Author Topic: Conspiracies In Bodybuilding  (Read 15603 times)

pumpster

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 18890
  • If you're reading this you have too much free time
Re: Conspiracies In Bodybuilding
« Reply #25 on: November 17, 2008, 03:47:34 AM »
Dickerson was symmetrical and aesthetically pleasing, but he wasn't exactly tall himself. Calling Padilla stumpy...? Belknap and Franco were stumpy, Danny had flow and pleasing lines to his physique, much like Dickerson. Both were great, IMO.

Calling Padilla stumpy and not Dicerson, when it was Padilla with superior lines, indicates that he's talking out his ass.


Hope this helps.

johnny1

  • Getbig IV
  • ****
  • Posts: 2486
Re: Conspiracies In Bodybuilding
« Reply #26 on: November 17, 2008, 01:25:11 PM »
 :) Padilla had superior LINES than Dickerson :).....O.K......pumpster!

johnny1

  • Getbig IV
  • ****
  • Posts: 2486
Re: Conspiracies In Bodybuilding
« Reply #27 on: November 17, 2008, 01:57:46 PM »
..... :)

johnny1

  • Getbig IV
  • ****
  • Posts: 2486
Re: Conspiracies In Bodybuilding
« Reply #28 on: November 17, 2008, 02:10:45 PM »
1981.... :)