If it really was a "liberal" media......
http://www.getbig.com/boards/index.php?topic=228485.0
Why are most jounalists liberal?
http://www.getbig.com/boards/index.php?topic=228537.0
Myth of Liberal Media
http://www.getbig.com/boards/index.php?topic=228416.0
I asked this question b/c I question why people (viewers) still take this "news" & "analysis" as anything real.
To post links from previous discussions on ‘Getbig’ really doesn’t make your point.
These people are paid to be journalists. Give all the information; don’t hide the truth to support an agenda. Question both sides and give them equal time. Not to make implications on what they think the situation may or may not be.
For the entire last six months every news report on the economy always had the word recession in it. We are not nor have we been in a recession.
~ Bad implication
Do you hear of any good news from Iraq? No you don’t. Not from the mains stream media. The Iraqis have met- last time I checked- 16 of the 18 political benchmarks set by us. There is more violence in my home town now than there is in Iraq. That should be the opening story line every time the news comes on. But it isn’t. But if a suicide blows up a goat market, you’ll hear about it.
We, the US, our soldiers, have sacrificed so much, spent billions of dollars freeing that country, you would think the talking heads would discuss the good news from there once in a while.
~ Not giving the information.
A distinguished journalist doesn’t investigate his own story, which was meant to hurt a certain politician, and is completely proven to be a bogus one. That is what you call text book liberalism.
Besides, poll after poll, study after study says that most of the media members are left leaning democrats. A lot of them admit it!
They can affiliate with whatever party they want, but when it seeps through in there reporting is when it crosses a line.
And I don’t see how anyone can watch the news now pertaining to Hussein Obama and not think there is an obvious bias towards the moon-bats.
. The media hasn't entirely given him a pass, but they are not focusing enough on the details of his votes, stances, and historical associations & collegues that are concerning. The democrats should have had the balls to stop the Obama train earlier and gotten a more moderate nominee. Now they may loose the election because more things are coming out about Obama's history...even though its seems like its a struggle to get these things anywhere near the mainstream media.
This guy is not really qualified to be president, nor is he moderate enough. His backround of 'community organizer in South Chicago' is not appropriate for a president.
I could not agree with you more. They haven't given him a complete pass but
when someone is running for the most powerful man in the world I would expect a lot more scrutiny on his past. I think you're right, the dems are nervous that they picked the wrong guy. He's not electable. As much as the media and his loyal band of followers worship him, it would seem he would have a much bigger lead in the polls. Not so. Just goes to show you how out of touch with America the media is. The true heart of this country can see right through Obama's sickening rhetoric.