Author Topic: Palin CANNOT DEFINE the Bush Doctrine  (Read 9866 times)

calmus

  • Getbig IV
  • ****
  • Posts: 3867
  • Time is luck.
Re: Palin CANNOT DEFINE the Bush Doctrine
« Reply #100 on: September 13, 2008, 07:23:20 PM »
Did you know she has a 160 (or 140) or 160 IQ? 

Certainly higher than yours.  :)

Dos Equis

  • Moderator
  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 63885
  • I am. The most interesting man in the world. (Not)
Re: Palin CANNOT DEFINE the Bush Doctrine
« Reply #101 on: September 13, 2008, 08:03:50 PM »
Certainly higher than yours.  :)

Why a law school flunky would say anything about a person's IQ is beyond me?  :)

240 is Back

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 102396
  • Complete website for only $300- www.300website.com
Re: Palin CANNOT DEFINE the Bush Doctrine
« Reply #102 on: September 13, 2008, 08:05:53 PM »
Why a law school flunky would say anything about a person's IQ is beyond me?  :)

A personal training special-ed teacher like BB mocking someone who at least got to law school?  Ironic!

calmus

  • Getbig IV
  • ****
  • Posts: 3867
  • Time is luck.
Re: Palin CANNOT DEFINE the Bush Doctrine
« Reply #103 on: September 13, 2008, 08:06:08 PM »
Why a law school flunky would say anything about a person's IQ is beyond me?  :)

Jesus, you think someone so obsessed with law school would take the LSAT already.

calmus

  • Getbig IV
  • ****
  • Posts: 3867
  • Time is luck.
Re: Palin CANNOT DEFINE the Bush Doctrine
« Reply #104 on: September 13, 2008, 08:08:59 PM »
Even an ed psych guy like you can go to law school, Douche bro.

Dos Equis

  • Moderator
  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 63885
  • I am. The most interesting man in the world. (Not)
Re: Palin CANNOT DEFINE the Bush Doctrine
« Reply #105 on: September 13, 2008, 08:10:16 PM »
Jesus, you think someone so obsessed with law school would take the LSAT already.

So did you get fired when you couldn't pass the bar?

calmus

  • Getbig IV
  • ****
  • Posts: 3867
  • Time is luck.
Re: Palin CANNOT DEFINE the Bush Doctrine
« Reply #106 on: September 13, 2008, 08:11:25 PM »
So did you get fired when you couldn't pass the bar?

I really should have looked for a job, but I couldn't bring myself to do it.  So I didn't get fired.

PS, contact LSAT admin and you can live your dream.

Dos Equis

  • Moderator
  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 63885
  • I am. The most interesting man in the world. (Not)
Re: Palin CANNOT DEFINE the Bush Doctrine
« Reply #107 on: September 13, 2008, 08:13:46 PM »
I really should have looked for a job, but I couldn't bring myself to do it.  So I didn't get fired.

PS, contact LSAT admin and you can live your dream.

Nah.  I'll just continue to mock the arrogant pissant who ironically likes to make fun of other people.   :)

calmus

  • Getbig IV
  • ****
  • Posts: 3867
  • Time is luck.
Re: Palin CANNOT DEFINE the Bush Doctrine
« Reply #108 on: September 13, 2008, 08:14:54 PM »
Nah.  I'll just continue to mock the arrogant pissant who ironically likes to make fun of other people.   :)

What's the irony? I've got some lovely degrees for my parents to frame, and I get to come on her and mock dreamers like you...

Dos Equis

  • Moderator
  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 63885
  • I am. The most interesting man in the world. (Not)
Re: Palin CANNOT DEFINE the Bush Doctrine
« Reply #109 on: September 13, 2008, 08:20:23 PM »
What's the irony? I've got some lovely degrees for my parents to frame, and I get to come on her and mock dreamers like you...

The irony is you're a little dummy, but constantly ridicule people.  But you're starting to bore me . . . .

240 is Back

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 102396
  • Complete website for only $300- www.300website.com
Re: Palin CANNOT DEFINE the Bush Doctrine
« Reply #110 on: September 13, 2008, 08:30:04 PM »
The irony is you're a little dummy, but constantly ridicule people.  But you're starting to bore me . . . .

you can be bored.

but you can't shit on his achievement to get that far. 

