Author Topic: Is this perfection ?  (Read 3143 times)

swilkins1984

  • Getbig IV
  • ****
  • Posts: 3420
Re: Is this perfection ?
« Reply #25 on: June 03, 2008, 07:18:55 PM »
I think Serge was genetically superior to even Arnold.

dogbowl

  • Getbig IV
  • ****
  • Posts: 1012
  • Team anyone except heath
Re: Is this perfection ?
« Reply #26 on: June 03, 2008, 07:20:47 PM »
slightly uneven abs, if you're going to be picky

imo one of the best ever

Cleanest Natural

  • Competitors
  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 28661
  • Diet first, all else second
Re: Is this perfection ?
« Reply #27 on: June 04, 2008, 02:29:38 AM »
He looks very good. However : did anyone noticed the thick ankles ?


RZA

  • Getbig IV
  • ****
  • Posts: 1165
Re: Is this perfection ?
« Reply #28 on: June 04, 2008, 02:50:21 AM »
Why not use Arnold or Zane? Serge could use more balance between upper and lower body. Glaringly apparent. But then, he was a Mr. Olympus, WBBG, that is.

Arnold, balanced? WTF? Serge's lower body was not on par with his upper body, sure. But Arnold comes to mind when one says unbalanced: chicken legs (with good separation), chest and biceps overpowering the rest by far. Zane, I agree. Strange abs on Serge but his upper body is fantastic, shape and muscular quality (quite dense for that period) and his legs were a bit better circa '75.