« previous next »
Pages: 1 2 3 [4]   Go Down

Author Topic: sunken faces 80's/early 90's vs. Present  (Read 14045 times)

NarcissisticDeity

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 79309
  • Go back to making jewelry and cakes with your girl
Re: sunken faces 80's/early 90's vs. Present
« Reply #75 on: May 08, 2008, 02:28:52 PM »
Quote from: bizzy on May 07, 2008, 06:41:51 PM
2001 is yours and quite a few others opinion of his best.
Alot say 2003 was his best showing.
Many believe 99
was his best combo of size, shape and condition.

Same reason people pick 74 Arnold over 75.
Same reason people pick pre contest 93 Dorian over 93 contest Dorian.
Hulkster was on topic with his statement of Ronnie's face.
Let's keep it back on topic ND and not debate which year was someones
best. I believe there is another thread for that.

You say lets keep it on topic while NOT keeping it on topic , don't be a hypocrite and NO the general consensus is 2001 is his best showing NOT 1999 thats you and Hulkster's preference but you people have limited understanding of competitive bodybuilding , but make no mistake the people in the know aren't claiming 1999.

Logged

Meso_z

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 17954
Re: sunken faces 80's/early 90's vs. Present
« Reply #76 on: May 08, 2008, 02:33:23 PM »
Logged

NarcissisticDeity

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 79309
  • Go back to making jewelry and cakes with your girl
Re: sunken faces 80's/early 90's vs. Present
« Reply #77 on: May 08, 2008, 02:37:25 PM »
Quote from: Hulkster on May 07, 2008, 06:59:26 PM

exactly.

every time the cowardly lion grows the balls to post, he shows his ignorance.

he posts pics of Ronnie 2001 as if 99 was not as good LOL

 ::)

ND, you sound like a broken record..

and once again, you have no visual proof, as always ::).

Hulkster when are you due for another meltdown post? and whats the bullshit I'm ' cowardly ' ? I've been posting all along stop act like I'm avoiding posting in here , I don't post on the truce thread because A) I proved my points and you and your buddies couldn't counter them , B) because Ronnie himself said on two occasions that he could NEVER beat Dorian , guess what moron that means I won  ;) , you and the other idiots are lost without me but hey the game is over .

and I post pictures of Ronnie Coleman's best showing which is 2001 Arnold Classic , this is verified by many people , many intelligent knowledgeable people in the professional bodybuilding community ! Ronnie himself said his best Olympia was 1998 and NOT 1999 specifically because his conditioning was spot-on you can't counter this and never could , just like when Ronnie said he could NEVER beat Dorian Yates and when arguably the best bodybuilder ever says this his words carry some weight  ;)

Hulkster as usual you have nothing for me , keep posting your photoshopped pics and brag about how everyone who was actually at the contest and you sitting at home using photoshopped pic is right lol
Logged

Meso_z

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 17954
Re: sunken faces 80's/early 90's vs. Present
« Reply #78 on: May 08, 2008, 02:39:07 PM »
This guy looked awesome too.

Logged

NarcissisticDeity

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 79309
  • Go back to making jewelry and cakes with your girl
Re: sunken faces 80's/early 90's vs. Present
« Reply #79 on: May 08, 2008, 02:44:48 PM »
Quote from: Meso_z on May 08, 2008, 02:39:07 PM
This guy looked awesome too.



Hamdullah's conditioning was always spot on he was always razor sharp but he got lost in the size game .
Logged

pumpster

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 18890
  • If you're reading this you have too much free time
Re: sunken faces 80's/early 90's vs. Present
« Reply #80 on: May 08, 2008, 03:24:02 PM »
Quote from: bizzy on May 07, 2008, 06:41:51 PM
.
Hulkster was on topic with his statement of Ronnie's face.
Let's keep it back on topic ND and not debate which year was someones
best. I believe there is another thread for that.