Fake Palin on SNL tonight, right now...

calmus

  • Getbig IV
  • ****
  • Posts: 3867
  • Time is luck.
Re: Palin CANNOT DEFINE the Bush Doctrine
« Reply #111 on: September 13, 2008, 08:32:44 PM »

but you can't shit on his achievement to get that far. 


to be fair, I never did go to law school, but I do have some swanky degrees.  :)

Bodvar

  • Getbig II
  • **
  • Posts: 168
Re: Palin CANNOT DEFINE the Bush Doctrine
« Reply #112 on: September 13, 2008, 08:42:43 PM »
Unless I missed it, the only guy that has really “grilled” Obama was Bill O’Reilly. And, if Palin goes on his show, she'll get the barbecue treatment as well.

Honesty I didn't watch that interview. I can't stand O'Reilly. The guy's a pompous ass and the ambush journalism thing he does is fucking disgusting.

But I even think that windbag would me much more fair towards the Republican and Democrat candidates than the mainstream media people. It's that bad! Bill O'Reilly is one of the most objective guys in media now. Think about that.

240 is Back

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 102396
  • Complete website for only $300- www.300website.com
Re: Palin CANNOT DEFINE the Bush Doctrine
« Reply #113 on: September 13, 2008, 08:54:28 PM »
Bill O'Reilly is one of the most objective guys in media now. Think about that.

sad, but i'm starting to agree.  Good to have you and your numbers here.

Bodvar

  • Getbig II
  • **
  • Posts: 168
Re: Palin CANNOT DEFINE the Bush Doctrine
« Reply #114 on: September 13, 2008, 10:03:36 PM »
sad, but i'm starting to agree.  Good to have you and your numbers here.

Haha, I see somebody is paying attention to that little tiff The Luke and I are having on that other thread.

w8tlftr

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 5111
  • I ♥ ( o Y o )
Re: Palin CANNOT DEFINE the Bush Doctrine
« Reply #115 on: September 13, 2008, 10:07:17 PM »
Haha, I see somebody is paying attention to that little tiff The Luke and I are having on that other thread.

That was a pretty solid ass whoopin' you gave out on that thread.

Hard to argue with solid numbers. Especially when they come from multiple sources.

People still try to though.  :-\


calmus

  • Getbig IV
  • ****
  • Posts: 3867
  • Time is luck.
Re: Palin CANNOT DEFINE the Bush Doctrine
« Reply #116 on: September 13, 2008, 10:09:59 PM »
sad, but i'm starting to agree.  Good to have you and your numbers here.

Oh brother. What nos?  Can I get something brief? I'm drinking and trying to figure out if it's worth trying to bang my neighbor before the boss lady gets back... I don't have time to look at his nos, lol, but a summary would be nice.

240 is Back

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 102396
  • Complete website for only $300- www.300website.com
Re: Palin CANNOT DEFINE the Bush Doctrine
« Reply #117 on: September 13, 2008, 10:11:37 PM »
i saw he had a ton of stats on the other thread.  I didn't read them, was watching ohio state lose.  I was happy to see some stats here.

Bodvar

  • Getbig II
  • **
  • Posts: 168
Re: Palin CANNOT DEFINE the Bush Doctrine
« Reply #118 on: September 13, 2008, 10:11:52 PM »
Here's something interesting I ran across: http://marklevinshow.com/gibson-interview/

This is supposedly the transcript of the Gibson Palin interview, including the stuff they edited out.

Keep in mind this is off of Mark Levin's website, who is a hardcore right winger. BUT, if this information he came across is accurate, then ABC is looking pretty damn bad right now. The stuff that is edited out makes Palin come across as much more informed than she did in the actual interview.

Like I said it's from Levin's website so I'm not going to vouch for its authenticity. But they way things are going these days I wouldn't put this past ABC at all.

calmus

  • Getbig IV
  • ****
  • Posts: 3867
  • Time is luck.
Re: Palin CANNOT DEFINE the Bush Doctrine
« Reply #119 on: September 13, 2008, 10:12:37 PM »
Everybody's got stats (like Douche Bum posting flash polls as if they meant something), but good stats are worth their weight in gold.

240 is Back

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 102396
  • Complete website for only $300- www.300website.com
Re: Palin CANNOT DEFINE the Bush Doctrine
« Reply #120 on: September 13, 2008, 10:19:19 PM »
Here's something interesting I ran across: http://marklevinshow.com/gibson-interview/

This is supposedly the transcript of the Gibson Palin interview, including the stuff they edited out.

