you're an idiot, so I will break it down for you in simple terms.
The article explains that all available evidence suggests that no more than 20g of protein is necessary only after a workout (which BBers rarely do more than once a day). This is a miniscule amount so it is not necessary to use supplementary protein to obtain it as you will surely get at least this much in a meal of normal foods. Hence protein supplements are unnecessary.
my god you are dim!!!!----first of all you didnt address any of my points, you obviously didnt read my post just as you didnt really read teh article------I acknowledged they were questioning how much protein an athlete needs but the
Dr's also acknowledged their study was fundamentally flawed as it had no controls and also stated “Some studies suggested that adding proteins to carbohydrates during exercise can enhance performance,” Dr. Tarnopolsky said. “Many other studies suggested it didn’t do any good.”
so they are saying that this study is in no way definitive proof as to how much protein an athlete needs and if it increases performance. yet you preach that their findings are the end all be all---which they do not even admit.
the study didnt study different athletes of various sizes etc. DO you really think an athlete that is 260lbs of lean muscle only needs the same paltry 15grams of protein as an athlete that weighs 155lbs
your title of the thread is inherently flawed as the article doesnt address whether or not whey protein works---all they say is an athlete MAY not need as much, but do not say that getting your protein from a supplement is bad. Even Dr. Jeukendrup admits he uses a protein energy drink after working out.
Im through debating you since you have no concept of debate and only repeat yourself and sling insults without reading or understaning my stance and addressing the points theiren.
END POINT-----------the study was not controlled and was flawed on so many levels it holds no scientific merit