It would be nice for the Pats if it were a possible reality. For now, you'll have stick with old-timers like Bruschi and Zack Thomas.
Where are you getting this information from? Suggs was franchised, a move he absolutely expected to happen. A long term deal wasn't supposed to be in place until after the NFL draft and right before training camp.
Got a link?
Suggs is pissed the Ravens tagged him as a lb, and not a de. I am surprised you didnt know about this considering you work for the ravens - (its all over the place). At this point it's just a rumor, but it could cause some problems if Suggs feels the Ravens are trying to be stingy with him. At this point the ravens are a few years from contending for a sb, and thats if they pick up a legit qb in the dradt. If the ravens are trying to milk Suggs for all he is worth , he may decide to hit the bricks.
http://www.footballoutsiders.com/2008/03/06/extra-points/6178/Terrell Suggs Wants a Bigger Tag
Here’s a very interesting wrinkle in the economics of the 3-4 defense. Baltimore linebacker Terrell Suggs, who was tagged with the Ravens’ franchise tender this year, will earn a guaranteed $8.065 million. But because Suggs lines up as a rush end so often, he’s filed a grievance against the team stating that he should receive the tender for defensive ends, which would bank him a total of $8.879 million.
This is a case that will be watched intently by every outside linebacker in, and every team running, a defense like Baltimore’s or Dallas’ or San Diego’s (Mr. Parcells, this applies to you in Miami as well).
Seems to be a pretty easy solution to me — with all the charting that teams do these days, there has to be specific information as to how many times Suggs lined up with his hand down. If it was half the snaps or more, call him a defensive end who got a two-yard head start on a few zone blitzes and give him the extra money. Seriously, if his primary function is as an end, and you want to take him off the market, that’s how he should be paid. The Ravens counter with the less than completely compelling argument that Suggs is listed on the roster as a linebacker and plays linebacker in the base defense, and that’s how he should be compensated. They may want to work on something better.
Our individual defensive numbers show Suggs involved in 62 rushing plays and 20 pass plays. DeMarcus Ware? 57 to 29. Shawne Merriman? 42 to 29. Outside linebackers in our tables average involvement in about three pass plays for every two run plays, While that includes 4-3 linebackers as well and is therefore not the definitive argument-solver, Suggs’ own high percentage of run plays leads me to believe that he’s a special case.