that doesn't say much since he hold the world record in the 100m
let him put on the football pads and try to catch pass over the middle against some corner backs and defensive back, $10 bets randy moss is better.
Moss being better on the Football field doesn't say much either, he IS a football player and considered one of the greatest of all time. $10 Bolt is better in his sport (track)
If Bolt tried to go across the middle the same thing would happen if Moss go across the middle, he'd get crushed. Moss doesn't do that, he's the speed guy just like Bolt would be. That's why the Viking had Carter and the pats now have Welker.
Moss advantage is his speed, height and hands. Bolt's the same height, much faster & if his hands are even decent, POTENTIALLY he'd be better that Moss.
exactly, and that's why Moss or any other top level NFL reciever will be in the 100 million dollars earned for their career range and Bolt will have to have a normal full time job to supplement his sprinting.
Receivers don't make that much without endorsement and I doubt Bolt will need a regular job to support his sprinting. With his Puma contract and other endorsements, he'll make as much if not more that any NFL receiver in Europe where track is more popular and most ppl have no idea who Moss, Rice or chad Johnson is.
You can't compare athletes from differnt sport, Jordan was the greatest b'ball player ever, Dion sanders was a great Football player and both tremendous athletes. Jordan couldn't cut it in Baseball and Dion was ok. Either of these guys chose baseball we'd never heard of them. Rugby players wouldn't survive in the NFL (too small) and NFL players wouldn't survive in Rugby (too fast paced)