Keep in mind this is off of Mark Levin's website, who is a hardcore right winger. BUT, if this information he came across is accurate, then ABC is looking pretty damn bad right now. The stuff that is edited out makes Palin come across as much more informed than she did in the actual interview.

Like I said it's from Levin's website so I'm not going to vouch for its authenticity. But they way things are going these days I wouldn't put this past ABC at all.

ANY candidate doing such an interview would have their own recording going the whole time, to keep ABC honest.

If it was skewed/changed, then team mccain should put their transcript and recording online for the world to see and PROVE the media bias.  Instead we have one neocon wingnut trying to defend it - when they already defend EVERYTHING mccain does and attack everything obama does.

24KT

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 24455
  • Gold Savings Account Rep +1 (310) 409-2244
Re: Palin CANNOT DEFINE the Bush Doctrine
« Reply #121 on: September 14, 2008, 01:54:29 AM »
What's your IQ grandma?   :)

It's high enough to get me into MENSA  8)
w

24KT

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 24455
  • Gold Savings Account Rep +1 (310) 409-2244
Re: Palin CANNOT DEFINE the Bush Doctrine
« Reply #122 on: September 14, 2008, 01:57:18 AM »
Good post.  Good points.  The media has been infatuated with Obama. 

What do you expect? Look at the alternative.
w

Neurotoxin

  • Getbig IV
  • ****
  • Posts: 2101
Re: Palin CANNOT DEFINE the Bush Doctrine
« Reply #123 on: September 14, 2008, 04:20:25 AM »
It's high enough to get me into MENSA  8)


Beach Bum = powned !  ;D



NT

Dos Equis

  • Moderator
  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 63885
  • I am. The most interesting man in the world. (Not)
Re: Palin CANNOT DEFINE the Bush Doctrine
« Reply #124 on: September 14, 2008, 11:11:34 AM »
It's high enough to get me into MENSA  8)

Hahahahahahah!  And I'm Sean Connery.   :)  You can't even get your lies about your IQ straight, Einstein.  I don't think anyone will ever confuse you with a genius and you definitely are not on par with Einstein.  lol . . .  Since you forgot you had a 160 IQ, here is a refresher.   :) 

Quote
No... I said my IQ is 160, ...although after reading many of the posters like Nordic,
...I wouldn't be suprised if it has dropped a few points.  HA!  ;D

Quote
Are you seriously saying you have the IQ of Albert Einstein? 

"Einstein was considered to 'only' have an IQ of about 160."

http://wilderdom.com/intelligence/IQWhatScoresMean.html

Quote
:o wtf?!

{blush}   :-[   oh poop! ...I made a mistake.   :-[  It's actually 140, not 160.

My mistake. It's only 140. I knew it was a number that just barely squeeked me into the category of "genius", but I'm not claiming to be on the same level as Einstein. It's no big deal, it's just a number that represents potential.

Thanks for posting that link BB.

Quote
{blush}  :-[ Oh man, ...I can just see this now. You'all are never gonna let me live this down are you? {lol}

1st of all, IQ really means nothing to me. If it did, I probably would have remembered it.
2nd I had no idea Einstein's IQ was 160. When I read that, I realized there was no way I was on par with Einstein.
3rd I know my IQ is the bare minimum that places me in the 'genius' category by the skin of my teeth. When I saw the link BB posted, I realized the number was infact 140 and not 160. It was an error on my part. Even a genius like me can make the occasional error.  ;)

Quote
I pulled it because I thought that was what it was.

Dah YA!

When I saw that that was the same as Einstein's I thought to myself "That can't be right". When I clicked the link that BB posted, I realized the 'genius' category is 140, not 160. that was when I realized I had made an error.

Twas a simple error ...no more. But I can see you're going to try to milk it as long as you can.
If your life is that boring that you can derive some type of pleasure from this, ...who am I to deprive you?
What a mundane existence you must enjoy  ;)

Quote
I might just take your advice on this, ...but first, I'll self pwn myself even further.

Seems the number 160 was in my mind for a reason. It was indeed my IQ score, not 140 afterall. {blush}  :-[
it could be that different tests have different scoring systems? I don't know.