Narc deity cannot stay on topic, annoying chronic ADD is her middle name. :-*
Logged

NarcissisticDeity

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 79309
  • Go back to making jewelry and cakes with your girl
Re: sunken faces 80's/early 90's vs. Present
« Reply #81 on: May 08, 2008, 03:26:01 PM »
Quote from: pumpster on May 08, 2008, 03:24:02 PM
Narc deity cannot stay on topic, annoying is his/her middle name.

Pot calling the kettle black , bitching about me not staying on topic while NOT staying on topic .

anyway
Logged

pumpster

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 18890
  • If you're reading this you have too much free time
Re: sunken faces 80's/early 90's vs. Present
« Reply #82 on: May 08, 2008, 03:26:43 PM »
Quote from: NarcissisticDeity on May 08, 2008, 03:26:01 PM
Pot calling the kettle black , bitching about me not staying on topic while NOT staying on topic .

anyway

There she goes again.
Logged

NarcissisticDeity

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 79309
  • Go back to making jewelry and cakes with your girl
Re: sunken faces 80's/early 90's vs. Present
« Reply #83 on: May 08, 2008, 03:30:04 PM »
Quote from: pumpster on May 08, 2008, 03:26:43 PM
There she goes again.

could you possibly get anymore childish? has this what you've been reduced to? seriously and stop projecting your lust for transgendered people on me , maybe this post will ring a bell lol  ;)
Logged

BayGBM

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 19434
Re: sunken faces 80's/early 90's vs. Present
« Reply #84 on: May 08, 2008, 03:30:21 PM »
shredded
Logged

TrueGrit

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 15192
  • Big dude...all the way big dude.
Re: sunken faces 80's/early 90's vs. Present
« Reply #85 on: May 08, 2008, 03:45:01 PM »
Quote from: BayGBM on May 08, 2008, 03:30:21 PM
shredded

Bay, out of interest, what does your Gaydar say to you about that guy?
Logged
O

Danimal77

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 7486
  • Yo Adrian
Re: sunken faces 80's/early 90's vs. Present
« Reply #86 on: May 08, 2008, 03:50:00 PM »
Quote from: TrueGrit on May 08, 2008, 03:45:01 PM
Bay, out of interest, what does your Gaydar say to you about that guy?

TrueGrit, out of interest, why would you care about his Gaydar? Do you have one of your own?
Logged

TrueGrit

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 15192
  • Big dude...all the way big dude.
Re: sunken faces 80's/early 90's vs. Present
« Reply #87 on: May 08, 2008, 03:56:00 PM »
Quote from: Danimal77 on May 08, 2008, 03:50:00 PM
TrueGrit, out of interest, why would you care about his Gaydar? Do you have one of your own?

Absolutely. Mine says that guy looks queer..what does yours say?
Logged
O

The Coach

  • Guest
Re: sunken faces 80's/early 90's vs. Present
« Reply #88 on: May 08, 2008, 04:35:52 PM »
 ;D











Logged

BayGBM

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 19434
Re: sunken faces 80's/early 90's vs. Present
« Reply #89 on: May 08, 2008, 05:39:19 PM »
 :)
Logged

YoungBlood

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 6777
  • Weee!
Re: sunken faces 80's/early 90's vs. Present
« Reply #90 on: May 08, 2008, 05:51:15 PM »
Quote from: BayGBM on May 08, 2008, 05:39:19 PM
:)

Man, I remember that guy...for awhile his photo was pasted all over the net about 4 years ago. Guy looks phenomenal alone, but next to someone like, even, Ronnie Rockel, he disappears.
However, when bodybuilding, that's the image I have in my head. :)
Logged

BayGBM

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 19434
Re: sunken faces 80's/early 90's vs. Present
« Reply #91 on: May 09, 2008, 06:40:10 AM »
Quote from: YoungBlood on May 08, 2008, 05:51:15 PM
Man, I remember that guy...for awhile his photo was pasted all over the net about 4 years ago. Guy looks phenomenal alone, but next to someone like, even, Ronnie Rockel, he disappears.
However, when bodybuilding, that's the image I have in my head. :)

 :)

Logged
Pages: 1 2 3 [4]   Go Up
« previous next »