assume every pro injects synthol and if anyone objects to such an assumption it means they are in gay love with the bodybuilder? 

I give benefit of the doubt unless I have reason not to.  No one here is a guru such that they can look at a rear delt and tell whether a lump is due to synthol or scar tissue, or something else.  Besides, Flex Wheeler's rear delt was much more lumpy/pointy than Nasser's was (after Nasser's scar tissue built up by the early 2000's)

[Go 4 It]

Who's ship is that?

[Eric2]